(08-03-2023 02:15 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-03-2023 02:14 PM)Eagleyed Wrote:  

(08-03-2023 01:56 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(08-03-2023 07:08 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-02-2023 05:43 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  So what that she worked for Boies Schiller? And so what that Hunter previously worked there?

Is the new rule that any attorney that worked for any law firm that employed any person with any political tie is suspect? Seroiusly?

Or are you just limiting the rank speculation to Hunter?

Or should we extend this tenuous connection paradigm to Ailleen Cannon and her work at Gibson Dunn?

Sorry, that is a real thin stretch, #s.

That old man lost any credibility he had years ago when he became nothing more than a sycophant to the trolls here. Sad.

So an honest question; who chose this judge?

That's a good question.

Random. Just like Cannon getting the last case filed in Florida.

Any chance you have a link for it. I searched for it and I couldn't find anything other than a couple of links talking about judges being appointed for cases which is certainly not random. But, it wasn't for the same type of case as here. And if it is random is it someone looking at a list and pulling a name? Random number generator? I am curious how this is done.

(08-03-2023 02:20 PM)Eagleyed Wrote:  

(08-03-2023 02:15 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-03-2023 02:14 PM)Eagleyed Wrote:  

(08-03-2023 01:56 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(08-03-2023 07:08 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  That old man lost any credibility he had years ago when he became nothing more than a sycophant to the trolls here. Sad.

So an honest question; who chose this judge?

That's a good question.

Random. Just like Cannon getting the last case filed in Florida.

Any chance you have a link for it. I searched for it and I couldn't find anything other than a couple of links talking about judges being appointed for cases which is certainly not random. But, it wasn't for the same type of case as here. And if it is random is it someone looking at a list and pulling a name? Random number generator? I am curious how this is done.

From Post #37 above...this is from a story at CBS

Quote:...a computerized random selection process that assigns new cases to any of the 22 federal district judges who preside in Washington.

Some more information:

Quote:How was trump’s trial judge chosen?

By random draw. But not every judge had an equal chance of getting the case. By court rule, cases are assigned through a random process intended to prevent prosecutors from judge-shopping in pursuit of a friendlier forum, or judges from steering cases among themselves, as was alleged but found unsubstantiated in a special counsel investigation of Bill Clinton in the 1990s.

Quote:If it’s randomly drawn, why doesn’t each judge have the same chance of getting the case?

There are many reasons, some simple, some less so.

The main reason is that eight of 21 federal trial judges in Washington are on semiretired or “senior” status. Although all senior judges stepped up to take full caseloads after the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack to help colleagues manage the flood of more than 1,000 criminal cases, they remain eligible and some have elected to take reduced caseloads after age 65. That means they are less likely than colleagues to land a new case. Up to 20 judges, including seven senior judges, are taking new criminal cases.

Quote:What does card-counting have to do with picking trump’s trial judge?

In short, the odds for any given judge to draw a case can depend on their existing caseload, and how many new cases they have recently drawn.

Court officials liken the case drawing process to a “wheel” spun to assign each new case to a judge. In practice, the process works more like drawing from a deck of cards, in which each judge is their own suit, with a number of cards equal to the number of cases they can draw before the case-assignment deck is reshuffled and reloaded.

How trump’s Jan. 6 trial judge Tanya S. Chutkan was randomly selected

(08-03-2023 02:31 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Some more information:

Quote:How was trump’s trial judge chosen?

By random draw. But not every judge had an equal chance of getting the case. By court rule, cases are assigned through a random process intended to prevent prosecutors from judge-shopping in pursuit of a friendlier forum, or judges from steering cases among themselves, as was alleged but found unsubstantiated in a special counsel investigation of Bill Clinton in the 1990s.

Quote:If it’s randomly drawn, why doesn’t each judge have the same chance of getting the case?

There are many reasons, some simple, some less so.

The main reason is that eight of 21 federal trial judges in Washington are on semiretired or “senior” status. Although all senior judges stepped up to take full caseloads after the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack to help colleagues manage the flood of more than 1,000 criminal cases, they remain eligible and some have elected to take reduced caseloads after age 65. That means they are less likely than colleagues to land a new case. Up to 20 judges, including seven senior judges, are taking new criminal cases.

Quote:What does card-counting have to do with picking trump’s trial judge?

In short, the odds for any given judge to draw a case can depend on their existing caseload, and how many new cases they have recently drawn.

Court officials liken the case drawing process to a “wheel” spun to assign each new case to a judge. In practice, the process works more like drawing from a deck of cards, in which each judge is their own suit, with a number of cards equal to the number of cases they can draw before the case-assignment deck is reshuffled and reloaded.

How trump’s Jan. 6 trial judge Tanya S. Chutkan was randomly selected

Because this kinda shite is never rigged by filth.

What a shiteshow

Tanya

Shere continues to be detached from reality.

(08-03-2023 02:43 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-03-2023 02:31 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Some more information:

Quote:How was trump’s trial judge chosen?

By random draw. But not every judge had an equal chance of getting the case. By court rule, cases are assigned through a random process intended to prevent prosecutors from judge-shopping in pursuit of a friendlier forum, or judges from steering cases among themselves, as was alleged but found unsubstantiated in a special counsel investigation of Bill Clinton in the 1990s.

Quote:If it’s randomly drawn, why doesn’t each judge have the same chance of getting the case?

There are many reasons, some simple, some less so.

The main reason is that eight of 21 federal trial judges in Washington are on semiretired or “senior” status. Although all senior judges stepped up to take full caseloads after the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack to help colleagues manage the flood of more than 1,000 criminal cases, they remain eligible and some have elected to take reduced caseloads after age 65. That means they are less likely than colleagues to land a new case. Up to 20 judges, including seven senior judges, are taking new criminal cases.

Quote:What does card-counting have to do with picking trump’s trial judge?

In short, the odds for any given judge to draw a case can depend on their existing caseload, and how many new cases they have recently drawn.

Court officials liken the case drawing process to a “wheel” spun to assign each new case to a judge. In practice, the process works more like drawing from a deck of cards, in which each judge is their own suit, with a number of cards equal to the number of cases they can draw before the case-assignment deck is reshuffled and reloaded.

How trump’s Jan. 6 trial judge Tanya S. Chutkan was randomly selected

Because this kinda shite is never rigged by filth.

What a shiteshow

Tanya

Funny how these things only seem to go one way, Hunh?

1 of 22, clearly just another wild-asss coincidence, I'm sure.

Shere is the one detached from reality?

LOL LOL LOL

Ummm okay? And the judge in the documents case was appointed by Trump. Should both of them have to recuse themselves?

(08-03-2023 02:43 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-03-2023 02:31 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Some more information:

Quote:How was trump’s trial judge chosen?

By random draw. But not every judge had an equal chance of getting the case. By court rule, cases are assigned through a random process intended to prevent prosecutors from judge-shopping in pursuit of a friendlier forum, or judges from steering cases among themselves, as was alleged but found unsubstantiated in a special counsel investigation of Bill Clinton in the 1990s.

Quote:If it’s randomly drawn, why doesn’t each judge have the same chance of getting the case?

There are many reasons, some simple, some less so.

The main reason is that eight of 21 federal trial judges in Washington are on semiretired or “senior” status. Although all senior judges stepped up to take full caseloads after the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack to help colleagues manage the flood of more than 1,000 criminal cases, they remain eligible and some have elected to take reduced caseloads after age 65. That means they are less likely than colleagues to land a new case. Up to 20 judges, including seven senior judges, are taking new criminal cases.

Quote:What does card-counting have to do with picking trump’s trial judge?

In short, the odds for any given judge to draw a case can depend on their existing caseload, and how many new cases they have recently drawn.

Court officials liken the case drawing process to a “wheel” spun to assign each new case to a judge. In practice, the process works more like drawing from a deck of cards, in which each judge is their own suit, with a number of cards equal to the number of cases they can draw before the case-assignment deck is reshuffled and reloaded.

How trump’s Jan. 6 trial judge Tanya S. Chutkan was randomly selected

Because this kinda shite is never rigged by filth.

What a shiteshow

Tanya

Explain Cannon in Florida, you half-wit!

(08-03-2023 03:49 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-03-2023 02:43 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-03-2023 02:31 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Some more information:

Quote:How was trump’s trial judge chosen?

By random draw. But not every judge had an equal chance of getting the case. By court rule, cases are assigned through a random process intended to prevent prosecutors from judge-shopping in pursuit of a friendlier forum, or judges from steering cases among themselves, as was alleged but found unsubstantiated in a special counsel investigation of Bill Clinton in the 1990s.

Quote:If it’s randomly drawn, why doesn’t each judge have the same chance of getting the case?

There are many reasons, some simple, some less so.

The main reason is that eight of 21 federal trial judges in Washington are on semiretired or “senior” status. Although all senior judges stepped up to take full caseloads after the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack to help colleagues manage the flood of more than 1,000 criminal cases, they remain eligible and some have elected to take reduced caseloads after age 65. That means they are less likely than colleagues to land a new case. Up to 20 judges, including seven senior judges, are taking new criminal cases.

Quote:What does card-counting have to do with picking trump’s trial judge?

In short, the odds for any given judge to draw a case can depend on their existing caseload, and how many new cases they have recently drawn.

Court officials liken the case drawing process to a “wheel” spun to assign each new case to a judge. In practice, the process works more like drawing from a deck of cards, in which each judge is their own suit, with a number of cards equal to the number of cases they can draw before the case-assignment deck is reshuffled and reloaded.

How trump’s Jan. 6 trial judge Tanya S. Chutkan was randomly selected

Because this kinda shite is never rigged by filth.

What a shiteshow

Tanya

Explain Cannon in Florida, you half-wit!

YumYumDNC is getting mad.......

(08-03-2023 03:49 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-03-2023 02:43 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-03-2023 02:31 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Some more information:

Quote:How was trump’s trial judge chosen?

By random draw. But not every judge had an equal chance of getting the case. By court rule, cases are assigned through a random process intended to prevent prosecutors from judge-shopping in pursuit of a friendlier forum, or judges from steering cases among themselves, as was alleged but found unsubstantiated in a special counsel investigation of Bill Clinton in the 1990s.

Quote:If it’s randomly drawn, why doesn’t each judge have the same chance of getting the case?

There are many reasons, some simple, some less so.

The main reason is that eight of 21 federal trial judges in Washington are on semiretired or “senior” status. Although all senior judges stepped up to take full caseloads after the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack to help colleagues manage the flood of more than 1,000 criminal cases, they remain eligible and some have elected to take reduced caseloads after age 65. That means they are less likely than colleagues to land a new case. Up to 20 judges, including seven senior judges, are taking new criminal cases.

Quote:What does card-counting have to do with picking trump’s trial judge?

In short, the odds for any given judge to draw a case can depend on their existing caseload, and how many new cases they have recently drawn.

Court officials liken the case drawing process to a “wheel” spun to assign each new case to a judge. In practice, the process works more like drawing from a deck of cards, in which each judge is their own suit, with a number of cards equal to the number of cases they can draw before the case-assignment deck is reshuffled and reloaded.

How trump’s Jan. 6 trial judge Tanya S. Chutkan was randomly selected

Because this kinda shite is never rigged by filth.

What a shiteshow

Tanya

Explain Cannon in Florida, you half-wit!

Filth made a mistake.

yumyum stays mad

all the prog filth stay mad

all the time

(08-03-2023 02:48 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(08-03-2023 02:43 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-03-2023 02:31 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Some more information:

Quote:How was trump’s trial judge chosen?

By random draw. But not every judge had an equal chance of getting the case. By court rule, cases are assigned through a random process intended to prevent prosecutors from judge-shopping in pursuit of a friendlier forum, or judges from steering cases among themselves, as was alleged but found unsubstantiated in a special counsel investigation of Bill Clinton in the 1990s.

Quote:If it’s randomly drawn, why doesn’t each judge have the same chance of getting the case?

There are many reasons, some simple, some less so.

The main reason is that eight of 21 federal trial judges in Washington are on semiretired or “senior” status. Although all senior judges stepped up to take full caseloads after the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack to help colleagues manage the flood of more than 1,000 criminal cases, they remain eligible and some have elected to take reduced caseloads after age 65. That means they are less likely than colleagues to land a new case. Up to 20 judges, including seven senior judges, are taking new criminal cases.

Quote:What does card-counting have to do with picking trump’s trial judge?

In short, the odds for any given judge to draw a case can depend on their existing caseload, and how many new cases they have recently drawn.

Court officials liken the case drawing process to a “wheel” spun to assign each new case to a judge. In practice, the process works more like drawing from a deck of cards, in which each judge is their own suit, with a number of cards equal to the number of cases they can draw before the case-assignment deck is reshuffled and reloaded.

How trump’s Jan. 6 trial judge Tanya S. Chutkan was randomly selected

Because this kinda shite is never rigged by filth.

What a shiteshow

Tanya

Funny how these things only seem to go one way, Hunh?

1 of 22, clearly just another wild-asss coincidence, I'm sure.

Trump getting Cannon in Florida certainly blows your razor sharp analysis out of the water.

(08-03-2023 02:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-03-2023 01:56 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(08-03-2023 07:08 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-02-2023 05:43 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  So what that she worked for Boies Schiller? And so what that Hunter previously worked there?

Is the new rule that any attorney that worked for any law firm that employed any person with any political tie is suspect? Seroiusly?

Or are you just limiting the rank speculation to Hunter?

Or should we extend this tenuous connection paradigm to Ailleen Cannon and her work at Gibson Dunn?

Sorry, that is a real thin stretch, #s.

That old man lost any credibility he had years ago when he became nothing more than a sycophant to the trolls here. Sad.

So an honest question; who chose this judge?

Pretty sure it's all random draws.

Quote:A single computer inside a first-floor office in the fluorescent-lit, gray hallway of the courthouse near Capitol Hill likely placed trump's four-count indictment in Chutkan's courtroom.

The clerk's office at the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia is home to the "wheel" for federal cases in Washington, a computerized random selection process that assigns new cases to any of the 22 federal district judges who preside in Washington.

The device, which a court official says only functions to assign cases, is a modern-day spin on an old way to allocate cases. In prior years in federal courthouses across the country, a clerk would manually select from a wooden wheel that held cards with the names of the court's judges.

What to know about Tanya Chutkan, the judge randomly assigned to trump's Jan. 6 case

“Likely”

Gotta love the language.

(08-03-2023 03:24 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  Ummm okay? And the judge in the documents case was appointed by Trump. Should both of them have to recuse themselves?

Well one is in Florida and many experts (Gin Breath not included here) have said it is a very weak case. Likely to not get a conviction on the merits once tried, if it ever gets to trial.
The other is in DC where Trump is already guilty and on his way to jail (house arrest). Hard for Trump to campaign from his living room.
So my guess is they will not want to be made a fool of in Florida so they drag that out past the election and pursue the DC charges as fast as they can.
As some here say, pure filth.

(08-03-2023 04:54 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-03-2023 02:48 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(08-03-2023 02:43 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-03-2023 02:31 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Some more information:

Quote:How was trump’s trial judge chosen?

By random draw. But not every judge had an equal chance of getting the case. By court rule, cases are assigned through a random process intended to prevent prosecutors from judge-shopping in pursuit of a friendlier forum, or judges from steering cases among themselves, as was alleged but found unsubstantiated in a special counsel investigation of Bill Clinton in the 1990s.

Quote:If it’s randomly drawn, why doesn’t each judge have the same chance of getting the case?

There are many reasons, some simple, some less so.

The main reason is that eight of 21 federal trial judges in Washington are on semiretired or “senior” status. Although all senior judges stepped up to take full caseloads after the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack to help colleagues manage the flood of more than 1,000 criminal cases, they remain eligible and some have elected to take reduced caseloads after age 65. That means they are less likely than colleagues to land a new case. Up to 20 judges, including seven senior judges, are taking new criminal cases.

Quote:What does card-counting have to do with picking trump’s trial judge?

In short, the odds for any given judge to draw a case can depend on their existing caseload, and how many new cases they have recently drawn.

Court officials liken the case drawing process to a “wheel” spun to assign each new case to a judge. In practice, the process works more like drawing from a deck of cards, in which each judge is their own suit, with a number of cards equal to the number of cases they can draw before the case-assignment deck is reshuffled and reloaded.

How trump’s Jan. 6 trial judge Tanya S. Chutkan was randomly selected

Because this kinda shite is never rigged by filth.

What a shiteshow

Tanya

Funny how these things only seem to go one way, Hunh?

1 of 22, clearly just another wild-asss coincidence, I'm sure.

Trump getting Cannon in Florida certainly blows your razor sharp analysis out of the water.

Only problem there Clarence is Florida isn’t DC.

(08-03-2023 06:08 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(08-03-2023 04:54 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-03-2023 02:48 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(08-03-2023 02:43 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-03-2023 02:31 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Some more information:



How trump’s Jan. 6 trial judge Tanya S. Chutkan was randomly selected

Because this kinda shite is never rigged by filth.

What a shiteshow

Tanya

Funny how these things only seem to go one way, Hunh?

1 of 22, clearly just another wild-asss coincidence, I'm sure.

Trump getting Cannon in Florida certainly blows your razor sharp analysis out of the water.

Only problem there Clarence is Florida isn’t DC.

I take it you dont understand the word 'only'. Seems to be a real dearth of cognition on basic English on this board today.

Quote:To give you an idea of just how unfair Judge Chutkan is when dealing with conservatives...

In the four January 6th cases in which prosecutors did NOT seek any jail time, Judge Chutkan still ordered jail times ranging from 14 days to 45 days.

Overall, one-third of the J6 defendants have received zero jail time. But of the 38 defendants whose cases Chutkan has handled, ALL of them received jail or prison time.

Associated Press has described her as the "number one punisher" of J6 defendants.

And now, she only gave Trump's legal team 1 business day to respond to Jack Smith's proposed gag order, ignoring the standard 14-day rule to respond to motions.

There's no way Trump gets a fair trial in front of this activist judge.

(08-07-2023 11:43 AM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

Quote:To give you an idea of just how unfair Judge Chutkan is when dealing with conservatives...

In the four January 6th cases in which prosecutors did NOT seek any jail time, Judge Chutkan still ordered jail times ranging from 14 days to 45 days.

Overall, one-third of the J6 defendants have received zero jail time. But of the 38 defendants whose cases Chutkan has handled, ALL of them received jail or prison time.

Associated Press has described her as the "number one punisher" of J6 defendants.

And now, she only gave Trump's legal team 1 business day to respond to Jack Smith's proposed gag order, ignoring the standard 14-day rule to respond to motions.

There's no way Trump gets a fair trial in front of this activist judge.

Yawn. I'd be all for it to be much easier to have judges removed from cases with obvious political bias, but LOL that conservatives want that in any other case but specifically this one instance. Not even all instances of Trump cases as they certainly don't think Cannon should be removed.

(08-07-2023 11:43 AM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

Quote:To give you an idea of just how unfair Judge Chutkan is when dealing with conservatives...

In the four January 6th cases in which prosecutors did NOT seek any jail time, Judge Chutkan still ordered jail times ranging from 14 days to 45 days.

Overall, one-third of the J6 defendants have received zero jail time. But of the 38 defendants whose cases Chutkan has handled, ALL of them received jail or prison time.

Associated Press has described her as the "number one punisher" of J6 defendants.

And now, she only gave Trump's legal team 1 business day to respond to Jack Smith's proposed gag order, ignoring the standard 14-day rule to respond to motions.

There's no way Trump gets a fair trial in front of this activist judge.

It doesnt matter.