(06-05-2018 10:29 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  LOL at Trump. You gotta know he's known about all this shyte since very early-on in his term and is picking the dates to release the information.

Exactly. Thats what makes this so funny. The media wants to argue with a guy that actually has access to every classified document in any US data base. Trump already knows how this movie ends. All he has to do is declassify the docs......and that just about timing the release for the best effect.

(06-05-2018 09:31 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  Someone needs to read the AUP.

Someone else needs to buckle up.

(06-05-2018 10:24 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(06-05-2018 10:20 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(06-05-2018 09:31 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  Someone needs to read the AUP.

Dont worry. Your president and commander in chief has come through when no other links were available:

In before resident alt-leftists claim he doesn't know what he's talking about, despite the fact that he is privy to more info than anyone.

You forgot the "and proven right, time and again" part...

(06-05-2018 10:29 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  LOL at Trump. You gotta know he's known about all this shyte since very early-on in his term and is picking the dates to release the information.

Or close to that, I don't know about picking dates, but it's ALL coming out bit by bit.

Sounds like Fired Andy is asking for immunity, too. Immunity for or from what?

El O El.

When the walls come tumblin' down, when the walls come tumblin, tumblin dooooown...

(06-05-2018 11:31 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  BTW, any other links to the story other than Trump's tweets?

LINKEDIN

(06-06-2018 12:39 PM)green Wrote:  

(06-05-2018 11:31 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  BTW, any other links to the story other than Trump's tweets?

LINKEDIN

I wish someone would provide more context.

(06-06-2018 01:59 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  I wish someone would provide more context.

https://twitter.com/LouDobbs/status/1004146008803201027

SWEET LOU

But but but.......trump banged a porn star and paid her to STFU.


Bwahahahaha

Here's your context. Yeah...it's more idiocy from the Gateway Pundit factory of nonsense for the easily duped.

Quote:Conservatives have pulled several of these messages out of context to paint lurid conspiracies. This text finds that they mentioned “oconus lures,” an apparent reference to spies outside the United States. Page and Strzok were requesting spies, therefore, Gateway Pundit concludes, “the FBI was engaged in Spygate” — i.e., the investigation of Trump’s campaign — “long before they let on.”

Assuming that is what the texts mean, nothing in the messages makes any reference either to the Trump campaign or to Russia. It’s not surprising or scandalous that FBI agents would be using espionage tradecraft. Gateway Pundit seems to have invented the crucial factual element of the conspiracy out of thin air.

It does seem to represent a new step that Trump is citing right-wing conspiracy theorists who operate at a full level further removed from reality than the right-wing conspiracy theorists he customarily cites.

Trump’s Latest FBI Conspiracy Theory Is His Craziest Yet

So what is Strzok's "insurance policy"?

(06-07-2018 03:31 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Here's your context. Yeah...it's more idiocy from the Gateway Pundit factory of nonsense for the easily duped.

Quote:Conservatives have pulled several of these messages out of context to paint lurid conspiracies. This text finds that they mentioned “oconus lures,” an apparent reference to spies outside the United States. Page and Strzok were requesting spies, therefore, Gateway Pundit concludes, “the FBI was engaged in Spygate” — i.e., the investigation of Trump’s campaign — “long before they let on.”

Assuming that is what the texts mean, nothing in the messages makes any reference either to the Trump campaign or to Russia. It’s not surprising or scandalous that FBI agents would be using espionage tradecraft. Gateway Pundit seems to have invented the crucial factual element of the conspiracy out of thin air.

It does seem to represent a new step that Trump is citing right-wing conspiracy theorists who operate at a full level further removed from reality than the right-wing conspiracy theorists he customarily cites.

Trump’s Latest FBI Conspiracy Theory Is His Craziest Yet

You libs are in deep shiiiiiit....

(06-07-2018 03:38 PM)450bench Wrote:  

(06-07-2018 03:31 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Here's your context. Yeah...it's more idiocy from the Gateway Pundit factory of nonsense for the easily duped.

Quote:Conservatives have pulled several of these messages out of context to paint lurid conspiracies. This text finds that they mentioned “oconus lures,” an apparent reference to spies outside the United States. Page and Strzok were requesting spies, therefore, Gateway Pundit concludes, “the FBI was engaged in Spygate” — i.e., the investigation of Trump’s campaign — “long before they let on.”

Assuming that is what the texts mean, nothing in the messages makes any reference either to the Trump campaign or to Russia. It’s not surprising or scandalous that FBI agents would be using espionage tradecraft. Gateway Pundit seems to have invented the crucial factual element of the conspiracy out of thin air.

It does seem to represent a new step that Trump is citing right-wing conspiracy theorists who operate at a full level further removed from reality than the right-wing conspiracy theorists he customarily cites.

Trump’s Latest FBI Conspiracy Theory Is His Craziest Yet

You libs are in deep shiiiiiit....

Thanks your concern, but I fail to see what any of this has to personally do with me or any other of my fellow liberals. If these guys committed crimes, they should be punished just like anyone else regardless of party. Will you say the same if it's the conservatives committing the crimes?

(06-07-2018 03:38 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  So what is Strzok's "insurance policy"?

What was the "plan we discussed in Fired Andy's office".

You know, "the chance they couldn't afford to take?"

(06-07-2018 03:38 PM)450bench Wrote:  

(06-07-2018 03:31 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Here's your context. Yeah...it's more idiocy from the Gateway Pundit factory of nonsense for the easily duped.

Quote:Conservatives have pulled several of these messages out of context to paint lurid conspiracies. This text finds that they mentioned “oconus lures,” an apparent reference to spies outside the United States. Page and Strzok were requesting spies, therefore, Gateway Pundit concludes, “the FBI was engaged in Spygate” — i.e., the investigation of Trump’s campaign — “long before they let on.”

Assuming that is what the texts mean, nothing in the messages makes any reference either to the Trump campaign or to Russia. It’s not surprising or scandalous that FBI agents would be using espionage tradecraft. Gateway Pundit seems to have invented the crucial factual element of the conspiracy out of thin air.

It does seem to represent a new step that Trump is citing right-wing conspiracy theorists who operate at a full level further removed from reality than the right-wing conspiracy theorists he customarily cites.

Trump’s Latest FBI Conspiracy Theory Is His Craziest Yet

You libs are in deep shiiiiiit....

Wait....he discredits Gateway Pundit and uses NY Magazine as a source?



What a maroon.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-magazine/

(06-07-2018 04:00 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(06-07-2018 03:38 PM)450bench Wrote:  

(06-07-2018 03:31 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Here's your context. Yeah...it's more idiocy from the Gateway Pundit factory of nonsense for the easily duped.

Quote:Conservatives have pulled several of these messages out of context to paint lurid conspiracies. This text finds that they mentioned “oconus lures,” an apparent reference to spies outside the United States. Page and Strzok were requesting spies, therefore, Gateway Pundit concludes, “the FBI was engaged in Spygate” — i.e., the investigation of Trump’s campaign — “long before they let on.”

Assuming that is what the texts mean, nothing in the messages makes any reference either to the Trump campaign or to Russia. It’s not surprising or scandalous that FBI agents would be using espionage tradecraft. Gateway Pundit seems to have invented the crucial factual element of the conspiracy out of thin air.

It does seem to represent a new step that Trump is citing right-wing conspiracy theorists who operate at a full level further removed from reality than the right-wing conspiracy theorists he customarily cites.

Trump’s Latest FBI Conspiracy Theory Is His Craziest Yet

You libs are in deep shiiiiiit....

Wait....he discredits Gateway Pundit and uses NY Magazine as a source?



What a maroon.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-magazine/

Yea, got a hearty Guffaw over that.

Not about bias, it's about facts. I see by the fact that not one link has been posted yet on this thread to prove the OP, that you have none.

(06-08-2018 08:37 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Not about bias, it's about facts. I see by the fact that not one link has been posted yet on this thread to prove the OP, that you have none.

The DOJ redacted the word "lures".

The IG unredacted it.

You need to reconcile why the DOJ believed they needed to redact that word, and why the IG didnt. Hint: the redaction had nothing to do with classified info or national security.

(06-08-2018 08:55 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(06-08-2018 08:37 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Not about bias, it's about facts. I see by the fact that not one link has been posted yet on this thread to prove the OP, that you have none.

The DOJ redacted the word "lures".

The IG unredacted it.

You need to reconcile why the DOJ believed they needed to redact that word, and why the IG didnt. Hint: the redaction had nothing to do with classified info or national security.

The inability to ask themselves (RWT as an example) ‘the’ question is what I find most disturbing.

(06-08-2018 08:55 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(06-08-2018 08:37 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Not about bias, it's about facts. I see by the fact that not one link has been posted yet on this thread to prove the OP, that you have none.

The DOJ redacted the word "lures".

The IG unredacted it.

You need to reconcile why the DOJ believed they needed to redact that word, and why the IG didnt. Hint: the redaction had nothing to do with classified info or national security.

Meaningless, you have absolutely NO context for this text message. Translation, you don't have the foggiest idea what operation, if any, they were even referring to.

(06-05-2018 09:15 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  No link yet because its breaking over the airwaves, but one of the Dec 2015 text messages from Lisa Page to PeterStrojk was originally redacted. It said

"Did you get all of our Oconus ******** approved?"

One word was redacted by the DOJ.

Today, the word was un-redacted. Oconus is lingo for counterintelligence. The redacted word was "lures", which is lingo for spies.

They were getting spies for the Trump campaign approved in 2015. The timeline has been completely blown out of the water.

Papadopoulas my ass.

Link please! Per the new AUP, this is required. At least for some of us apparently.