(01-22-2024 06:59 AM)OujoKnight Wrote:  

(01-21-2024 11:05 AM)CaliforniaCowboy Wrote:  

(01-21-2024 10:42 AM)OujoKnight Wrote:  

(01-21-2024 10:16 AM)CaliforniaCowboy Wrote:  

(01-21-2024 09:57 AM)WhoseHouse? Wrote:  But the fact that you think it’s fine for fans to taunt and verbally abuse players but not play for players to hold a hand sign upside down tells me all I need to know about you.

but... it's not about me.... the LEAGUE made it illegal... not me.

stop trying to make things about me, and what I think. I only repeated what is, not what I think.

YOU are the one who is only posting your opinions and YOUR views, which as I pointed out are contrary to league policy.

Like I said, moving on, you only want to argue about your opinions, which I have little interest in.

The players did it, they should have been sanctioned, but alas, it was after the contest so game penalties could not be applied.

Move on already. It's fact, it's documented. It is not my opinion.

I'm not going to argue with you about what you think of your opinion.

“They should have been sanctioned” is your opinion, which incidentally is not grounded in the rule. The rule provides that the horns down signal used during the game is prohibited, so if it was not used during the game, why do you believe “they should have been sanctioned?”

DUDE... you get a ZERO for reading comprehension, and an "F" for failure at dog piling.

READ the REST OF THE SENTENCE (starting with ALAS)

my gawd, some of you just like to hear yourselves argue with your own interpretations of what others have actually said.

You cannot cherry pick parts of a sentence, or cherry pick sentences from the context of the paragraph or post. You must read the whole statement for clarity and context.

Why? By pointing out how illogical your position is? I saw the alas, and merely pointed out the inconsistency of your statement. Can you not see it for yourself? Let me tell it to you like you’re a second grader so you might understand. They did not break the policy because it is only actionable during a game, the game was over, therefore they did not violate the policy, and if they didn’t violate the policy, they did nothing wrong. So why should they be sanctioned? When you say “they should have been sanctioned” before acknowledging that they didn’t violate the policy indicates to objective observers that your position/opinion is without merit. Btw, I didn’t choose your words, you did.

go away troll

(01-22-2024 09:42 AM)CaliforniaCowboy Wrote:  

(01-22-2024 06:59 AM)OujoKnight Wrote:  

(01-21-2024 11:05 AM)CaliforniaCowboy Wrote:  

(01-21-2024 10:42 AM)OujoKnight Wrote:  

(01-21-2024 10:16 AM)CaliforniaCowboy Wrote:  but... it's not about me.... the LEAGUE made it illegal... not me.

stop trying to make things about me, and what I think. I only repeated what is, not what I think.

YOU are the one who is only posting your opinions and YOUR views, which as I pointed out are contrary to league policy.

Like I said, moving on, you only want to argue about your opinions, which I have little interest in.

The players did it, they should have been sanctioned, but alas, it was after the contest so game penalties could not be applied.

Move on already. It's fact, it's documented. It is not my opinion.

I'm not going to argue with you about what you think of your opinion.

“They should have been sanctioned” is your opinion, which incidentally is not grounded in the rule. The rule provides that the horns down signal used during the game is prohibited, so if it was not used during the game, why do you believe “they should have been sanctioned?”

DUDE... you get a ZERO for reading comprehension, and an "F" for failure at dog piling.

READ the REST OF THE SENTENCE (starting with ALAS)

my gawd, some of you just like to hear yourselves argue with your own interpretations of what others have actually said.

You cannot cherry pick parts of a sentence, or cherry pick sentences from the context of the paragraph or post. You must read the whole statement for clarity and context.

Why? By pointing out how illogical your position is? I saw the alas, and merely pointed out the inconsistency of your statement. Can you not see it for yourself? Let me tell it to you like you’re a second grader so you might understand. They did not break the policy because it is only actionable during a game, the game was over, therefore they did not violate the policy, and if they didn’t violate the policy, they did nothing wrong. So why should they be sanctioned? When you say “they should have been sanctioned” before acknowledging that they didn’t violate the policy indicates to objective observers that your position/opinion is without merit. Btw, I didn’t choose your words, you did.

go away troll

Dude, you’re the one who everyone else disagrees with, and with a well deserved negative reputation. You can’t explain your position so you whip out the troll card. You have clearly lost the debate. Grow up.

So this was the front row of the BYU student section vs Texas today. They were asked to remove the shirts partway through the first half by BYU stadium personnel. It doesn't appear that anyone with Texas requested to have them removed. BYU won 84-72.