Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Oil Price Cap = Russian Dilemma
Author Message
BlueDragon Away
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,237
Joined: Jan 2021
Reputation: 835
I Root For: TSU
Location:
Post: #1
Oil Price Cap = Russian Dilemma
https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/...r-End.html

Apparently Russians unlike our Government don’t like losing money. However will they continue their war unless there is a black market to support them ?!?!?
07-21-2022 10:11 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Jugnaut Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,875
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 482
I Root For: UCF
Location: Florida
Post: #2
RE: Oil Price Cap = Russian Dilemma
(07-21-2022 10:11 AM)BlueDragon Wrote:  https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/...r-End.html

Apparently Russians unlike our Government don’t like losing money. However will they continue their war unless there is a black market to support them ?!?!?

A price cap won't work because China and India and a ton of other countries will keep buying their oil. Russia makes more money off oil the more we sanction and drive up the price.
07-21-2022 11:42 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bear Catlett Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 13,039
Joined: Jan 2020
Reputation: 1555
I Root For: UC
Location:
Post: #3
RE: Oil Price Cap = Russian Dilemma
Whatever the question is, the answer is always the same...

Biden will find a way to F it up.
07-21-2022 11:47 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


VA49er Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 29,134
Joined: Dec 2004
Reputation: 985
I Root For: Charlotte
Location:
Post: #4
RE: Oil Price Cap = Russian Dilemma
Does it really matter when the two most populated nations on the planet will not care about a price cap?
07-21-2022 11:49 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Todor Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 9,012
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation: 949
I Root For: New Mexico State
Location:
Post: #5
RE: Oil Price Cap = Russian Dilemma
After a quick glance at a map of the world, it looks to me that the entire “international community” is on board with anti Russian sanctions.

https://www.bing.com/images/search?view=...t=1&sim=11
07-22-2022 04:28 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


ericsrevenge76 Away
Jesus is coming soon
*

Posts: 21,679
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation: 3340
I Root For: The Kingdom
Location: The Body of Christ
Post: #6
RE: Oil Price Cap = Russian Dilemma
It really is amazing, here we are funding both sides and crushing our economy and middle class all at the same time.
07-22-2022 04:31 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UofMstateU Online
Legend
*

Posts: 39,283
Joined: Dec 2009
Reputation: 3586
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #7
RE: Oil Price Cap = Russian Dilemma
All we have to do is to pump more oil ourselves and it will drop the price and Putin wont make nearly s much money and the war will get too expensive for them real quick.

But leave it to the dipsh*t party that thinks "manipulating" the price is a good idea. They always do.
07-22-2022 07:52 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


MemTigers1998 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,297
Joined: May 2017
Reputation: 1904
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #8
RE: Oil Price Cap = Russian Dilemma
(07-21-2022 11:47 AM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  Whatever the question is, the answer is always the same...

Biden will find a way to F it up.


Always
07-22-2022 08:47 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Owl 69/70/75 Offline
Just an old rugby coach
*

Posts: 80,845
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3211
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX

DonatorsNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #9
RE: Oil Price Cap = Russian Dilemma
(07-22-2022 04:31 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  It really is amazing, here we are funding both sides and crushing our economy and middle class all at the same time.

And we have an opposition party that cannot find it in their being to enunciate precisely that.

I think republicans have a tremendous opportunity to become the party of common sense in the George Friedman struggle between elite experts and common sense. They have the opportunity to become the party of small business and the working middle class against the party of the elite experts and the non-working welfare class--the middle versus the two extremes.

But they have consistently refused to take it since Jack Kemp was pushing that message 30 years ago. I thought one of the saddest things for republicans was that GHWB and Kemp could not get along, and in fact disliked each other intensely. Kemp would have been a far better running mate for GHWB than the much-maligned Dan Quayle, and a team where GHWB took care of foreign policy and Kemp handled domestic policy would have been a pretty formidable combination.

As someone who liked both men, it bothered me that Bush and Kemp simply could not get along, and I've thought long and hard about it over the years. But now it makes sense. Establishment silk-stocking republicans hate ordinary people. They just do. They are extremely uncomfortable with populists like Donald Trump, for example. They would rather see Joe Biden as president than Donald Trump as head of the republican party.

I think the republicans are going to do worse in November than the crushing landslide that many expect--and that, frankly, should happen based on the incompetence of Biden and his administration. Maybe that will wake them up. They should take the house, but the senate is going to be horse of a different color. With 20 republican seats up, versus 14 democrats, the odds make it hard for them not to lose a seat or two, net. And that means two years of extreme leftist socialist/communist judges and federal administrators. If the republican majority in the house materializes, and if they act like an opposition and resist instead of turning into Milquetoast Mitch and John Boehner, we can survive, badly but survive. I have pretty much zero confidence in Kevin McCarthy's ability to lead a resistance, but maybe he will grow into it. I despise Pelosi and Schumer, but I am way past ready to see republican leaders with their cojones and chutzpah.

The scenario of what to do about Biden is interesting. Unless he actually croaks, the democrats probably will not replace him before the election, as that would be an admission of defeat on the order of George McGovern's replacing Thomas Eagleton. If the election is a crushing republican landslide, there may be considerable movement to eject him under the 25th Amendment before the end of the year, in the hope of getting a VP replacement confirmed before republicans take over congress. If republicans are smart, they would vote against such a move in that time frame, and hope to get a few democrats to defect and join them. The VP replacement would require a majority approval in both houses, which gets more difficult after the first of the year assuming republicans take at least one house. There was speculation at one time that democrats would wait until after January 20, so that Harris could stand for re-election in 2024 and 2028, but at this point I think she is so obviously a horrible candidate that those thoughts are long gone. Whoever she selects as her VP is probably the heir apparent. Therefore I think it is extremely important for republicans to oppose whoever Harris nominates. Or perhaps better, put together a list of whom they might support (Manchin perhaps, but Sinema is a bit too goofy to include in my estimation, and maybe a few republicans) and give it to Harris with the statement that anybody else is a no go. If she goes through two years with no VP, then in case anything happens to her it would revert to the speaker of the house, presumably McCarthy, but if there is anyone that I think is not up to it, he would be the one.

That's the way I see it. It's not an optimistic outlook, but we as a nation may have survived worse.
07-22-2022 08:47 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TigerBlue4Ever Online
Unapologetic A-hole
*

Posts: 72,844
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation: 5856
I Root For: yo mama
Location: is everything
Post: #10
RE: Oil Price Cap = Russian Dilemma
(07-22-2022 08:47 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(07-22-2022 04:31 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  It really is amazing, here we are funding both sides and crushing our economy and middle class all at the same time.

And we have an opposition party that cannot find it in their being to enunciate precisely that.

I think republicans have a tremendous opportunity to become the party of common sense in the George Friedman struggle between elite experts and common sense. They have the opportunity to become the party of small business and the working middle class against the party of the elite experts and the non-working welfare class--the middle versus the two extremes.

But they have consistently refused to take it since Jack Kemp was pushing that message 30 years ago. I thought one of the saddest things for republicans was that GHWB and Kemp could not get along, and in fact disliked each other intensely. Kemp would have been a far better running mate for GHWB than the much-maligned Dan Quayle, and a team where GHWB took care of foreign policy and Kemp handled domestic policy would have been a pretty formidable combination.

As someone who liked both men, it bothered me that Bush and Kemp simply could not get along, and I've thought long and hard about it over the years. But now it makes sense. Establishment silk-stocking republicans hate ordinary people. They just do. They are extremely uncomfortable with populists like Donald Trump, for example. They would rather see Joe Biden as president than Donald Trump as head of the republican party.

I think the republicans are going to do worse in November than the crushing landslide that many expect--and that, frankly, should happen based on the incompetence of Biden and his administration. Maybe that will wake them up. They should take the house, but the senate is going to be horse of a different color. With 20 republican seats up, versus 14 democrats, the odds make it hard for them not to lose a seat or two, net. And that means two years of extreme leftist socialist/communist judges and federal administrators. If the republican majority in the house materializes, and if they act like an opposition and resist instead of turning into Milquetoast Mitch and John Boehner, we can survive, badly but survive. I have pretty much zero confidence in Kevin McCarthy's ability to lead a resistance, but maybe he will grow into it. I despise Pelosi and Schumer, but I am way past ready to see republican leaders with their cojones and chutzpah.

The scenario of what to do about Biden is interesting. Unless he actually croaks, the democrats probably will not replace him before the election, as that would be an admission of defeat on the order of George McGovern's replacing Thomas Eagleton. If the election is a crushing republican landslide, there may be considerable movement to eject him under the 25th Amendment before the end of the year, in the hope of getting a VP replacement confirmed before republicans take over congress. If republicans are smart, they would vote against such a move in that time frame, and hope to get a few democrats to defect and join them. The VP replacement would require a majority approval in both houses, which gets more difficult after the first of the year assuming republicans take at least one house. There was speculation at one time that democrats would wait until after January 20, so that Harris could stand for re-election in 2024 and 2028, but at this point I think she is so obviously a horrible candidate that those thoughts are long gone. Whoever she selects as her VP is probably the heir apparent. Therefore I think it is extremely important for republicans to oppose whoever Harris nominates. Or perhaps better, put together a list of whom they might support (Manchin perhaps, but Sinema is a bit too goofy to include in my estimation, and maybe a few republicans) and give it to Harris with the statement that anybody else is a no go. If she goes through two years with no VP, then in case anything happens to her it would revert to the speaker of the house, presumably McCarthy, but if there is anyone that I think is not up to it, he would be the one.

That's the way I see it. It's not an optimistic outlook, but we as a nation may have survived worse.

Thanks, that was interesting to read.
07-22-2022 10:07 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.