(04-03-2020 09:30 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Breaking now on the news.

Atkinson is the intelligence IG who received the fake whistleblower report, and likely help to screw it up. He also sent it to congress even though there was no "imminent" information in it.

Good. Unfortunately, its three years too late.

(04-04-2020 04:03 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(04-04-2020 03:31 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  He was only following the laws. He was damned if he do, and damn if he don't report this.

https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/07/int...e-changes/

Nah dude. He broke the law. He was part of the coup.

Take the red pill.

Your link is a site that peddles fake news.

(04-05-2020 12:24 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(04-04-2020 04:03 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(04-04-2020 03:31 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  He was only following the laws. He was damned if he do, and damn if he don't report this.

https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/07/int...e-changes/

Nah dude. He broke the law. He was part of the coup.

Take the red pill.

Your link is a site that peddles fake news.

David, you were doing so well with two straight coherent posts that were not irreparably damaged by your horrific grammar. But you are just wrong here. First, the rules were changed "last minute" to allow 2nd hand information to be part of a Whistleblower complaint. Second, that complaint is not delivered to Congress, nor specifically the head of the Intelligence Committee Adam ******* Shiff. That in itself renders the entire complaint invalid. Prove me wrong.

(04-04-2020 11:12 PM)Wade Holt Wrote:  I cringe at times when I see threads with this much ignorance in them.

Dear Diary

(04-05-2020 12:24 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(04-04-2020 04:03 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(04-04-2020 03:31 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  He was only following the laws. He was damned if he do, and damn if he don't report this.

https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/07/int...e-changes/

Nah dude. He broke the law. He was part of the coup.

Take the red pill.

Your link is a site that peddles fake news.

Specifically, what is fake about the article.

Banana Republic prog filth directed by dimwit obama in to sabotage a president. They should be in jail.

(04-04-2020 03:39 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(04-04-2020 03:31 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  He was only following the laws. He was damned if he do, and damn if he don't report this.

He actually BROKE the law multiple times, including helping to falsify the fake whistleblower report. Then, he refused to turn over pertinent materials to congress. The release to congress was also unauthorized.

Why do you even bother?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(04-04-2020 11:34 PM)ODUsmitty Wrote:  

(04-04-2020 11:12 PM)Wade Holt Wrote:  I cringe at times when I see threads with this much ignorance in them.

Either counter what other posters have stated with links, or STFU. Your ramblings without sources don't pass the AUP smell test, chode.

And either you put me on ignore or stop the "direct" personal attacks. Your ramblings without reason surely doesn't pass the AUP smell test. Obviously I hurt an ego. Par for the course.

Here's your link:
https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/...f-trumpism

(04-05-2020 01:59 PM)Wade Holt Wrote:  

(04-04-2020 11:34 PM)ODUsmitty Wrote:  

(04-04-2020 11:12 PM)Wade Holt Wrote:  I cringe at times when I see threads with this much ignorance in them.

Either counter what other posters have stated with links, or STFU. Your ramblings without sources don't pass the AUP smell test, chode.

And either you put me on ignore or stop the "direct" personal attacks. Your nonsense without reason don't pass the AUP smell test as well. Par for the course.

Triggered! No matter what screen name you try to use, you're triggered the same.

No truer words have ever been typed.

https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/...f-trumpism

[quote='Wade Holt' pid='16766270' dateline='1586113661']
No truer words have ever been typed.

Democrats hate America.

Fify

Not clicking that crap. Make an effort lazy prog filth. -3

(04-05-2020 01:59 PM)Wade Holt Wrote:  

(04-04-2020 11:34 PM)ODUsmitty Wrote:  

(04-04-2020 11:12 PM)Wade Holt Wrote:  I cringe at times when I see threads with this much ignorance in them.

Either counter what other posters have stated with links, or STFU. Your ramblings without sources don't pass the AUP smell test, chode.

And either you put me on ignore or stop the "direct" personal attacks. Your ramblings without reason surely doesn't pass the AUP smell test. Obviously I hurt an ego. Par for the course.

Here's your link:
https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/...f-trumpism

What the hell is that supposed to link to?

A January ‘16 where Atkinson isn’t even mentioned, nobody knew a damn thing about the pending coup attempt, Trump was one candidate among 37 or whatever that ridiculous number was. From some author no ones heard of, from a university no ones ever heard of.

Best try harder than that, skippy.

(04-05-2020 01:59 PM)Wade Holt Wrote:  

(04-04-2020 11:34 PM)ODUsmitty Wrote:  

(04-04-2020 11:12 PM)Wade Holt Wrote:  I cringe at times when I see threads with this much ignorance in them.

Either counter what other posters have stated with links, or STFU. Your ramblings without sources don't pass the AUP smell test, chode.

And either you put me on ignore or stop the "direct" personal attacks. Your ramblings without reason surely doesn't pass the AUP smell test. Obviously I hurt an ego. Par for the course.

Here's your link:
https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/...f-trumpism

When your link is an article that states "Trumpism appeals to a large group of anti-intellectual, conspiracy minded and alienated malcontents," it becomes clear that this is a propaganda piece and not an objective analysis.

Do better. Be better. If that's even possible.

To me, questioning so called experts, especially when they have repeatedly failed in their predictions, is the essence of liberal thinking and intellectualism. Democrats do the opposite and ask others to think for them.

(04-05-2020 09:22 PM)bullet Wrote:  To me, questioning so called experts, especially when they have repeatedly failed in their predictions, is the essence of liberal thinking and intellectualism. Democrats do the opposite and ask others to think for them.

Democrats don’t actually understand or practice ‘science’. They use the concept as a weapon without knowing the first thing about it.

(04-05-2020 08:35 PM)ODUsmitty Wrote:  

(04-05-2020 01:59 PM)Wade Holt Wrote:  

(04-04-2020 11:34 PM)ODUsmitty Wrote:  

(04-04-2020 11:12 PM)Wade Holt Wrote:  I cringe at times when I see threads with this much ignorance in them.

Either counter what other posters have stated with links, or STFU. Your ramblings without sources don't pass the AUP smell test, chode.

And either you put me on ignore or stop the "direct" personal attacks. Your ramblings without reason surely doesn't pass the AUP smell test. Obviously I hurt an ego. Par for the course.

Here's your link:
https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/...f-trumpism

When your link is an article that states "Trumpism appeals to a large group of anti-intellectual, conspiracy minded and alienated malcontents," it becomes clear that this is a propaganda piece and not an objective analysis.

Do better. Be better. If that's even possible.

It's only propaganda to those in the minority who oppose it.

(04-06-2020 12:03 AM)Wade Holt Wrote:  

(04-05-2020 08:35 PM)ODUsmitty Wrote:  

(04-05-2020 01:59 PM)Wade Holt Wrote:  

(04-04-2020 11:34 PM)ODUsmitty Wrote:  

(04-04-2020 11:12 PM)Wade Holt Wrote:  I cringe at times when I see threads with this much ignorance in them.

Either counter what other posters have stated with links, or STFU. Your ramblings without sources don't pass the AUP smell test, chode.

And either you put me on ignore or stop the "direct" personal attacks. Your ramblings without reason surely doesn't pass the AUP smell test. Obviously I hurt an ego. Par for the course.

Here's your link:
https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/...f-trumpism

When your link is an article that states "Trumpism appeals to a large group of anti-intellectual, conspiracy minded and alienated malcontents," it becomes clear that this is a propaganda piece and not an objective analysis.

Do better. Be better. If that's even possible.

It's only propaganda to those in the minority who oppose it.

Let's examine this comment, shall we Wade? So from your comment, if a majority feels an action is correct, than it is. A majority of Germans felt that the horrible atrocities against the German Jews were OK, so that was OK, too. How about the atrocities and genocide versus the Armenians by the Ottomans in WW1? Most Turks felt that was OK, as well. If your moral compass says that whatever polls better with the populace is the correct and moral thing to do, than you have just sanctioned mass genocide in both world wars.

You suck at this. Be better. *EDIT* If that is possible, which I am beginning to doubt.