And maybe the guy in Politico isn't as extreme in his position as I believe. This article makes it seem like its Biden*'s position.
https://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2022/03/...s-n1583519
“"...The only end game now,” a senior administration official was heard to say at a private event earlier this month, “is the end of Putin regime. Until then, all the time Putin stays, [Russia] will be a pariah state that will never be welcomed back into the community of nations....
We have the basis for a peace deal, but Biden’s harsh rhetoric leaves no room for compromise on either side.
It’s one thing to keep Ukraine supplied with antitank and antiaircraft missiles, and I think we should give them all they can use. That’s the stick.
The carrot should be peace talks aimed at neutralizing Ukraine (as Kyiv has already agreed to in principle), protections or even border realignments for Russian-majority areas, and relaxing (but not removing) sanctions so long as an effective ceasefire holds.
But that’s not what Biden is doing. Instead, he’s talking publically about war crimes and privately about regime change.
Vladimir Putin has been informed reliably by the Western alliance that his exit — which in his case possibly includes a firing squad — is the price for peace.
Instead of building Putin a golden bridge to peace, Biden has backed him into a corner and dared him to lash out.
That’s the idiot’s way to start World War III, but from Joe Biden, what else did you expect?"