Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
What about BYU...
Author Message
TU4ever Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,941
Joined: Feb 2017
Reputation: 169
I Root For: Tulsa
Location:
Post: #41
RE: What about BYU...
(01-02-2018 08:09 PM)Tigersmoke4 Wrote:  
(01-02-2018 04:03 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  
(01-02-2018 03:30 PM)AusTxPony Wrote:  Yes to BYU (West) and Army (East). Both can schedule OOC P6 with ease. Both have good fan appeal. Both have good academic reputations. BYU on field performance will improve. Both would accept Football Only. Need to leave the MWC with some teams to knock each other off. Like 14 teams, 6 intra-division and 2 inter-division, less likely rematch for Champ game.

Army Navy have to be in the same division.

Add army to schedule some east games in an alliance and do the same for BYU to schedule west schools. Keep travel down, add quality games, more access and share bowls and tv money.

Every time I hear this ridiculous idea it makes me cringe. Anybody else that thinks a scheduling alliance with anyone other than Notre Dame or Texas makes any frickin sense call me because I have some lovely bridges for sale 05-nono07-coffee3


Lol, byu makes roughly what we do individually. Has games in nuetral sights that sell out and schedules p6 games easily. Army pretty much already does what I suggested and makes crazy money off navy army. Both come with their own bowl tie ins. Both bring a national following and historic relevance. This isn't New Mexico st and UMass.

Side note, Texas is never going independent, they aren't Notre Dame and no one will pay them a billion for 1/3 of a state even one the size of Texas. AnM closed that door when they jumped to the sec and broke up the big Xii Texas monopoly and the lhn turned out craptastic.
01-03-2018 11:22 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
The Knight Time Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,286
Joined: Sep 2003
Reputation: 93
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #42
RE: What about BYU...
(01-03-2018 11:22 AM)TU4ever Wrote:  
(01-02-2018 08:09 PM)Tigersmoke4 Wrote:  
(01-02-2018 04:03 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  
(01-02-2018 03:30 PM)AusTxPony Wrote:  Yes to BYU (West) and Army (East). Both can schedule OOC P6 with ease. Both have good fan appeal. Both have good academic reputations. BYU on field performance will improve. Both would accept Football Only. Need to leave the MWC with some teams to knock each other off. Like 14 teams, 6 intra-division and 2 inter-division, less likely rematch for Champ game.

Army Navy have to be in the same division.

Add army to schedule some east games in an alliance and do the same for BYU to schedule west schools. Keep travel down, add quality games, more access and share bowls and tv money.

Every time I hear this ridiculous idea it makes me cringe. Anybody else that thinks a scheduling alliance with anyone other than Notre Dame or Texas makes any frickin sense call me because I have some lovely bridges for sale 05-nono07-coffee3


Lol, byu makes roughly what we do individually. Has games in nuetral sights that sell out and schedules p6 games easily. Army pretty much already does what I suggested and makes crazy money off navy army. Both come with their own bowl tie ins. Both bring a national following and historic relevance. This isn't New Mexico st and UMass.

Side note, Texas is never going independent, they aren't Notre Dame and no one will pay them a billion for 1/3 of a state even one the size of Texas. AnM closed that door when they jumped to the sec and broke up the big Xii Texas monopoly and the lhn turned out craptastic.

Funny you mention UMass, since BYU lost to them.....

07-coffee3
01-03-2018 11:24 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Dawgxas Offline
#FreeDeb025

Posts: 6,874
Joined: Jan 2015
I Root For: Louisiana Tech
Location:
Post: #43
RE: What about BYU...
Sorry not a chance in hades.
01-03-2018 11:28 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TU4ever Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,941
Joined: Feb 2017
Reputation: 169
I Root For: Tulsa
Location:
Post: #44
RE: What about BYU...
(01-03-2018 11:24 AM)The Knight Time Wrote:  
(01-03-2018 11:22 AM)TU4ever Wrote:  
(01-02-2018 08:09 PM)Tigersmoke4 Wrote:  
(01-02-2018 04:03 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  
(01-02-2018 03:30 PM)AusTxPony Wrote:  Yes to BYU (West) and Army (East). Both can schedule OOC P6 with ease. Both have good fan appeal. Both have good academic reputations. BYU on field performance will improve. Both would accept Football Only. Need to leave the MWC with some teams to knock each other off. Like 14 teams, 6 intra-division and 2 inter-division, less likely rematch for Champ game.

Army Navy have to be in the same division.

Add army to schedule some east games in an alliance and do the same for BYU to schedule west schools. Keep travel down, add quality games, more access and share bowls and tv money.

Every time I hear this ridiculous idea it makes me cringe. Anybody else that thinks a scheduling alliance with anyone other than Notre Dame or Texas makes any frickin sense call me because I have some lovely bridges for sale 05-nono07-coffee3


Lol, byu makes roughly what we do individually. Has games in nuetral sights that sell out and schedules p6 games easily. Army pretty much already does what I suggested and makes crazy money off navy army. Both come with their own bowl tie ins. Both bring a national following and historic relevance. This isn't New Mexico st and UMass.

Side note, Texas is never going independent, they aren't Notre Dame and no one will pay them a billion for 1/3 of a state even one the size of Texas. AnM closed that door when they jumped to the sec and broke up the big Xii Texas monopoly and the lhn turned out craptastic.

Funny you mention UMass, since BYU lost to them.....

07-coffee3

A million people watched it and they had 30,000+ fans who showed up.The program BYU has been successful in every decade and incarnation of college football.
01-03-2018 11:29 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TU4ever Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,941
Joined: Feb 2017
Reputation: 169
I Root For: Tulsa
Location:
Post: #45
RE: What about BYU...
(01-03-2018 11:28 AM)Dawgxas Wrote:  Sorry not a chance in hades.

Oh look the la tech fan showed up who wants to crank the music box while we watch the little g4 dance?
01-03-2018 11:32 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
FlyingTiger2016 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,428
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 60
I Root For: Memphis/GaTech
Location:
Post: #46
RE: What about BYU...
(01-03-2018 10:35 AM)hawghiggs Wrote:  If the AAC was going to expand. Then Georgia state might be a program to give a look at. They remind me of UCF and USF in a lot of ways. Two decades ago nobody gave them any notice. But look at both of those programs now. GSU would be a good investment for the AAC.

I like schools that are an easy drive from Memphis.
01-03-2018 12:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BullsFanInTX Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,485
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 338
I Root For: USF
Location:
Post: #47
RE: What about BYU...
(01-03-2018 10:35 AM)hawghiggs Wrote:  If the AAC was going to expand. Then Georgia state might be a program to give a look at. They remind me of UCF and USF in a lot of ways. Two decades ago nobody gave them any notice. But look at both of those programs now. GSU would be a good investment for the AAC.

I somewhat agree about GA St. I like the fact that they have their own stadium (refurbished Turner Field), but they need a little more time to mature. I have an eye on Georgia State though.
01-03-2018 12:22 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
hawghiggs Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,792
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 124
I Root For: Arkansas
Location:
Post: #48
RE: What about BYU...
(01-03-2018 12:22 PM)BullsFanInTX Wrote:  
(01-03-2018 10:35 AM)hawghiggs Wrote:  If the AAC was going to expand. Then Georgia state might be a program to give a look at. They remind me of UCF and USF in a lot of ways. Two decades ago nobody gave them any notice. But look at both of those programs now. GSU would be a good investment for the AAC.

I somewhat agree about GA St. I like the fact that they have their own stadium (refurbished Turner Field), but they need a little more time to mature. I have an eye on Georgia State though.

That might be true about the maturity of the program. But who better than the AAC to help them? If given the benefit of being in the AAC. Then GSU could quickly turn into a solid program.
01-03-2018 01:36 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TrojanCampaign Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,705
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 170
I Root For: USC, AAMU,
Location: Huntsville
Post: #49
RE: What about BYU...
(01-03-2018 01:36 PM)hawghiggs Wrote:  
(01-03-2018 12:22 PM)BullsFanInTX Wrote:  
(01-03-2018 10:35 AM)hawghiggs Wrote:  If the AAC was going to expand. Then Georgia state might be a program to give a look at. They remind me of UCF and USF in a lot of ways. Two decades ago nobody gave them any notice. But look at both of those programs now. GSU would be a good investment for the AAC.

I somewhat agree about GA St. I like the fact that they have their own stadium (refurbished Turner Field), but they need a little more time to mature. I have an eye on Georgia State though.

That might be true about the maturity of the program. But who better than the AAC to help them? If given the benefit of being in the AAC. Then GSU could quickly turn into a solid program.

I think GSU would actually be a good fit for the AAC also. Atlanta should be able to support 3 good teams. Especially considering Tech is not really a powerhouse program...
01-03-2018 04:01 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
billybobby777 Offline
The REAL BillyBobby
*

Posts: 11,898
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 502
I Root For: ECU, Army
Location: Houston dont sleepon
Post: #50
RE: What about BYU...
(01-02-2018 07:44 PM)Tigersmoke4 Wrote:  
(01-02-2018 12:08 PM)YNot Wrote:  BYU administration will right the ship. The Grimes OC hire is a step in the right direction.

There is still huge fan support. BYU still had 51K in the seats with a 3-8 record for a game against 3-7 UMass in late November weather.

I think the 2017 season has humbled BYU a little. If schedules could be worked out, I think a move for the 2020 season would make sense for everyone.

What!!?? No mention of some Notre Dame type of alliance to share our bowls while allowing Byu to remain indy05-stirthepot05-stirthepot. I kid,but I happen to believe that in the end we will end up with 2 of Byu, Boise, SDSU with Gonzaga as a bball bonus. My cousins ex in law who works for NBC told me this so keep it a secret COGS

Hahahahaha
01-03-2018 07:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
thespiritof1976 Offline
Ancient Alien Theorist
*

Posts: 5,067
Joined: Oct 2017
Reputation: 518
I Root For: Zeti Reticuli
Location:
Post: #51
RE: What about BYU...
01-04-2018 12:45 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.