CSNbbs
Resumes (Potentially the Bubble) - Printable Version

+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: CAAbbs (/forum-676.html)
+---- Forum: CAA Conference Talk (/forum-677.html)
+----- Forum: Drexel (/forum-681.html)
+----- Thread: Resumes (Potentially the Bubble) (/thread-870895.html)



Resumes (Potentially the Bubble) - dan10 - 02-20-2019 01:08 PM

As the season winds down there is more and more talk abut who is in and who is out. Since the conferences realigned the mid low major conferences have really struggled. That gap is not going to narrow any time soon, especially with some majors going to 20 game conference schedules.

With the new invention of the metric NET these are the teams that appear to be on the borderline. I will use quadrant wins from the NET rankings. I will use only Q1 and Q2 records as those are likely the only ones that matter. Unfortunately we are going to see a bunch of middling majors get the call...again

The bubble is approximately 25 spots with 34 teams from all conferences fighting for a bid. Realistically it comes down to about 5 or 6 teams for a couple of bids. This season is the season for middling power conference teams. I suspect we are going to see close to a handful of teams dancing with losing records in conference.

In order by NET ranking:

Wofford: 23-4 (15-0)- 26 NET Ranking. Remaining: 1 Q1 game
Q1: 2-4
Q2: 4-0
Sub Q2 losses: 0

NC State: 18-8 (6-7)- 32 NET Ranking. Remaining: 2 Q1 games
Q1: 1-7
Q2: 6-0
Sub Q2 losses: 1

Florida: 14-11 (6-6)- 33 NET Ranking. Remaining: 3 Q1, 1 Q2 games
Q1: 2-8
Q2: 3-2
Sub Q2 losses: 1

Utah State: 20-6 (10-3)- 34 NET ranking. Remaining: 1 Q1 games
Q1: 0-3
Q2: 2-1
Sub Q2 losses: 2

Texas: 15-11 (7-6)- 35 NET Ranking. Remaining: 4 Q1, 1 Q2 games
Q1: 5-5
Q2: 4-3
Sub Q2 losses: 3

Lipscomb: 21-5 (12-1)- 37 NET Ranking. Remaining: 0 games of Q1 or Q2
Q1: 2-3
Q2: 1-2
Sub Q2 losses: 0

Oklahoma: 16-10 (4-9)- 39 NET Ranking. Remaining: 3 Q1, 1 Q2 games
Q1: 2-8
Q2: 5-2
Sub Q2 losses: 0

UCF: 19-5 (9-3)- 40 NET Ranking. Remaining: 4 Q1, 1 Q2 games
Q1: 0-2
Q2: 5-2
Sub Q2 losses: 1

Clemson: 15-11 (5-8)- 41 NET Ranking. Remaining: 1 Q1 , 3 Q2 games
Q1: 1-8
Q2: 3-3
Sub Q2 losses: 0

VCU: 20-6 (11-2)- 42 NET Ranking. Remaining: 0 games of Q1 or Q2
Q1: 1-2
Q2: 3-2
Sub Q2 losses: 2

TCU: 17-9 (5-8)- 43 NET Ranking. Remaining: 4 Q1, 1 Q2
Q1: 1-6
Q2: 5-2
Sub Q2 losses: 1

Ohio State: 16-9 (6-8)- 45 NET Ranking. Remaining: 4 Q1, 1 Q2 games
Q1: 4-6
Q2: 2-2
Sub Q2 losses: 1

Syracuse: 17-8 (8-4)- 48 NET Ranking. Remaining: 5 Q1 games
Q1: 1-4
Q2: 4-0
Sub Q2 losses: 4

Butler: 15-11 (6-7)- 49 NET Ranking. Remaining: 2 Q1, 1 Q2 games
Q1: 1-6
Q2: 6-3
Sub Q2 losses: 2

Alabama: 15-11 (6-7)- 50 NET Ranking. Remaining: 3 Q1, 1 Q2 games
Q1: 3-6
Q2: 5-3
Sub Q2 losses: 2

Minnesota: 17-9 (7-8)- 51 NET Ranking. Remaining: 3 Q1, 2 Q2
Q1: 2-7
Q2: 4-2
Sub Q2 losses: 0

Temple: 19-7 (9-4)- 53 NET Ranking. Remaining: 1 Q1, 3 Q2 games
Q1: 1-5
Q2: 4-1
Sub Q2 losses: 1

Hofstra: 22-5 (12-2)- 58 NET ranking. Remaining: 0 games of Q1 or Q2
Q1: 0-2
Q2: 1-1
Sub Q2 losses: 2

Belmont: 21-4 (12-2)- 59 NET ranking. Remaining: 0 games of Q1 or Q2
Q1: 2-1
Q2: 3-1
Sub Q2 losses: 2

Seton Hall: 16-9 (7-6)- 60 NET Ranking. Remaining: 3 Q1, 1 Q2 games
Q1: 3-5
Q2: 4-2
Sub Q2 losses: 2

Davidson: 19-7 (10-3)- 67 NET ranking. Remaining: 0 games of Q1 or Q2
Q1: 0-2
Q2: 3-1
Sub Q2 losses: 4

Arizona State: 17-8 (8-5)- 68 NET Ranking. Remaining: 1 Q1, 2 Q2 games
Q1: 2-2
Q2: 7-3
Sub Q2 losses: 3


RE: Resumes (Potentially the Bubble) - Dragon For Life - 02-22-2019 02:25 AM

I don't see Drexel's name...