Google's hate machine towards Republicans is on a roll. Of course when it is made public, they remove and apologize.



Google apologizes for labeling NC State Senator as a 'bigot' in search results

Until they start firing some people and make a public announcement that they have fired XX number of people for doing these things, nobody (including their employees doing this) will take them seriously. They don't need to name the fired employees publically.

Google is overrated anyway. Duckduckgo is much better.

I see you still don't understand algorithms and literally think Google has employees manually doing this.

If you want to hate someone, gate the loser liberals that are editing the sites the algorithms pull from, or hate Wikipedia for not having stricter content monitoring.

(06-02-2018 05:48 PM)Niner National Wrote:  I see you still don't understand algorithms and literally think Google has employees manually doing this.

If you want to hate someone, gate the loser liberals that are editing the sites the algorithms pull from, or hate Wikipedia for not having stricter content monitoring.

Nobody things Google employees are actually doing these things. They are allowing it to happen because their algorithms seem to be slanted against conservatives.

Also notice their explanation is the people are essentially 'vandalizing' 3rd party sources. Notice there hasn't been any liberal politicians have their info 'vandalized'. Guess it is only liberals that stoop that low.

Sent from my SM-G900R4 using CSNbbs mobile app

All this apologizing after the fact really Ps'es me off. The Libturds KNOW that the initial propaganda is what matters. They'll say anything to push their bias propaganda and then they'll issue a half S'ed apology. Roseann did a Liberalism by her tweet and then apologizing. Unfortunately, the owner of the network is a Libturd and cancelled her show. In the Libturd world the Libturds KNOW that nothing will happen to them for any disparaging remark or tweet. On the other hand they know that they'll be protected and usually they are.

This is the Nazis and Commies MO. They've (Liberals) are using Saul Alinsky's playbook splendidly.

(06-02-2018 05:48 PM)Niner National Wrote:  I see you still don't understand algorithms and literally think Google has employees manually doing this.

If you want to hate someone, gate the loser liberals that are editing the sites the algorithms pull from, or hate Wikipedia for not having stricter content monitoring.

muh algorithms

I bet you think twitter and facebook's censoring of conservatives and the media's mistakes about President Trump ALL going the same way (against him) is just "algorithms" and a coincidence, as well.

(06-02-2018 02:37 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  Google's hate machine towards Republicans is on a roll. Of course when it is made public, they remove and apologize.



Google apologizes for labeling NC State Senator as a 'bigot' in search results

Is this another instance of google just sniffing up results from wiki?

Can't really blame google for this. Wiki needs to get their crap together and lock down the pages for all political figures so that edits need approval.

(06-02-2018 07:47 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(06-02-2018 02:37 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  Google's hate machine towards Republicans is on a roll. Of course when it is made public, they remove and apologize.



Google apologizes for labeling NC State Senator as a 'bigot' in search results

Is this another instance of google just sniffing up results from wiki?

Can't really blame google for this. Wiki needs to get their crap together and lock down the pages for all political figures so that edits need approval.

It's exactly what it is, but you have people that think Google can and should monitor trillions of data points and if they aren't it's a liberal conspiracy.

(06-02-2018 07:34 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(06-02-2018 05:48 PM)Niner National Wrote:  I see you still don't understand algorithms and literally think Google has employees manually doing this.

If you want to hate someone, gate the loser liberals that are editing the sites the algorithms pull from, or hate Wikipedia for not having stricter content monitoring.

muh algorithms

I bet you think twitter and facebook's censoring of conservatives and the media's mistakes about President Trump ALL going the same way (against him) is just "algorithms" and a coincidence, as well.

it's so simple.....

if I keep people reliant on muh gubberment funding, there will more clicks......

I'd make the donald look like a saint in comparison how I would deal with those cocksucKKKers.....

(06-02-2018 07:47 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  Is this another instance of google just sniffing up results from wiki?

Can't really blame google for this. Wiki needs to get their crap together and lock down the pages for all political figures so that edits need approval.

Google may have to drop Wikipedia. Because Google has become the “Xerox” of search engines, Google will always be left holding the bag when it serves up tainted results.

(06-02-2018 07:47 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(06-02-2018 02:37 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  Google's hate machine towards Republicans is on a roll. Of course when it is made public, they remove and apologize.



Google apologizes for labeling NC State Senator as a 'bigot' in search results

Is this another instance of google just sniffing up results from wiki?

Can't really blame google for this. Wiki needs to get their crap together and lock down the pages for all political figures so that edits need approval.

Or maybe its not "algorithms?" Or maybe its "algorithms" that would sniff out anything similar about a Democrat.

If it was Wikipedia, why hasn't anyone shown this being on Wikipedia or on her webpage? And if it was corrected, why does Google have this particular version?

Google has given us absolutely no reason to believe they are telling the truth about anything.

GOP NC State Senator Fires Back After Being Listed As A ‘Bigot’ In Google Image

I agree with her. Apologies from Google are hollow.

Quote:The North Carolina Republican lawmaker, whose Google results Friday yielded a photo of her with the word “bigot” across the bottom, fired back on Saturday, saying the tech company’s apology “rang a bit hollow.”

State Sen. Trudy Wade released a statement on her website Saturday about the “Google firestorm,” saying that while “I appreciate Google’s belated apology, if I’m being completely honest it rang a bit hollow.”

The controversial image that appeared on the right side of the page, reported by Vice News, showed the word “bigot” written in capital red letters under Wade’s headshot. The image result was later removed, as a search of Wade’s name only provided her website, some brief background information and her party affiliation.

Wade in the statement said that after the controversial photo was discovered, an aide asked Google to remove the photo. “She was told to find and contact the original author of the photo, and the post stayed up,” the lawmaker explained.

Wade claimed that “only after Drudge Report posted it to a national audience and it began to go viral on social media did Google do the right thing.”

Keep reading here

At this point I think some employees are just trolling, a lot like the Comcast employees who would have bills sent to customers title "Raving *****," or "Giant Ass-hole."