(11-19-2017 01:08 AM)rtaylor Wrote:  

(11-18-2017 11:23 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  P6 baby

Clown baby.

IIRC, we are 4-11 vs the P5 this year, and three of those wins are against teams with losing records, two of them, Maryland and Illinois, are disasters, and UCLA is 5-6, still not bowl eligible. We've done nothing vs the P5 this year, it's just the way it is.

(11-19-2017 08:34 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(11-19-2017 01:08 AM)rtaylor Wrote:  

(11-18-2017 11:23 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  P6 baby

Clown baby.

IIRC, we are 4-11 vs the P5 this year, and three of those wins are against teams with losing records, two of them, Maryland and Illinois, are disasters, and UCLA is 5-6, still not bowl eligible. We've done nothing vs the P5 this year, it's just the way it is.

Maybe our record would be better if the top teams put together competent OOC P6 schedules. Our bottom/rebuilding schools were the ones that scheduled the majority of P6 games (9 out of the 15).

(11-19-2017 09:03 AM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(11-19-2017 08:34 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(11-19-2017 01:08 AM)rtaylor Wrote:  

(11-18-2017 11:23 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  P6 baby

Clown baby.

IIRC, we are 4-11 vs the P5 this year, and three of those wins are against teams with losing records, two of them, Maryland and Illinois, are disasters, and UCLA is 5-6, still not bowl eligible. We've done nothing vs the P5 this year, it's just the way it is.

Maybe our record would be better if the top teams put together competent OOC P6 schedules. Our bottom/rebuilding schools were the ones that scheduled the majority of P6 games (9 out of the 15).

You never know with scheduling. When Ole Miss agreed to schedule Memphis we were a train wreck. By time the games came around Fuente and Lynch were there and it cost them a huge loss in Memphis.

(11-19-2017 09:03 AM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(11-19-2017 08:34 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(11-19-2017 01:08 AM)rtaylor Wrote:  

(11-18-2017 11:23 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  P6 baby

Clown baby.

IIRC, we are 4-11 vs the P5 this year, and three of those wins are against teams with losing records, two of them, Maryland and Illinois, are disasters, and UCLA is 5-6, still not bowl eligible. We've done nothing vs the P5 this year, it's just the way it is.

Maybe our record would be better if the top teams put together competent OOC P6 schedules. Our bottom/rebuilding schools were the ones that scheduled the majority of P6 games (9 out of the 15).

Great point. UCF, USF, Memphis, Navy, Houston, SMU are 4-3 against P5; the rest are 0-9, with kudos to UConn scheduling 3 of these games. We all should have a minimum of 2 P5 OOC games.

(11-19-2017 09:03 AM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(11-19-2017 08:34 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(11-19-2017 01:08 AM)rtaylor Wrote:  

(11-18-2017 11:23 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  P6 baby

Clown baby.

IIRC, we are 4-11 vs the P5 this year, and three of those wins are against teams with losing records, two of them, Maryland and Illinois, are disasters, and UCLA is 5-6, still not bowl eligible. We've done nothing vs the P5 this year, it's just the way it is.

Maybe our record would be better if the top teams put together competent OOC P6 schedules. Our bottom/rebuilding schools were the ones that scheduled the majority of P6 games (9 out of the 15).

FWIW, the Bulls played two P5 last year, and we will play two P5 in 2018 and 2019 as well. That's our norm, this was just one of those years.

My daughter was at the game she said that UConn won the first quarter then BC out muscled them. Some a****** fireman gave her a hard time so she said she's a Boston girl but she goes to Uconn and loves em and hates BC because they rejected her, because she's not Irish Catholic

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app