(10-18-2019 04:12 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Doesn’t make much sense for her to do that...it’s career suicide. Amrash has his libertarian chops to fall back on. She’d be excommunicated from the DNC. She’s be done politically for what would amount to playing sideshow bob.

She of all people is in a tough spot. Ideologically she doesn't line up with the Democrats, what you say about a run on the Libertarian ticket is true, and she is from Hawaii which would never accept her if she switched to the Republican party.

(10-18-2019 04:12 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  She’d be excommunicated from the DNC.

And she's not now?

She is a crazy bitche

Ouch, this had to leave a mark on the wicked old witch.....

Quote:Rep. Tulsi Gabbard blasted Hillary Clinton Friday — calling the former first lady “the queen of warmongers” after Clinton implied the Russians were “grooming” the Hawaii congresswoman as an asset.

“Thank you @HillaryClinton,” tweeted Gabbard, who is vying to win the Democratic primary.

“You, the queen of warmongers, embodiment of corruption, and personification of the rot that has sickened the Democratic Party for so long, have finally come out from behind the curtain.”

Gabbard’s red-hot tweet came in response to Clinton earlier Friday implying that Russians were “grooming” the Hawaii congresswoman to give up her Democratic primary bid and run for president as a third-party candidate.

link

(10-18-2019 03:49 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(10-18-2019 11:56 AM)bullet Wrote:  https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/...e-election

Tulsi is a Russian asset now!

They need to not let Hillary out. Just put her in a strait jacket.

The question is why are the Democrats so afraid of Gabbard? Its not like she is top 3 or even top 6.

Is it because she isn't goosestepping with the others?

It's not irrational at all. It's very calculated. For one, it is a projection. Clearly Hillary has been the one with Russian ties and has tried to use a Russian disinformation campaign against Trump. Second, when all of the nut cases have run their course in the Democratic primary who stands in her way? Gabbard is one of the few voices of reason within the Democratic party and once Warren, Biden, and Sanders are all written off as unelectable it leaves a void for 2024 that somebody like a Tulsi Gabbard might fill.

So Hillary is trying to distract attention away from her own past sins and relationship with Russia and is simultaneously attacking one of the only credible democrats left in the field and one that might be a rising star in 2024.

Hillary is not insane. She is criminally immoral and narcissistic.

I doubt we see Hillary in 2020. She couldn't survive loosing to Trump twice. In 2024 she won't have to face Trump. The Democrats will be looking for a unifying figure and she may think, in spite of her age, that it is the optimum time for her next candidacy. Recent trends have been that the party vacating power after 8 years loses the next election. We'll see.

Agreed. Hillary wants to be the first female president... no way she'd ever let Tulsi have a chance of taking that crown. I'm saying it now so its on the record... if anything befalls Tulsi in the next few months to a year... The Clintons did it.

(10-18-2019 05:45 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

Ouch, this had to leave a mark on the wicked old witch.....

Quote:Rep. Tulsi Gabbard blasted Hillary Clinton Friday — calling the former first lady “the queen of warmongers” after Clinton implied the Russians were “grooming” the Hawaii congresswoman as an asset.

“Thank you @HillaryClinton,” tweeted Gabbard, who is vying to win the Democratic primary.

“You, the queen of warmongers, embodiment of corruption, and personification of the rot that has sickened the Democratic Party for so long, have finally come out from behind the curtain.”

Gabbard’s red-hot tweet came in response to Clinton earlier Friday implying that Russians were “grooming” the Hawaii congresswoman to give up her Democratic primary bid and run for president as a third-party candidate.

link

Go off, queen.

I had soured on her lately, and her last debate performance was awful, so I didn't intend on bothering with voting in the dem primary, but I may be back on board.

(10-18-2019 03:45 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(10-18-2019 02:34 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(10-18-2019 01:15 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  And I find Hillary to be the most sensible of all the democrats.
Except maybe Tulsi and Yang.

I know you lean democrat, but do you hear what you are saying?

I lean democrat? Really?

I have asked for a democrat ballot in two primaries and voted for Hillary both times--2008 to try to stop Obama and 2016 to stop Bernie. But both were lesser of evils situations, not done because I was FOR Hillary or any other democrat.

Oh yes, I also voted for Leticia vandePutte instead of Dan Patrick for LtGov in 2014, because I had worked with both of them, and one of them is not an idiot.

My apologies.

Tulsi is about to dominate the news cycle, and the dems aren't going to be able to resist calling it a Russian operation.

Let the games (and in-fighting) begin.

(10-18-2019 11:56 AM)bullet Wrote:  https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/...e-election

Tulsi is a Russian asset now!

They need to not let Hillary out. Just put her in a strait jacket.

The question is why are the Democrats so afraid of Gabbard? Its not like she is top 3 or even top 6.

Is it because she isn't goosestepping with the others?

In another thread I was told to delete my account because my disbelief of an actual whistleblower was conspiratorial.

I wonder if HilLIARy would be told to delete her account.

Which is different than her deleting emails, but whatever.

(10-18-2019 03:45 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(10-18-2019 02:34 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(10-18-2019 01:15 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  And I find Hillary to be the most sensible of all the democrats.
Except maybe Tulsi and Yang.

I know you lean democrat, but do you hear what you are saying?

I lean democrat? Really?

I have asked for a democrat ballot in two primaries and voted for Hillary both times--2008 to try to stop Obama and 2016 to stop Bernie. But both were lesser of evils situations, not done because I was FOR Hillary or any other democrat.

Oh yes, I also voted for Leticia vandePutte instead of Dan Patrick for LtGov in 2014, because I had worked with both of them, and one of them is not an idiot.

I hear Dan at times weekday mornings. He was wise to leave ESPN.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

(10-18-2019 02:56 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  Both of the folks running in 2016 now seem to be lacking all their functioning brain cells.

Seriously? He seems to be running circles around the career politicians and getting things done that nobody could get done.

Maybe Hilldawg got into something bad. Maybe you took a hit of it as well with that silly statement.

(10-18-2019 05:52 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(10-18-2019 05:45 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

Ouch, this had to leave a mark on the wicked old witch.....

Quote:Rep. Tulsi Gabbard blasted Hillary Clinton Friday — calling the former first lady “the queen of warmongers” after Clinton implied the Russians were “grooming” the Hawaii congresswoman as an asset.

“Thank you @HillaryClinton,” tweeted Gabbard, who is vying to win the Democratic primary.

“You, the queen of warmongers, embodiment of corruption, and personification of the rot that has sickened the Democratic Party for so long, have finally come out from behind the curtain.”

Gabbard’s red-hot tweet came in response to Clinton earlier Friday implying that Russians were “grooming” the Hawaii congresswoman to give up her Democratic primary bid and run for president as a third-party candidate.

link

Go off, queen.

I had soured on her lately, and her last debate performance was awful, so I didn't intend on bothering with voting in the dem primary, but I may be back on board.

Ive been pondering who I might vote for in the NC primary. I can vote in either one. If she keeps up this type of stuff...I could see pulling the Tulsi trigger just for fun.

(10-18-2019 06:31 PM)Jjoey52 Wrote:  

(10-18-2019 03:45 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(10-18-2019 02:34 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(10-18-2019 01:15 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  And I find Hillary to be the most sensible of all the democrats.
Except maybe Tulsi and Yang.

I know you lean democrat, but do you hear what you are saying?

I lean democrat? Really?
I have asked for a democrat ballot in two primaries and voted for Hillary both times--2008 to try to stop Obama and 2016 to stop Bernie. But both were lesser of evils situations, not done because I was FOR Hillary or any other democrat.
Oh yes, I also voted for Leticia vandePutte instead of Dan Patrick for LtGov in 2014, because I had worked with both of them, and one of them is not an idiot.

I hear Dan at times weekday mornings. He was wise to leave ESPN. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Different Dan, although you may know that. This one was also a sportscaster at one time. Those who worked with him during that period used to differentiate the two as sane Dan and crazy Dan.

(10-18-2019 03:56 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(10-18-2019 03:49 PM)JRsec Wrote:  Hillary is not insane. She is criminally immoral and narcissistic.

And I'd rather have criminally immoral and narcissistic than socialist/communist/collectivist.

I would much rather have the socialist who we know wouldn't be able to get much done except destroy their own party.

(10-18-2019 07:39 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(10-18-2019 06:31 PM)Jjoey52 Wrote:  

(10-18-2019 03:45 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(10-18-2019 02:34 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(10-18-2019 01:15 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  And I find Hillary to be the most sensible of all the democrats.
Except maybe Tulsi and Yang.

I know you lean democrat, but do you hear what you are saying?

I lean democrat? Really?
I have asked for a democrat ballot in two primaries and voted for Hillary both times--2008 to try to stop Obama and 2016 to stop Bernie. But both were lesser of evils situations, not done because I was FOR Hillary or any other democrat.
Oh yes, I also voted for Leticia vandePutte instead of Dan Patrick for LtGov in 2014, because I had worked with both of them, and one of them is not an idiot.

I hear Dan at times weekday mornings. He was wise to leave ESPN. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Different Dan, although you may know that. This one was also a sportscaster at one time. Those who worked with him during that period used to differentiate the two as sane Dan and crazy Dan.

Which was which? FYI, I did know the difference.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

(10-18-2019 08:19 PM)Jjoey52 Wrote:  

(10-18-2019 07:39 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(10-18-2019 06:31 PM)Jjoey52 Wrote:  

(10-18-2019 03:45 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(10-18-2019 02:34 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  I know you lean democrat, but do you hear what you are saying?

I lean democrat? Really?
I have asked for a democrat ballot in two primaries and voted for Hillary both times--2008 to try to stop Obama and 2016 to stop Bernie. But both were lesser of evils situations, not done because I was FOR Hillary or any other democrat.
Oh yes, I also voted for Leticia vandePutte instead of Dan Patrick for LtGov in 2014, because I had worked with both of them, and one of them is not an idiot.

I hear Dan at times weekday mornings. He was wise to leave ESPN. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Different Dan, although you may know that. This one was also a sportscaster at one time. Those who worked with him during that period used to differentiate the two as sane Dan and crazy Dan.

Which was which? FYI, I did know the difference.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

ESPN Dan was sane Dan.

Hillary Clinton the Queen of the Warmongers and Dick Cheney the king of warmongers.

LOL this guy.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

(10-18-2019 04:03 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(10-18-2019 04:00 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(10-18-2019 03:56 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(10-18-2019 03:49 PM)JRsec Wrote:  Hillary is not insane. She is criminally immoral and narcissistic.

And I'd rather have criminally immoral and narcissistic than socialist/communist/collectivist.

No you wouldn't.

If those are my only two choices, I would. Damn straight.

Quote:In that case you are damned if you do and damned if you don't. What the Democrats need next time around is a person like Gabbard. Young people, women, veterans, and some minorities identify with her and yet she isn't polarizing to middle class America.

I'm hearing rumors that Tulsi may run for VP on a libertarian ticket with Justin Amash. They would get my vote. I don't like Trump, but there is no democrat that I would even consider. And Texas won't be close, or if it is, then nationally it won't be close. So I can vote libertarian, hope they get as many votes as they can to legitimize the party, and pray to God that Trump wins.

Why would she settle for a VP spot on that particular ticket? It's not like Amash is much older or has much more experience than she does?

(10-18-2019 09:23 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  

(10-18-2019 04:03 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(10-18-2019 04:00 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(10-18-2019 03:56 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(10-18-2019 03:49 PM)JRsec Wrote:  Hillary is not insane. She is criminally immoral and narcissistic.

And I'd rather have criminally immoral and narcissistic than socialist/communist/collectivist.

No you wouldn't.

If those are my only two choices, I would. Damn straight.

Quote:In that case you are damned if you do and damned if you don't. What the Democrats need next time around is a person like Gabbard. Young people, women, veterans, and some minorities identify with her and yet she isn't polarizing to middle class America.

I'm hearing rumors that Tulsi may run for VP on a libertarian ticket with Justin Amash. They would get my vote. I don't like Trump, but there is no democrat that I would even consider. And Texas won't be close, or if it is, then nationally it won't be close. So I can vote libertarian, hope they get as many votes as they can to legitimize the party, and pray to God that Trump wins.

Why would she settle for a VP spot on that particular ticket? It's not like Amash is much older or has much more experience than she does?

Justin's there first.