(02-03-2022 08:37 PM)justinhub2003 Wrote: The reason he was given a 5 year Ban was because he lied and tried to cover up the infractions. The NCAA has been much more merciful in situations where the guilty party was forthcoming about the issues. Sampson was not. To me, that was the biggest issue with his cheating case not the actual cheating
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
this is also bs.. the ncaa has never been merciful
the majority of ncaa cases/sanctions are from being forthcoming,..the ncaa doesn't have investigation units to uncover anything, most infractions are self-reported
---look at what killed smu with larry brown.. a student tutor (on staff) cheated for a player that wasnt even in the rotation.. and it was the tutor who did it of her own free will, and wasn't asked too (wasnt paid for it or anything) was just a favor because they were friends..
larry also initially said he didn't talk to the player since the incident , but then larry came back 5mins later and said, he just remembered that he did see him
that is the entirety of the smu case in which they were found guilty off.. the book was THROWN at smu, one of the hardest basketball punishments ever
--- UConn was extremely forthcoming with the ollie infraction in an attempt to claim cause...which was just using a friends gym to practice ..they were given multiyear probation and vacated wins
-- oklahoma st current postseason ban is based on a $300 loan in which the player paid back n 2017, from an assistant that has absolutely nothing to do with the current staff, and not tied to a single current player
in which Oklahoma state was extremely forthcoming and self-imposed sanctions in 2018!!
the part i bolded is not grounded in reality..the ncaa loves to throw the book at forthcoming people