(12-13-2017 03:17 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(12-13-2017 01:34 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  Willing to listen is not collusion.

If it isn't collusion then what is it?

Umm, how about willingness to listen? That's what I'd call it.

(12-13-2017 03:23 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(12-13-2017 03:17 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(12-13-2017 01:34 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  Willing to listen is not collusion.

If it isn't collusion then what is it?

Umm, how about willingness to listen? That's what I'd call it.

Perhaps they should have gone to the FBI about it instead. Isn't that what you would have done?

I mean it's not collusion but it's highly unamerican at the very least.

The Russians are attempting to interfere with the election and you agree to meet with them to see what they got?

(12-13-2017 03:55 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(12-13-2017 03:23 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(12-13-2017 03:17 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(12-13-2017 01:34 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  Willing to listen is not collusion.

If it isn't collusion then what is it?

Umm, how about willingness to listen? That's what I'd call it.

Perhaps they should have gone to the FBI about it instead. Isn't that what you would have done?
I mean it's not collusion but it's highly unamerican at the very least.
The Russians are attempting to interfere with the election and you agree to meet with them to see what they got?

How do I know to take it to the FBI until I meet with them and find out what they've got? And how do I know it's "the Russians"?

(12-12-2017 05:40 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  Ted "Leave the Blonde in the Pond" Kennedy was the ultimate sleaze bag senator. The left's total unwillingness to call him out on any of his evils renders anything that they say about any republican to be blatant hypocrisy.

Hey, but that was a long time ago...oh, wait.

It only matters when it's a Republican.

(12-12-2017 12:32 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 12:30 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  I saw Russians rigging voting machines, true story.

Care to comment on what Tillerson said?

I couldn't care less if Russia tried to rig the election. I expect they do it every time. Same with us to countless other countries. Maybe it's time to grow up and understand it's a big bad world out there. I only care if Trump was involved.

Sent from my XT1080 using CSNbbs mobile app

(12-12-2017 01:55 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 01:52 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 01:48 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 01:34 PM)Kronke Wrote:  First, the Russians "hacked" the election. (debunked as fake news)

Then, President Trump "colluded with the Russians". (debunked as fake news)

Now, Russia "interfered" by buying $100k in nonsense cuckbook ads that no one saw. Go ahead, hang your hat there if it makes you feel better.

#fitfail

Wait a minute. You still don't think the Russians had anything to do with the election?

Why then do you think so many members of the Trump administration met with the Russians?

They met with "the Russians" just like they met with the Chinese, the British, the whoevers -- within the purview of their job and on the up and up.

See the retracted fake news story on Jeff Sessions for reference. Or the retracted fake news story on General Flynn. Or the retracted fake news story on Don Jr. Etc. Etc. Etc.

The difference between those countries and Russia is that those countries aren't being accused of attempting to influence our election.

Do you understand why their meetings with Russia would draw more attention?

She lost to a political neophyte who had never run for any office in his entire life. If they were to admit that simple truth, Democrat supporters would be searching for the nearest cliff to throw themselves off of. They have no choice but to push this stupid Russia narrative.

Sent from my XT1080 using CSNbbs mobile app

(12-13-2017 04:03 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(12-13-2017 03:55 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(12-13-2017 03:23 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(12-13-2017 03:17 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(12-13-2017 01:34 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  Willing to listen is not collusion.

If it isn't collusion then what is it?

Umm, how about willingness to listen? That's what I'd call it.

Perhaps they should have gone to the FBI about it instead. Isn't that what you would have done?
I mean it's not collusion but it's highly unamerican at the very least.
The Russians are attempting to interfere with the election and you agree to meet with them to see what they got?

How do I know to take it to the FBI until I meet with them and find out what they've got? And how do I know it's "the Russians"?

So you wouldn't go to the FBI and say hey, theres these guys claiming to be Russians who want to meet with me say they got dirt on Hillary? Really?

Sorry but that just sounds so unamerican to me.