DON'T BE ALL GETTIN' UP IN MY BIZNESS

Read here...

Delusional.

"If we win back the House.." might as well be "If the Browns win the Super Bowl.."

The question remains....Impeach him for what? Sorry, they are going to need more than "We don't like him" and after 522 days they still have nothing else......

(05-22-2018 12:41 PM)VA49er Wrote:  The question remains....Impeach him for what? Sorry, they are going to need more than "We don't like him" and after 522 days they still have nothing else......

Yeah...perhaps they should claim he wasn't born here?

Trying to impeach him would be a disaster for the Dems. Even if they managed to get something through the house, it will die a slow death in the Senate.

(05-22-2018 12:41 PM)VA49er Wrote:  The question remains....Impeach him for what? Sorry, they are going to need more than "We don't like him" and after 522 days they still have nothing else......

This.

High crimes and misdemeanors.

And even if they win the House, BIG IF, the hill to climb for the Senate is likely too steep.

So the lunatic left could do a show trial impeachment, but there will never be a conviction.

Being a schit talking brash boor doesn’t rise to the level of high crime or misdemeanor...

But please, by all means dims, run on that platform as well as putting fransicko Nan back in the chair. Y’all may well defy history yet again.

(05-22-2018 12:52 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-22-2018 12:41 PM)VA49er Wrote:  The question remains....Impeach him for what? Sorry, they are going to need more than "We don't like him" and after 522 days they still have nothing else......

Yeah...perhaps they should claim he wasn't born here?

Might as well. It's better than what they've done so far. Still won't lead to anything though...

(05-22-2018 12:52 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-22-2018 12:41 PM)VA49er Wrote:  The question remains....Impeach him for what? Sorry, they are going to need more than "We don't like him" and after 522 days they still have nothing else......

Yeah...perhaps they should claim he wasn't born here?

HERE LIES THE ABYSS

(05-22-2018 12:54 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Trying to impeach him would be a disaster for the Dems. Even if they managed to get something through the house, it will die a slow death in the Senate.

you are correct good sir

(05-22-2018 01:21 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(05-22-2018 12:54 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Trying to impeach him would be a disaster for the Dems. Even if they managed to get something through the house, it will die a slow death in the Senate.

you are correct good sir

Win the house back. Lock Nunes in a dungeon. Reopen the house investigation. Then impeach. That's the plan.

(05-22-2018 01:29 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  

(05-22-2018 01:21 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(05-22-2018 12:54 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Trying to impeach him would be a disaster for the Dems. Even if they managed to get something through the house, it will die a slow death in the Senate.

you are correct good sir

Win the house back. Lock Nunes in a dungeon. Reopen the house investigation. Then impeach. That's the plan.

And that seems to be the only plan. No policy positions, just impeach Trump. Whether there's any evidence or not.

(05-22-2018 01:29 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  

(05-22-2018 01:21 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(05-22-2018 12:54 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Trying to impeach him would be a disaster for the Dems. Even if they managed to get something through the house, it will die a slow death in the Senate.

you are correct good sir

Win the house back. Lock Nunes in a dungeon. Reopen the house investigation. Then impeach. That's the plan.

Do you want the rest of the democrats looking at a possible jail sentence? I guess Democrats are just too hardheaded. Or just ******* stupid because that first investigation might put some there

Impeach in the House...and then what??

Clinton was impeached in the House. Doesn't really mean anything. I think we can all agree it's not going anywhere in the Senate. So what's the point??

This interests and repels me in equal measure, depending on when you catch me.

Democrats are going to hate the rules they put in place now, when as it is inevitable, a Democrat takes back the White House.

I sort of hope it happens.

(05-22-2018 01:21 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(05-22-2018 12:54 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Trying to impeach him would be a disaster for the Dems. Even if they managed to get something through the house, it will die a slow death in the Senate.

you are correct good sir

Here are the reasons... brilliant leadership here....

For "disrespecting and disparaging women" AL Green
For banning transgenders from serving in the military Al Green
For saying NFL athletes should stand for the national anthem Al Green
For being "friends" with Putin Maxine Waters
For being "a clear and present danger" to Americans Tom Steyer
For "putting the health and safety of Americans at risk" Tom Steyer
For being an "inciter" of "hatred" Al Green
For inciting "bigotry" Al Green
For promoting "xenophobia" Al Green
For being an "inciter" of "ethnocentrism" Al Green
For "undermining the federal judiciary" Steve Cohen
For the "Access Hollywood" tape Maxine Waters
For mocking a disabled journalist Maxine Waters
For "threatening the media" John Yarmuth
For "taking money from foreign governments" Tom Steyer
For "dereliction of duty" Ted Lieu
For being incompetent Ezra Klein
For bringing "dishonor" upon the United States Al Green
For being "psychologically deranged" Richard Painter
For not believing in the Constitution Karine Jean-Pierre
For being "racist, sexist, and Islamaphobic" Anushay Hossain
For being "unfit" for office Tom Steyer
For saying some countries are "shitholes" Al Green
For his aides talking to Russians Cory Booker
For urging Sessions to investigate Hillary Chris Hayes
For not being respectful Maxine Waters
For being "the most dangerous president in American history" Tom Perez
For name calling Maxine Waters
A.G. Sessions firing Andrew McCabe Danny Cevallos
For violating the "emoluments clause" Tom Steyer
If he were to fire Robert Mueller Ted Lieu
For being "unwilling to make it clear" Russians can't hack America's "critical infrastructure" John Garamendi
For being "unworthy" and "despicable" Maxine Waters

yep.... there you have it. TDS at its best

(05-22-2018 01:34 PM)solohawks Wrote:  Impeach in the House...and then what??

Clinton was impeached in the House. Doesn't really mean anything. I think we can all agree it's not going anywhere in the Senate. So what's the point??

MAKE POLITICAL HAY

(05-22-2018 01:31 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-22-2018 01:29 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  

(05-22-2018 01:21 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(05-22-2018 12:54 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Trying to impeach him would be a disaster for the Dems. Even if they managed to get something through the house, it will die a slow death in the Senate.

you are correct good sir

Win the house back. Lock Nunes in a dungeon. Reopen the house investigation. Then impeach. That's the plan.

And that seems to be the only plan. No policy positions, just impeach Trump. Whether there's any evidence or not.

We're just playing the president's game. Do what it takes to fire up the base. He'll, make it up as you go along if you have to.

(05-22-2018 01:38 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  

(05-22-2018 01:31 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-22-2018 01:29 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  

(05-22-2018 01:21 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(05-22-2018 12:54 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Trying to impeach him would be a disaster for the Dems. Even if they managed to get something through the house, it will die a slow death in the Senate.

you are correct good sir

Win the house back. Lock Nunes in a dungeon. Reopen the house investigation. Then impeach. That's the plan.

And that seems to be the only plan. No policy positions, just impeach Trump. Whether there's any evidence or not.

We're just playing the president's game. Do what it takes to fire up the base. He'll, make it up as you go along if you have to.

Today's politics: never explain, never apologize. Walk in like you own the place, do your thing, and walk out again. That’s how you get to be the boss.

Seriously... run on that platform, Dems. Lmao.