slhNavy91
Heisman
Posts: 7,902
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation: 1633
I Root For: Navy
Location:
|
RE: OT: Ga State vs. App State
(11-26-2017 06:21 PM)fanhood Wrote: (11-26-2017 05:57 PM)slhNavy91 Wrote: (11-26-2017 12:23 PM)fanhood Wrote: (11-26-2017 12:22 PM)KNIGHTTIME Wrote: (11-26-2017 12:18 PM)fanhood Wrote: And SDSU lead all G5 conference teams in attendance, with four games of over 40k, attendance. What is your point?
My point is, teams in the G5, with little to play for do not draw well. Just look at average teams in the AAC like SMU and Temple.
Its a P5 world, and you are just living in it.
Outside of sdsu and Boise the entire mwc is hot garage. The aac has more drawing power especially with our P6 status
Maybe, but when SMU, Cinci, and Temple draw flies, it is hard to throw stones, glass houses and all.
Once again, a G4 fan whistling past the graveyard with that old refrain "we're all the same"
I look forward to seeing 2017 figures from the NCAA, but from 2016, the per-team average attendance of AAC's 12 teams: 31,549.5
mwc: 24,296.5
30% greater. That's not "we're all the same" - that's an A student vs a C student.
fanhood grabs SMU numbers. In 2016, SMU averaged 23,712 - 10th in the AAC but right at the mwc median. AAC's worst - would slide in ahead of four mwc teams.
It's a lot like the on field performance metric of composite rankings: only a couple mwc teams would be in the top HALF of the AAC, and the lowest AAC team can still lord it over the mwc.
I never do this, because I generally believe a ticket sold is a ticket sold. However, for you to use SMU as an example is unreal. SMU announced 14,209 for the game against Tulane. I could not find a photo of the stands, but the attendance was also far less than that. Capacity is only 32k, and it looked to be 25% full at most.
If you are going to use an example, SMU does not do you justice. Come back with another one.
ECU has great attendance, they are just being hurt by a horrible coaching hire, and bad decisions by the administration. Navy has good attendance all things considered. UCF has always done well in this category when playing well. Even Cinci does quite well early in the year. But the rest of the programs struggle, and they struggle mightily. Again, its not your fault. Life in the G5.
Finally, at the end of the day. I don't really care. My program outdraws every program here. True, it has taken 8 straight bowl games, and three double digit win seasons. We will drop significantly if we start losing at any point.
fanhood, YOU brought SMU into this discussion.
AND when you did bring up the AAC's 10th-best attendance team, you said "life in the G5s," which was why I got on my P6 vs G4 soapbox. You tried to use our #10 to equate the AAC with all the G4s - it's a fallacy like pulling Nevada's 18,501 and saying the mwc is just like FCS programs. And yet, YOUR cherry-picked example of AAC poor attendance still draws better than half the mwc.
Great job for the SDSU fanbase on attendance this season - which makes it one of maybe one or two mwc schools that would be in the top half of the AAC. It's a lot like on field performance (measured by composite rankings), or like viewership: one or two schools' attendance, or one or two games' viewers, crack the top half of AAC's measured performance.
Year after year, top to bottom, AAC is head and shoulders above the G4s on and off the field. Our best are better, with the occasional Boise, SDSU, or WMU last year being the exception that proves the rule; our worst are still ahead of multiple G4s on the field or in attendance, viewers, expenditures, etc. We're not all the same. I hope that gets validated with our next media deal and then strategically when we are on the inside looking out after the next great shakeup circa 2025.
None of this attempts to repudiate that SDSU had very good attendance this year. SDSU also had a great OOC win over Stanford and another quality win over Arizona State. I look forward to wearing my wager-won SDSU t-shirt after Navy beats Army. Congrats.
|
|