+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: AACbbs (/forum-460.html)
+---- Forum: AAC Conference Talk (/forum-409.html)
+---- Thread: NCAA NET Rankings and Resumes -Updated 2/17 (/thread-890566.html)
NCAA NET Rankings and Resumes -Updated 2/17 - Stickboy46 - 12-16-2019 11:04 AM
NET Rankings as of 02/17/2020
https://www.ncaa.com/rankings/basket...l-net-rankings
02/17 | 02/13
27 | 27 Houston
46 | 50 Wichita State
51 | 47 Cincy
60 | 59 Memphis
67 | 73 SMU
71 | 75 UCONN
82 | 87 Tulsa
106 | 106 Temple
121 | 116 USF
125 | 120 UCF
187 | 186 Tulane
208 | 208 E Carolina
Resumes -02/17
https://bracketologists.com/teams/
Wichita State
Q1: 2-3
Q2: 6-3
Q3: 3-0
Q4: 8-0
Memphis
Q1: 1-4
Q2: 5-2
Q3: 5-2
Q4: 6-0
Temple
Q1: 1-6
Q2: 4-2
Q3: 3-3
Q4: 5-1
Houston
Q1: 2-4
Q2: 7-2
Q3: 6-0
Q4: 5-0
UCONN
Q1: 0-6
Q2: 4-3
Q3: 3-1
Q4: 7-1
SMU
Q1: 2-2
Q2: 2-3
Q3: 5-1
Q4: 9-0
UCF
Q1: 0-4
Q2: 0-4
Q3: 8-3
Q4: 5-0
Cincy
Q1: 2-5
Q2: 6-0
Q3: 6-3
Q4: 3-0
Tulsa
Q1: 2-2
Q2: 3-5
Q3: 7-0
Q4: 5-1
Tulane
Q1: 0-5
Q2: 3-3
Q3: 0-6
Q4: 7-1
USF
Q1: 1-5
Q2: 3-3
Q3: 2-5
Q4: 5-1
ECU
Q1: 0-4
Q2: 1-4
Q3: 2-3
Q4: 7-5
RE: NCAA NET Rankings and Resumes - JRR_IV - 12-16-2019 11:10 AM
Questionable to have Wichita State above Memphis at this point. Only 3 teams in the Top 50...
RE: NCAA NET Rankings and Resumes - Tiger1983 - 12-16-2019 11:15 AM
(12-16-2019 11:04 AM)Stickboy46 Wrote: NET Rankings as of 12/16/2019
https://www.ncaa.com/rankings/basketball-men/d1/ncaa-mens-basketball-net-rankings (not updated yet)
see here https://extra.ncaa.org/solutions/rpi/Stats%20Library/NET%20Nitty%20Gritty%20-%20Dec.%2015,%202019.pdf
14 Wichita State
16 Memphis
49 Temple
68 Houston
69 UCONN
88 SMU
109 UCF
110 Cincy
121 Tulsa
127 Tulane
176 USF
243 E Carolina
Resumes
TBD
Thanks for the notice.
RE: NCAA NET Rankings and Resumes - pesik - 12-16-2019 11:18 AM
(12-16-2019 11:10 AM)JRR_IV Wrote: Questionable to have Wichita State above Memphis at this point. Only 3 teams in the Top 50...
net takes into account how the games were played (point differential, efficiency, stats)
memphis is winning close game, in statically not efficent games...Wichita is blowing out teams
RE: NCAA NET Rankings and Resumes - Stickboy46 - 12-16-2019 11:19 AM
(12-16-2019 11:10 AM)JRR_IV Wrote: Questionable to have Wichita State above Memphis at this point. Only 3 teams in the Top 50...
Memphis has the better paper resume. The margin of victories must be driving some of it
RE: NCAA NET Rankings and Resumes - natibeast21 - 12-16-2019 11:22 AM
Ugh we need to win Wednesday against Tennessee bad.
RE: NCAA NET Rankings and Resumes - Wheatshock - 12-16-2019 11:26 AM
I know a lot have been a little disappointed in the overall performance of league so far.
Even with a shaky start by a few I feel pretty good about having 6 teams in the top 100 and 10 top 150 at this point.
RE: NCAA NET Rankings and Resumes - sfink16 - 12-16-2019 11:26 AM
Lots will change the rest of the season but it's obvious 2 teams are definite advances and 1 possible/probable with the rest more work to be done.
RE: NCAA NET Rankings and Resumes - ECUGrad07 - 12-16-2019 11:28 AM
We had a terrible start.
Having to rely on 2 true freshmen at Point Guard that most definitely would have either red-shirted or seen VERY few minutes hurt us, I think.
I think by the end of the year, now that we're starting to get healthier, we'll see a much better team. Having Robinson & Jackson back at PG for us is big. The silver lining thus far is that we found out that Newton (true freshman PG) is going to be an absolute stud for us down the road.
Really, really high on Suggs & Newton.
RE: NCAA NET Rankings and Resumes - Tiger1983 - 12-16-2019 11:29 AM
RE: NCAA NET Rankings and Resumes - Tiger1983 - 12-16-2019 11:31 AM
RE: NCAA NET Rankings and Resumes - pesik - 12-16-2019 11:33 AM
houston with these ranking that have utep at 70, we have a chance at 2 q2, and 1 q1 game over the next 9 days.....
i dont think we beat Washington, they are the epitome of all of houston weaknesses...but if we do...we'll be in great shape
RE: NCAA NET Rankings and Resumes - Tiger1983 - 12-16-2019 11:42 AM
A caveat: NET is significantly volatile at this point in the season.
RE: NCAA NET Rankings and Resumes - Stickboy46 - 12-16-2019 11:44 AM
(12-16-2019 11:42 AM)Tiger1983 Wrote: A caveat: NET is significantly volatile at this point in the season.
Very true .. but for some this starting point is great (Wichita/Memphis) ... for others ... it's a hill to climb (Cincy, UCF, Tulsa)
RE: NCAA NET Rankings and Resumes - Stickboy46 - 12-16-2019 11:45 AM
(12-16-2019 11:31 AM)Tiger1983 Wrote:
That Florida win went from an expected Q1 win ... all the way to Q3 at this point ...
RE: NCAA NET Rankings and Resumes - Tiger1983 - 12-16-2019 11:45 AM
RE: NCAA NET Rankings and Resumes - Stickboy46 - 12-16-2019 11:45 AM
Also note: The resumes might be slightly off ... looks like the team sheets are bracketing the teams into Quadrants correctly and I didn't overly scan but noticed a few mistakes when updating the non-con thread
RE: NCAA NET Rankings and Resumes - Def Berkkat - 12-16-2019 11:47 AM
I think it's a bit early for this talk.
A lot of teams that are not good now will have their heads removed from their hind parts by February.
… and hopefully we're one of them.
RE: NCAA NET Rankings and Resumes - Stickboy46 - 12-16-2019 11:49 AM
(12-16-2019 11:47 AM)Def Berkkat Wrote: I think it's a bit early for this talk.
A lot of teams that are not good now will have their heads removed from their hind parts by February.
… and hopefully we're one of them.
It's a data point 1/3 of the way through the year.
RE: NCAA NET Rankings and Resumes - JRR_IV - 12-16-2019 11:57 AM
(12-16-2019 11:18 AM)pesik Wrote:(12-16-2019 11:10 AM)JRR_IV Wrote: Questionable to have Wichita State above Memphis at this point. Only 3 teams in the Top 50...
net takes into account how the games were played (point differential, efficiency, stats)
memphis is winning close game, in statically not efficent games...Wichita is blowing out teams
That’s fair. Just thought it was weird considering who Memphis has beat compared to Wichita State.