CSNbbs
ULM 0 vs #5 LSU 51, Game Thread (FINAL) - Printable Version

+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: SunBeltbbs (/forum-317.html)
+---- Forum: Sun Belt Conference Talk (/forum-296.html)
+---- Thread: ULM 0 vs #5 LSU 51, Game Thread (FINAL) (/thread-462955.html)



ULM 0 vs #5 LSU 51, Game Thread (FINAL) - TU94 - 11-13-2010 01:42 PM

Tiger Stadium
Baton Rouge, Lousiana
6:00pm

LSU -33.0
O/U: 46.5

ESPN3


RE: ULM vs #5 LSU Game Thread - TU94 - 11-13-2010 07:57 PM

20-0 LSU with 12:28 left in the 2nd.


RE: ULM vs #5 LSU Game Thread - BlueRaiderFan. - 11-13-2010 08:08 PM

Come on Warhawks!


RE: ULM vs #5 LSU Game Thread - dahbeed - 11-13-2010 08:20 PM

(11-13-2010 08:08 PM)BlueRaiderFan. Wrote:  Come on Warhawks!

come on lsu. i prayed that ulm would lose every game the rest of the season. i don't want to have any diety look bad.


RE: ULM vs #5 LSU Game Thread - BlueRaiderFan. - 11-13-2010 09:23 PM

Diety?


RE: ULM vs #5 LSU Game Thread - SOT1977 - 11-13-2010 09:36 PM

Yeah, what is he talking about?

ULM's defense is playing pretty good. The Tigers have only 173 yards of offense thru three quarters.


RE: ULM vs #5 LSU Game Thread - cajun4life - 11-13-2010 09:50 PM

(11-13-2010 09:36 PM)SOT1977 Wrote:  Yeah, what is he talking about?

ULM's defense is playing pretty good. The Tigers have only 173 yards of offense thru three quarters.

And it is still 44-0, playing great.


RE: ULM vs #5 LSU Game Thread - SOT1977 - 11-13-2010 10:01 PM

(11-13-2010 09:50 PM)cajun4life Wrote:  
(11-13-2010 09:36 PM)SOT1977 Wrote:  Yeah, what is he talking about?

ULM's defense is playing pretty good. The Tigers have only 173 yards of offense thru three quarters.

And it is still 44-0, playing great.

Offense turned the ball over 5 times which LSU scored off of each time plus we had lousy field position all game long. Hard to defense when LSU scores on an interception, a fumble, and a 12-yard drive. The defense IS playing great. Alabama's D gave up 448 yards to the Tigers. ULM, at this moment, has held them to around 280.


RE: ULM vs #5 LSU Game Thread - RaiderATO - 11-13-2010 10:06 PM

When a team only has to go 30 yds to score every possession, you won't see many yards gained.


RE: ULM vs #5 LSU Game Thread - dahbeed - 11-13-2010 10:09 PM

(11-13-2010 09:23 PM)BlueRaiderFan. Wrote:  Diety?

the diety i prayed to for them to not win a game the rest of the year.

if they win a game it might make the diety look bad in some folks eyes....

as in not answering my prayer.

entiende amigo???


RE: ULM 0 vs #5 LSU 51, Game Thread (FINAL) - ULMSOT - 11-13-2010 10:33 PM

embarrassing!


RE: ULM 0 vs #5 LSU 51, Game Thread (FINAL) - RaiderATO - 11-14-2010 10:21 AM

(11-13-2010 10:09 PM)dahbeed Wrote:  
(11-13-2010 09:23 PM)BlueRaiderFan. Wrote:  Diety?

the diety i prayed to for them to not win a game the rest of the year.

if they win a game it might make the diety look bad in some folks eyes....

as in not answering my prayer.

entiende amigo???

Which one did you pray to? The god of Nutrisystem, Lord Jenny Craig, Shiva of Weight Watchers, or did you walk the Hydroxy-cut path?


RE: ULM 0 vs #5 LSU 51, Game Thread (FINAL) - dahbeed - 11-14-2010 10:43 AM

(11-14-2010 10:21 AM)Raider_ATO Wrote:  
(11-13-2010 10:09 PM)dahbeed Wrote:  
(11-13-2010 09:23 PM)BlueRaiderFan. Wrote:  Diety?

the diety i prayed to for them to not win a game the rest of the year.

if they win a game it might make the diety look bad in some folks eyes....

as in not answering my prayer.

entiende amigo???

Which one did you pray to? The god of Nutrisystem, Lord Jenny Craig, Shiva of Weight Watchers, or did you walk the Hydroxy-cut path?

i prayed to patton oswalt....he's number 54 in the photo below:

p.s. he's 2-2 so far since i prayed.

[Image: bigfan_filmstill3_t614.jpg?a3ca5463f16dc...6025dcea0e]


RE: ULM vs #5 LSU Game Thread - cajun4life - 11-14-2010 10:47 AM

(11-13-2010 10:01 PM)SOT1977 Wrote:  
(11-13-2010 09:50 PM)cajun4life Wrote:  
(11-13-2010 09:36 PM)SOT1977 Wrote:  Yeah, what is he talking about?

ULM's defense is playing pretty good. The Tigers have only 173 yards of offense thru three quarters.

And it is still 44-0, playing great.

Offense turned the ball over 5 times which LSU scored off of each time plus we had lousy field position all game long. Hard to defense when LSU scores on an interception, a fumble, and a 12-yard drive. The defense IS playing great. Alabama's D gave up 448 yards to the Tigers. ULM, at this moment, has held them to around 280.

You are using the same argument Cajun fans used when we got dismantled by UGA. They played on a short field all day. Stll got our ass kicked.

LSU just did the same thing to ULM, no way to spin it. Had LSU needed to drive the length of the field they would have. Bottom line is. it was an ugly loss.


RE: ULM 0 vs #5 LSU 51, Game Thread (FINAL) - zeebart21 - 11-14-2010 12:40 PM

(11-14-2010 10:43 AM)dahbeed Wrote:  
(11-14-2010 10:21 AM)Raider_ATO Wrote:  
(11-13-2010 10:09 PM)dahbeed Wrote:  
(11-13-2010 09:23 PM)BlueRaiderFan. Wrote:  Diety?

the diety i prayed to for them to not win a game the rest of the year.

if they win a game it might make the diety look bad in some folks eyes....

as in not answering my prayer.

entiende amigo???

Which one did you pray to? The god of Nutrisystem, Lord Jenny Craig, Shiva of Weight Watchers, or did you walk the Hydroxy-cut path?

i prayed to patton oswalt....he's number 54 in the photo below:

p.s. he's 2-2 so far since i prayed.

[Image: bigfan_filmstill3_t614.jpg?a3ca5463f16dc...6025dcea0e]

whats up beed? Patton Oswalt?? LOL! Did you see that movie? It was awesome! Beware the paintball gun Eagles fan!!! Hope all is well, my friend!!

Z


RE: ULM 0 vs #5 LSU 51, Game Thread (FINAL) - dahbeed - 11-14-2010 03:04 PM

(11-14-2010 12:40 PM)zeebart21 Wrote:  
(11-14-2010 10:43 AM)dahbeed Wrote:  
(11-14-2010 10:21 AM)Raider_ATO Wrote:  
(11-13-2010 10:09 PM)dahbeed Wrote:  
(11-13-2010 09:23 PM)BlueRaiderFan. Wrote:  Diety?

the diety i prayed to for them to not win a game the rest of the year.

if they win a game it might make the diety look bad in some folks eyes....

as in not answering my prayer.

entiende amigo???

Which one did you pray to? The god of Nutrisystem, Lord Jenny Craig, Shiva of Weight Watchers, or did you walk the Hydroxy-cut path?

i prayed to patton oswalt....he's number 54 in the photo below:

p.s. he's 2-2 so far since i prayed.

[Image: bigfan_filmstill3_t614.jpg?a3ca5463f16dc...6025dcea0e]

whats up beed? Patton Oswalt?? LOL! Did you see that movie? It was awesome! Beware the paintball gun Eagles fan!!! Hope all is well, my friend!!

Z

sure i saw it.....i haven't called into the hilltoppah hotline radio show since.

hell....i didn't post on a message board for a week after watching it.

all is well up here amigo.....football and hoops won on the same weekend since i can't remember.

p.s. i meant to say patton is 2 for 2....my 2-2 could be construed wrongly.


RE: ULM vs #5 LSU Game Thread - Arrowhead - 11-15-2010 09:21 AM

Agreed Cajun, no way to spin it. We got our asses kicked.



(11-14-2010 10:47 AM)cajun4life Wrote:  
(11-13-2010 10:01 PM)SOT1977 Wrote:  
(11-13-2010 09:50 PM)cajun4life Wrote:  
(11-13-2010 09:36 PM)SOT1977 Wrote:  Yeah, what is he talking about?

ULM's defense is playing pretty good. The Tigers have only 173 yards of offense thru three quarters.

And it is still 44-0, playing great.

Offense turned the ball over 5 times which LSU scored off of each time plus we had lousy field position all game long. Hard to defense when LSU scores on an interception, a fumble, and a 12-yard drive. The defense IS playing great. Alabama's D gave up 448 yards to the Tigers. ULM, at this moment, has held them to around 280.

You are using the same argument Cajun fans used when we got dismantled by UGA. They played on a short field all day. Stll got our ass kicked.

LSU just did the same thing to ULM, no way to spin it. Had LSU needed to drive the length of the field they would have. Bottom line is. it was an ugly loss.



RE: ULM 0 vs #5 LSU 51, Game Thread (FINAL) - bmwilder139 - 11-15-2010 09:49 AM

that was an old fashioned spanking. It sucked.