(07-05-2018 06:09 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(07-05-2018 05:24 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(07-05-2018 05:21 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  The problem was that he rolled back some regulations that were needed. Like the clean water issue after the Flint, Michigan chaos. We now have children poison by Mercury that now the tax payers have to pay because of the whole state government were so stupid for letting these things happened. I blamed both Democrats and Republicans for what went down there. We do need some regulations to avoid what happened in Flint. If you get rid of it? how many state elected officials in other states allow these things to happen? Having those regulations in place would save the tax payers' money on the long run.

What regulation did he roll back that would have prevented Flint? And why didn't it prevent Flint the first time? Serious question. You seem to know, so I am asking for my own edification.

He doesn't seem to recall that it was Obama's EPA that discovered problems and blew them off because, "nobody cares about poor people."

Just ask Davey boy for a link to back up his post. It really is funny.

(07-05-2018 06:23 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(07-05-2018 06:09 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(07-05-2018 05:24 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(07-05-2018 05:21 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  The problem was that he rolled back some regulations that were needed. Like the clean water issue after the Flint, Michigan chaos. We now have children poison by Mercury that now the tax payers have to pay because of the whole state government were so stupid for letting these things happened. I blamed both Democrats and Republicans for what went down there. We do need some regulations to avoid what happened in Flint. If you get rid of it? how many state elected officials in other states allow these things to happen? Having those regulations in place would save the tax payers' money on the long run.

What regulation did he roll back that would have prevented Flint? And why didn't it prevent Flint the first time? Serious question. You seem to know, so I am asking for my own edification.

He doesn't seem to recall that it was Obama's EPA that discovered problems and blew them off because, "nobody cares about poor people."

Just ask Davey boy for a link to back up his post. It really is funny.

You are better off asking a pig to take flight than asking for Davist to back up any of his nonsensical ramblings.

Shame he's gone.

(07-05-2018 07:25 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Shame he's gone.

Yes it is. But Pruitt brought this on himself.

The key now is to find someone with similar views but without the drama/baggage.

(07-05-2018 05:26 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  

(07-05-2018 05:06 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(07-05-2018 03:51 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  he only hires the best

no.....that's not how it works

you fire until you find the best......

you would never pass MY first interview.....

...does that mean that you'd still give him ANOTHER chance? Man, you are a kind man Stinky. As soon as I saw him with his man bun I definitely know he wasn't the man...or a real man, period.

Ollie, if there's one thingy I've learned over time, is one doesn't always get it right out of the gate......sometimes a misstep turns into a positive in the plus column....

#sewoats

@changewhenrequired

(07-05-2018 07:25 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Shame he's gone.

While I may have liked the direction he was leading the EPA, his willingness to "perk" himself using taxpayer dollars really meant he couldn't stay.........and he had to know that the MSM would be scouring for any negative dirt they could find - yet he still did just dumb stuff.........

http://fortune.com/2018/07/05/who-is-and...tt-pruitt/

Democrats didn't like the nail? Well here comes the hammer.

(07-06-2018 11:33 AM)Old Blue Wrote:  http://fortune.com/2018/07/05/who-is-and...tt-pruitt/

Democrats didn't like the nail? Well here comes the hammer.

Wow. Out of the frying pan into the fire.

Lol

(Fueled by clean beautiful coal)