(12-26-2018 07:59 PM)Mikeyp Wrote:  

(12-26-2018 07:00 AM)Tigers2B1 Wrote:  

(12-25-2018 09:05 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  

(12-25-2018 08:45 PM)Tigers2B1 Wrote:  The article is two and a half years old.

Yes, but I think the points are still valid.

Except in those three additional football seasons Memphis has shown that it is serious about football. It's not just words and it's not just Fuente. 3 years ago that was the biggest concern about Memphis in my opinion.

3 years of Memphis WINNING in football is very serious.

Ahem. FIVE years of winning, 2014-18. 10-3, 9-4, 8-5, 10-3, 8-6.

Now as many winning seasons in a row as we had losing regular seasons before that.

Let's be honest, Cincy, Memphis, Tulane, and the Florida twins are the only teams that the Texas/Oklahoma-less B12 will attempt to pick up. What their media deal will look like at that point will probably be what the AAC accepts soon, 8 million per team.

(12-26-2018 07:13 AM)Chappy Wrote:  

(12-25-2018 08:34 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  Recommends UC, UH, SMU, and BYU to the B12...

http://thesportsquotient.com/ncaa-fb/201...ealignment

This makes sense to me and I believe are the four best adds for sure.

The Big 12 needs to up their academic cred.

Tulane, SMU, Buffalo, Yale.

We always know Yale is desperate for $25 mill a year in TV money