On3 attempts a team rankings of transfer portal commitments.

https://www.on3.com/transfer-portal/team...ball/2023/


Rankings go to 69 ... here's the top ten:

1 - Louisville
2 - Colorado
3 - USC
4 - UCLA
5 - Auburn
6 - LSU
7 - Arkansas
8 - Miami
9 - Florida State
10 - Wisconsin

You might want to add 'Football' to the title.

Mike Norvell turned FSU around pretty quickly through the Portal.

(05-26-2023 05:35 PM)ChrisLords Wrote:  You might want to add 'Football' to the title.

Done.

We have the right Man for the job in Jeff Brohm!

It's surprising that Louisville did better than Colorado. Deion brought in 50ish players. For some reason the link doesn't show Colorado in 2nd any more. It just goes 1 3 4 5 6 etc.

(05-27-2023 04:56 PM)ChrisLords Wrote:  It's surprising that Louisville did better than Colorado. Deion brought in 50ish players. For some reason the link doesn't show Colorado in 2nd any more. It just goes 1 3 4 5 6 etc.

I just wonder if there is just more Hype with Deion or will He be a superstar in NCAA Football then off to the Cowboys

(05-27-2023 04:56 PM)ChrisLords Wrote:  It's surprising that Louisville did better than Colorado. Deion brought in 50ish players. For some reason the link doesn't show Colorado in 2nd any more. It just goes 1 3 4 5 6 etc.

If Colorado brought in "50ish" players, how come they are only 2nd?

(05-29-2023 08:09 PM)ken d Wrote:  

(05-27-2023 04:56 PM)ChrisLords Wrote:  It's surprising that Louisville did better than Colorado. Deion brought in 50ish players. For some reason the link doesn't show Colorado in 2nd any more. It just goes 1 3 4 5 6 etc.

If Colorado brought in "50ish" players, how come they are only 2nd?

They're back in the rankings BTW.
Probably because they were mostly 3 stars.

2 Colorado Brought in 1 5-star, 5 4-stars, lost 1 4-star, brought in 40 3-stars and lost 47 3-stars.

Whatever methodology they used, they were second to Louisville.

(05-29-2023 08:22 PM)ChrisLords Wrote:  

(05-29-2023 08:09 PM)ken d Wrote:  

(05-27-2023 04:56 PM)ChrisLords Wrote:  It's surprising that Louisville did better than Colorado. Deion brought in 50ish players. For some reason the link doesn't show Colorado in 2nd any more. It just goes 1 3 4 5 6 etc.

If Colorado brought in "50ish" players, how come they are only 2nd?

They're back in the rankings BTW.
Probably because they were mostly 3 stars.

2 Colorado Brought in 1 5-star, 5 4-stars, lost 1 4-star, brought in 40 3-stars and lost 47 3-stars.

Whatever methodology they used, they were second to Louisville.

I've had the impression that it wasn't so much that they "lost" 47 3-stars as it was that they ran them off and told them to go somewhere else.

I have to wonder how a coaching staff can come in cold and almost immediately decide that many players weren't worth keeping while also on short notice decide 40 players on other teams were better. If this coach and his assistants prove to be that good at sizing up talent, what are the odds they will still be at Colorado for more than a couple of years?

(05-30-2023 07:45 AM)ken d Wrote:  

(05-29-2023 08:22 PM)ChrisLords Wrote:  

(05-29-2023 08:09 PM)ken d Wrote:  

(05-27-2023 04:56 PM)ChrisLords Wrote:  It's surprising that Louisville did better than Colorado. Deion brought in 50ish players. For some reason the link doesn't show Colorado in 2nd any more. It just goes 1 3 4 5 6 etc.

If Colorado brought in "50ish" players, how come they are only 2nd?

They're back in the rankings BTW.
Probably because they were mostly 3 stars.

2 Colorado Brought in 1 5-star, 5 4-stars, lost 1 4-star, brought in 40 3-stars and lost 47 3-stars.

Whatever methodology they used, they were second to Louisville.

I've had the impression that it wasn't so much that they "lost" 47 3-stars as it was that they ran them off and told them to go somewhere else.

I have to wonder how a coaching staff can come in cold and almost immediately decide that many players weren't worth keeping while also on short notice decide 40 players on other teams were better. If this coach and his assistants prove to be that good at sizing up talent, what are the odds they will still be at Colorado for more than a couple of years?

If they ARE that good at evaluating talent, the rest of college football should just give up right now! (Hint: I don't think they're that good)