(05-15-2019 09:00 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 07:08 PM)sfink16 Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 01:50 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 12:40 PM)sfink16 Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 09:11 AM)The Knight Time Wrote:  You do realize that the ACC has numerous stadiums that in the 40-50K range, yes? Doesn't seem to be a big issue to anyone in the ACC.

Of the 14 stadiums I see 4 including Syracuse's almost 50k. Filling out the remaining 3 are Wake Forest, Boston College, and Duke. None of those schools have been powerhouses while Duke and Syracuse more than hold their own in Basketball to make up for any deficiencies in football. Either way 4 of 14 is not numerous at 28 percent IMO.

More than one in four is a sizable number.

We went from numerous to sizeable. I suppose eventually we'll find the right adjective.

4 of 14 is numerous. More than 1 in 4 is a sizable ratio.

That half of them are under 58k is a pretty strong argument in fact the ACC is the 4th place in P5 by average capacity beating only the PAC.

What's that make the AAC's 2 or 12 converted to 1 or 6, since it's less than sizeable? That's how many AAC stadiums have more than 58k.

BTW, your math is incorrect as only 6 of the 14 teams in the ACC have less then 58k according to this "official" site:

https://www.collegegridirons.com/acc-stadiums/

(05-15-2019 09:24 PM)sfink16 Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 09:00 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 07:08 PM)sfink16 Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 01:50 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 12:40 PM)sfink16 Wrote:  Of the 14 stadiums I see 4 including Syracuse's almost 50k. Filling out the remaining 3 are Wake Forest, Boston College, and Duke. None of those schools have been powerhouses while Duke and Syracuse more than hold their own in Basketball to make up for any deficiencies in football. Either way 4 of 14 is not numerous at 28 percent IMO.

More than one in four is a sizable number.

We went from numerous to sizeable. I suppose eventually we'll find the right adjective.

4 of 14 is numerous. More than 1 in 4 is a sizable ratio.

That half of them are under 58k is a pretty strong argument in fact the ACC is the 4th place in P5 by average capacity beating only the PAC.

What's that make the AAC's 2 or 12 converted to 1 or 6, since it's less than sizeable? That's how many AAC stadiums have more than 58k.

BTW, your math is incorrect as only 6 of the 14 teams in the ACC have less then 58k according to this "official" site:

https://www.collegegridirons.com/acc-stadiums/

Does Miami and Pitt really count? They pay rent to their local NFL teams to use their stadium. You think Pitt needs a 68k stadium...

(05-15-2019 09:24 PM)sfink16 Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 09:00 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 07:08 PM)sfink16 Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 01:50 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 12:40 PM)sfink16 Wrote:  Of the 14 stadiums I see 4 including Syracuse's almost 50k. Filling out the remaining 3 are Wake Forest, Boston College, and Duke. None of those schools have been powerhouses while Duke and Syracuse more than hold their own in Basketball to make up for any deficiencies in football. Either way 4 of 14 is not numerous at 28 percent IMO.

More than one in four is a sizable number.

We went from numerous to sizeable. I suppose eventually we'll find the right adjective.

4 of 14 is numerous. More than 1 in 4 is a sizable ratio.

That half of them are under 58k is a pretty strong argument in fact the ACC is the 4th place in P5 by average capacity beating only the PAC.

What's that make the AAC's 2 or 12 converted to 1 or 6, since it's less than sizeable? That's how many AAC stadiums have more than 58k.

BTW, your math is incorrect as only 6 of the 14 teams in the ACC have less then 58k according to this "official" site:

https://www.collegegridirons.com/acc-stadiums/

ECU fans may know for sure, but only NC State lists the number at 60,000 everyone else list it at 57k+. Including a 247 NC State page and ESPN.

You're also getting off topic. You asserted Louisville stadium size was why they got the invite. Clearly that was not the case.

(05-15-2019 10:54 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  ECU fans may know for sure, but only NC State lists the number at 60,000 everyone else list it at 57k+. Including a 247 NC State page and ESPN.

You're also getting off topic. You asserted Louisville stadium size was why they got the invite. Clearly that was not the case.

OK, back on topic. I contend that Louisville got the invite shorty after expanding and/or announced plans to expand. I haven't seen a denial or proof otherwise.

(05-15-2019 10:37 PM)ArmoredUpKnight Wrote:  Does Miami and Pitt really count? They pay rent to their local NFL teams to use their stadium. You think Pitt needs a 68k stadium...

As does Temple but I digress. Agreed, Pitt does not need that large a stadium. Miami is probably in the same situation but I know very little about them.

Back to the actual topic of this thread:

From yesterday AM:

https://twitter.com/UCFKnights/status/11...92256?s=20

(05-16-2019 11:52 AM)sfink16 Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 10:54 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  ECU fans may know for sure, but only NC State lists the number at 60,000 everyone else list it at 57k+. Including a 247 NC State page and ESPN.

You're also getting off topic. You asserted Louisville stadium size was why they got the invite. Clearly that was not the case.

OK, back on topic. I contend that Louisville got the invite shorty after expanding and/or announced plans to expand. I haven't seen a denial or proof otherwise.

That's not how it works and you know it. You don't prove a null hypothesis. Rather the assertion requires you prove the claim Louisville got in because of their expansion.

(05-16-2019 02:26 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  

(05-16-2019 11:52 AM)sfink16 Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 10:54 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  ECU fans may know for sure, but only NC State lists the number at 60,000 everyone else list it at 57k+. Including a 247 NC State page and ESPN.

You're also getting off topic. You asserted Louisville stadium size was why they got the invite. Clearly that was not the case.

OK, back on topic. I contend that Louisville got the invite shorty after expanding and/or announced plans to expand. I haven't seen a denial or proof otherwise.

That's not how it works and you know it. You don't prove a null hypothesis. Rather the assertion requires you prove the claim Louisville got in because of their expansion.

Louisville is in over UConn and Cincy with similar resumes at the time. The differences is that Louisville got the nod. Now disprove that.

(05-16-2019 10:20 PM)sfink16 Wrote:  

(05-16-2019 02:26 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  

(05-16-2019 11:52 AM)sfink16 Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 10:54 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  ECU fans may know for sure, but only NC State lists the number at 60,000 everyone else list it at 57k+. Including a 247 NC State page and ESPN.

You're also getting off topic. You asserted Louisville stadium size was why they got the invite. Clearly that was not the case.

OK, back on topic. I contend that Louisville got the invite shorty after expanding and/or announced plans to expand. I haven't seen a denial or proof otherwise.

That's not how it works and you know it. You don't prove a null hypothesis. Rather the assertion requires you prove the claim Louisville got in because of their expansion.

Louisville is in over UConn and Cincy with similar resumes at the time. The differences is that Louisville got the nod. Now disprove that.

Lol but it was their stadium size? Prove it. Which is like the third or fourth time I've asked, hell I'll take a speculative sports writer's opinion at the time that it was the difference in stadium sizes.

Louisville has been playing football much longer than UConn and had more recent basketball success than Cincinnati. They also had a deep pocket booster spending crazy on them.

(05-15-2019 10:54 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 09:24 PM)sfink16 Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 09:00 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 07:08 PM)sfink16 Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 01:50 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  More than one in four is a sizable number.

We went from numerous to sizeable. I suppose eventually we'll find the right adjective.

4 of 14 is numerous. More than 1 in 4 is a sizable ratio.

That half of them are under 58k is a pretty strong argument in fact the ACC is the 4th place in P5 by average capacity beating only the PAC.

What's that make the AAC's 2 or 12 converted to 1 or 6, since it's less than sizeable? That's how many AAC stadiums have more than 58k.

BTW, your math is incorrect as only 6 of the 14 teams in the ACC have less then 58k according to this "official" site:

https://www.collegegridirons.com/acc-stadiums/

ECU fans may know for sure, but only NC State lists the number at 60,000 everyone else list it at 57k+. Including a 247 NC State page and ESPN.

You're also getting off topic. You asserted Louisville stadium size was why they got the invite. Clearly that was not the case.

Carter Finley seats 57,500, but you can get more in there.

(05-16-2019 11:06 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  

(05-16-2019 10:20 PM)sfink16 Wrote:  

(05-16-2019 02:26 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  

(05-16-2019 11:52 AM)sfink16 Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 10:54 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  ECU fans may know for sure, but only NC State lists the number at 60,000 everyone else list it at 57k+. Including a 247 NC State page and ESPN.

You're also getting off topic. You asserted Louisville stadium size was why they got the invite. Clearly that was not the case.

OK, back on topic. I contend that Louisville got the invite shorty after expanding and/or announced plans to expand. I haven't seen a denial or proof otherwise.

That's not how it works and you know it. You don't prove a null hypothesis. Rather the assertion requires you prove the claim Louisville got in because of their expansion.

Louisville is in over UConn and Cincy with similar resumes at the time. The differences is that Louisville got the nod. Now disprove that.

Lol but it was their stadium size? Prove it. Which is like the third or fourth time I've asked, hell I'll take a speculative sports writer's opinion at the time that it was the difference in stadium sizes.

Louisville has been playing football much longer than UConn and had more recent basketball success than Cincinnati. They also had a deep pocket booster spending crazy on them.

I did and you responded weakly, a pattern others have noticed about you. I'm not going to continue arguing with an empty suit, who responds with the familiar childish "I know you are but what am I?" type of response.

(05-17-2019 08:07 PM)sfink16 Wrote:  

(05-16-2019 11:06 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  

(05-16-2019 10:20 PM)sfink16 Wrote:  

(05-16-2019 02:26 PM)Foreverandever Wrote:  

(05-16-2019 11:52 AM)sfink16 Wrote:  OK, back on topic. I contend that Louisville got the invite shorty after expanding and/or announced plans to expand. I haven't seen a denial or proof otherwise.

That's not how it works and you know it. You don't prove a null hypothesis. Rather the assertion requires you prove the claim Louisville got in because of their expansion.

Louisville is in over UConn and Cincy with similar resumes at the time. The differences is that Louisville got the nod. Now disprove that.

Lol but it was their stadium size? Prove it. Which is like the third or fourth time I've asked, hell I'll take a speculative sports writer's opinion at the time that it was the difference in stadium sizes.

Louisville has been playing football much longer than UConn and had more recent basketball success than Cincinnati. They also had a deep pocket booster spending crazy on them.

I did and you responded weakly, a pattern others have noticed about you. I'm not going to continue arguing with an empty suit, who responds with the familiar childish "I know you are but what am I?" type of response.

No you stated your opinion. What you think is irrelevant. Even one media mention of Louisville getting in because of stadium size....it really shouldn't be that hard.

You asserted something not supported by evidence. Now you're just spitting out fallacies and more of your opinion, too bad that doesn't help your arguement.

Get your pissing match out of this thread.

(05-18-2019 11:51 AM)The Knight Time Wrote:  Get your pissing match out of this thread.

Good bump.

(05-18-2019 11:51 AM)The Knight Time Wrote:  Get your pissing match out of this thread.

I already stopped and put him on ignore, so all is good.

(05-18-2019 07:25 PM)sfink16 Wrote:  

(05-18-2019 11:51 AM)The Knight Time Wrote:  Get your pissing match out of this thread.

I already stopped and put him on ignore, so all is good.

And another good bump.

Update by CBS's Dennis Dodd:

https://twitter.com/dennisdoddcbs/status...64577?s=20