(10-28-2010 03:11 PM)Raider_ATO Wrote: (10-28-2010 12:01 PM)paco Wrote: I hope the WAC adds Montana, UTSA, Denver and Seattle.
The additions help with market size, and FB, BB probably will
be okay.
How is adding 1 FCS program helping the conference's football? (UTSA's FB team exists just a little bit more than Denver and Seattle's does.)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Apparently there are no FBS programs avaliable to the WAC.
Montana may be FCS, but IMO Montana has name recognition,
probably will draw more than twenty thousand to its FB games,
and has been successful at the FCS level. All a benefit to the WAC.
UTSA, from everything I read--- is going to put a FB team on the
field, playing at FBS level. UTSA has potential, large market, and
a ready to go FB stadium.
Seattle and denver both reside in large market area's, something
needed and that will be a benefit to the WAC.