(03-08-2018 06:02 PM)RoosHouse Wrote:  (1/351) * (1/351) = 0.00008. An adjusted ratio for fouls per game and set wouldn't be that much higher when you have an outlier like these last two games. UMKC is 182nd in fouls per game so midtier.

UMKC has led in nation in tournament play in opponent free throw attempts the last two games. (2017 + 2018)They happen to be against NMSU and GCU which leads WAC in attendance, but I think this one was more the WAC knows umkc is leaving.

There was too many phantom calls in this one. They were all big in 3 point game, but none probably bigger than Giles charge call and then phantom call where benson shoots two free throws.

(03-08-2018 06:17 PM)RoosHouse Wrote:  Its not a conspiracy. The statistical odds for UMKC to give up that many fee throws in back to back tournament games to NMSU (33fts) and GCU (35fts) is 0.008% chance.

(03-08-2018 05:18 PM)RoosHouse Wrote:  Been nice wac, but refs just confirmed everything. UMKC just played its last game in WAC.

Giles charge call was difference.

(03-08-2018 05:56 PM)ProfScott Wrote:  

(03-08-2018 05:46 PM)RoosHouse Wrote:  

(03-08-2018 05:34 PM)ProfScott Wrote:  

(03-08-2018 04:23 PM)RoosHouse Wrote:  Way to rig it wac. What a joke

Letting a little home team bias seep in here? Roos played an outstanding game and GCU stunk up the place. We are very, very fortunate to pull out the win.

2nd year in a row the team we lose to will shoot the most fee throws in the country in tournament play. That has a 0.00811681 % chance of happening.

Don't have UMKC waste its athletic budget to fly out there.

I think your statistical odds are a bit off. Richardson had the Roos playing in your face defense the whole time (great strategy by the way) which tends to lead to more fouls being called.

(03-08-2018 08:51 PM)Lopes87 Wrote:  The Roos led 72-69 until they missed 3/4 shots and committed consecutive turnovers at the end of the game but we can focus on the FT's.

(03-08-2018 10:05 PM)Raider_Lope Wrote:  So, I got to listen to the last four minutes of the game. I was freaking out at work during a string of meetings when I saw we were down 20-4. This was the team that beat UVU, not the one who lost to CSU. Then I listened to GCU squeeze out the win. So, I didn’t get to see any of the game.

I say this because I want to know honestly if the game was really called that poorly? I can’t weigh in on the discussion due to not having been able to see it.

(03-08-2018 10:28 PM)RoosHouse Wrote:  

(03-08-2018 10:05 PM)Raider_Lope Wrote:  So, I got to listen to the last four minutes of the game. I was freaking out at work during a string of meetings when I saw we were down 20-4. This was the team that beat UVU, not the one who lost to CSU. Then I listened to GCU squeeze out the win. So, I didn’t get to see any of the game.

I say this because I want to know honestly if the game was really called that poorly? I can’tigh in on the discussion due to not having been able to see it.

The biggest sequence was with 2:20 left roos up 72-71. Giles who scored 13 points in 15 minutes because that is all the refs let him play got called for charge on a made basket which no ref would ever say is a charge so he fouls out instead of up 74-71. Then Benson I've looked a replay nobody touches him flops to get free throws. That is how Grand Canyon got the lead free throws.

The two lever fouls when he missed his 3's are also complete and utter biased calls/bs whatever and that's 5 points there.

(03-08-2018 10:43 PM)RoosHouse Wrote:  In Summary, it doesn't matter because UMKC wasn't beating NMSU and Lever might be the most overrated player since Braun

(03-08-2018 10:05 PM)Raider_Lope Wrote:  So, I got to listen to the last four minutes of the game. I was freaking out at work during a string of meetings when I saw we were down 20-4. This was the team that beat UVU, not the one who lost to CSU. Then I listened to GCU squeeze out the win. So, I didn’t get to see any of the game.

I say this because I want to know honestly if the game was really called that poorly? I can’t weigh in on the discussion due to not having been able to see it.