(01-20-2018 06:12 AM)TribeNiner Wrote: (01-19-2018 02:52 PM)Ourland Wrote: This is why Rice would rather be affiliated with other like-minded institutions. Public and private schools don't see eye-to-eye. Our cultures are very different. Private schools mostly try their best to recruit players who are good students and who stay out of trouble, while public schools take anyone who can catch a ball.
Well that's just not true.
UVA
Berkeley
William & Mary
UCLA
Michigan
Wisconsin
The service academies
Etc.
There are plenty of phenomenal public schools that value academics.
Well, yes and no. It depends a lot on on the football coach and the president of the institution. Rice is one of the smallest schools, and so each player taken is a significant percentage of the overall class. We cannot afford to have that significant percentage used on a person with marginal academic skills or marginal moral fiber. So I believe that places like UCLA and Berkeley are less strict about their requirements - for football players - than Rice.
I exempt the service academies from that, as I have the highest respect for their students. I also think that as size gets smaller, the requirements become more Ricelike, so maybe W&M also could also be exempted.
something like 12% of our student body is on athletic scholarship (all sports) - we need to maintain the overall quality of the school. Twenty bad eggs out of 2500 makes a bigger splash than twenty out of 25,000.
The way we usually put this is that when some paper publishes a top 100 list of recruits, there are only about 40 we can actually offer, while Texas or A&M, good academic schools but giants, can offer the whole list if they want.
Interestingly, your list includes one of my finalists when I chose Rice a half century back.