We went from “never negotiate with terrorists” to “role in the international community”.

Quote:The religious extremist terrorist group known as the Taliban has captured nearly 60 percent of Afghanistan due to the withdrawal of U.S. forces, but the Democrats only seem to have one concern about that, and that’s how the Taliban want to be seen by the rest of the world.

During a White House press conference, Press Secretary Jen Psaki began speaking about the advancements being made by the Taliban in Afghanistan and dropped this gem.

“The Taliban also has to make an assessment about what they want their role to be in the international community,” she said.

Here’s a fun fact: They already did settle on how they want to be looked at by the international community, and the choice they settled on was “terrorist.” This was done decades and decades ago as they’ve openly subjugated women, killed political dissidents, slaughtered homosexuals, and killed innocents by the thousands on thousands.

This is the group that conducted over a dozen massacre campaigns in which women were raped and citizens were cruelly tortured. They’re big into sex trafficking and will do violence against anyone who isn’t them, including aid workers.

They’re bigoted, racist, sexist, religious extremists, and they really don’t care what the international community thinks about them. If they had things their way, they would slaughter the international community and enslave anyone they didn’t kill. Terrorists are terrorists. End of story.

Yet Psaki and the Democrats have never had the will to call evil out for what it was unless it served some sort of political purpose for them. Right now, speaking to ill of anyone with a certain melanin level in the middle east is only going to anger voters in their party. They’re more than happy to pretend that the Taliban, currently conducting a blitzkrieg across Afghanistan, are willing participants of peaceful relations with other countries.

They aren’t. These people are evil. Full stop.

What’s worrisome is the fact that Psaki would say such a thing about these terrorists. Is the Democrat party willing to engage in some sort of negotiations with them? Are the Democrats actually willing to look at them as a legitimate governmental body? I thought we didn’t negotiate with terrorists.

Why would the Democrats be willing to do such a thing?

The Democrats are clueless or so blinded by their ideological conditioning that they actually see these terrorists as good people because they’re not blond-haired, blue-eyed, white boys from Kansas. They seem legitimately willing to consider them something they’re not; reasonable.

Link

Dear Paski,

Taliban already have made their intentions known throughout the International Community for past 2 plus Decades = those that don’t abide by their barbaric rules shouldn’t be alive.

P.S. You're giving gingers a bad name.

As long as they are only terrorizing other Afghans, its really not worth our money and blood to deal wtih.

when ya cannot control your border, why care about others…

as much money that is spent on intel, it’s a fk’n sin 9/11 ever happened…

They need to send social workers over there to help those taliban guys get in touch with their feelings.

(08-13-2021 11:22 AM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  They need to send social workers over there to help those taliban guys get in touch with their feelings.

BRILLIANT!

+3

Reagan negotiated with terrorists.

(08-16-2021 12:51 PM)Danforth Wrote:  Reagan negotiated with terrorists.

Whataboutreagan lol.

(08-16-2021 12:56 PM)Kyle Mack Wrote:  

(08-16-2021 12:51 PM)Danforth Wrote:  Reagan negotiated with terrorists.

Whataboutreagan lol.

dumbforth’s mother negotiated with his father too. She wanted $5 but he only wanted to pay $3.

(08-16-2021 12:51 PM)Danforth Wrote:  Reagan negotiated with terrorists.

But we aren't talking about Reagan, are we? If you have a point to make, say it, otherwise sit yo @ss back down at the kiddie table while the grown ups are talking.

(08-16-2021 01:06 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(08-16-2021 12:56 PM)Kyle Mack Wrote:  

(08-16-2021 12:51 PM)Danforth Wrote:  Reagan negotiated with terrorists.

Whataboutreagan lol.

dumbforth’s mother negotiated with his father too. She wanted $5 but he only wanted to pay $3.

At least I have a mother. You had two dads.

LOL!

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/01/world...ction.html


"Afghanistan’s president said he had not agreed to release up to 5,000 prisoners, as a deal between the United States and the Taliban appears to require."



My how quickly we forget the past.

(08-16-2021 12:51 PM)Danforth Wrote:  Reagan negotiated with terrorists.

He did and I lost a lot of respect for him after Beirut. That being said he was far better equipped than the OLD FOOL sitting in the WH at the present. This is the most pathetic unqualified candidate to ever hold the office, BAR NONE.

(08-17-2021 09:21 AM)BlueDragon Wrote:  

(08-16-2021 12:51 PM)Danforth Wrote:  Reagan negotiated with terrorists.

He did and I lost a lot of respect for him after Beirut. That being said he was far better equipped than the OLD FOOL sitting in the WH at the present. This is the most pathetic unqualified candidate to ever hold the office, BAR NONE.

What would you have done?

Would you have carried out Trump's peace deal or would you have sent yet another surge?