Cincinnati Bearcats

Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Long Term Realignment
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
Z-Fly Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,981
Joined: Jul 2017
Reputation: 138
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location: Finneytown
Post: #1
Long Term Realignment
I've been trying to wrap my head where this is all going. I can't make much sense of it. Conferences going coast to coast just seem awful for all involved, except for the TV People.

Try to remove the emotional attachment to your team. If the long term goal is going to a pro-style setup. How does it not make sense to go to something like, 4 new conferences separated by Geography (South/Central/North/South)? Then also drop any schools that might be perceived as dead weight. Logically, it makes the most sense to me.

What am I missing? Too many politics involved to make that happen? TV Deals? Naming rights? Trying to pretend that it isn't actually a Pro-League?
 
07-29-2022 09:49 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Captain Bearcat Offline
All-American in Everything
*

Posts: 9,512
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 768
I Root For: UC
Location: IL & Cincinnati, USA
Post: #2
RE: Long Term Realignment
There is no long-term plan that everyone agrees on. There is no Master Plan.

The leagues are in competition with each other. They are just trying to one-up each other and build the best possible conference for themselves that they can. Everyone is following their own self interest.

There is certainly no quest to make this a pro league. Quite the opposite, in fact: they are trying to preserve the image of amateurism as long as they can.


The Big Ten would have been insane if they didn't try to court USC because USC is a top-5 brand that will boost the revenue of each Big Ten school by 5-10 million per year. Also, it gives Big Ten schools an advantage in marketing to students on the West Coast. The fact that USC showed interest is not part of some secret master plan. It's much simpler than that: USC decided it was in their own self-interest to join the Big Ten.

If there was a Master Plan, they would cooperate on playoff expansion. Instead, there is very public bickering and the only actions that are taken are once a decade, and are exactly on the path of least resistance (from bowl system, to Bowl Coalition, to BCS system, to today's BCS+1 system)

If there was a Master Plan, the P2 wouldn't have zero teams in New York, zero teams in New England, and only one team in Florida.

If there was a Master Plan, the P2 wouldn't waste four precious spots on relatively low-revenue teams in Mississippi and Indiana.
 
07-29-2022 12:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.