(03-14-2018 03:41 PM)CliftonAve Wrote:  

(03-14-2018 03:37 PM)Wheatshock Wrote:  CUSA has a new TV deal. No info on $ in the announcement though.

http://www.conferenceusa.com/news/2018/3..._2018.aspx

Wren Baker, North Texas' AD, tweeted this represents more significantly more revenue and broader distribution for the conference.

If it does they why not list the increase?

(01-30-2018 10:51 PM)BigHouston Wrote:  

(01-30-2018 07:30 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  

(01-30-2018 01:50 AM)shockwave Wrote:  

(01-29-2018 09:54 AM)billybobby777 Wrote:  

(01-29-2018 03:05 AM)shockwave Wrote:  BYU, Army, Boise State and Air Force are the only financially beneficial nationall football brand names with a national fan base not in the P5. Add Gonzaga and St. Mary's to offset any football only adds. Add all six and you are instant P5, perception wise.

Wow. This is your very first post?^

...and?

And you got banned

That has to be quickest banned I've seen

hello, goodbye

(03-14-2018 03:37 PM)Wheatshock Wrote:  CUSA has a new TV deal. No info on $ in the announcement though.

http://www.conferenceusa.com/news/2018/3..._2018.aspx

The Virginia Pilot says the deal increases CUSA per team earnings to $400K per year.

(03-14-2018 07:56 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(03-14-2018 03:37 PM)Wheatshock Wrote:  CUSA has a new TV deal. No info on $ in the announcement though.

http://www.conferenceusa.com/news/2018/3..._2018.aspx

The Virginia Pilot says the deal increases CUSA per team earnings to $400K per year.

Double the money for them. Even the lower tiers are getting increases.

(01-31-2018 08:15 AM)Pony94 Wrote:  Nope

Isn't bumping up old threads what got me on your bad side Pony? Until you got all mad at me for that you were my favorite mod bro!

(03-14-2018 10:45 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  

(01-31-2018 08:15 AM)Pony94 Wrote:  Nope

Isn't bumping up old threads what got me on your bad side Pony? Until you got all mad at me for that you were my favorite mod bro!

You went Quo on us and replied to every thread on the board. Luckily that’s long in the past

(03-14-2018 10:47 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  

(03-14-2018 10:45 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  

(01-31-2018 08:15 AM)Pony94 Wrote:  Nope

Isn't bumping up old threads what got me on your bad side Pony? Until you got all mad at me for that you were my favorite mod bro!

You went Quo on us and replied to every thread on the board. Luckily that’s long in the past

I went a little over board I know. I admit that. I was trying to prove a point.--I can't remember exactly which point but I'm saying I thought I had a good reason for it

It sounds like 6 million is a number. He talks about multiples of the existing contract here at the 9 minute mark. https://www.thedailystampede.com/2018/3/...ike-aresco If we make multiples, one multiple is 4 million where "multiples" make 6 million.

(04-01-2018 05:26 PM)rosewater Wrote:  It sounds like 6 million is a number. He talks about multiples of the existing contract here at the 9 minute mark. https://www.thedailystampede.com/2018/3/...ike-aresco If we make multiples, one multiple is 4 million where "multiples" make 6 million.

$32 million is a good multiple. Any penny less and i'm deeply offended.

(04-01-2018 07:31 PM)KNIGHTTIME Wrote:  

(04-01-2018 05:26 PM)rosewater Wrote:  It sounds like 6 million is a number. He talks about multiples of the existing contract here at the 9 minute mark. https://www.thedailystampede.com/2018/3/...ike-aresco If we make multiples, one multiple is 4 million where "multiples" make 6 million.

$32 million is a good multiple. Any penny less and i'm deeply offended.

Yes, but my point is he used "multiples" in the plural. That would make 6 million or more what we are shooting for.