Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Gun Laws Work
Author Message
miko33 Offline
Defender of Honesty and Integrity
*

Posts: 13,117
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 848
I Root For: Alma Mater
Location:
Post: #1
Gun Laws Work
Apologies if this has been posted before, but I stumbled across this just now. Evidently a reporter for the Chicago Sun Times tried to buy an AR-15 to demonstrate how easy it is for someone to buy an "assault" rifle. Here is how it went down...

Gun Laws in Action?

Quote:Neil Steinberg, a journalist at the Chicago Sun-Times, tried to buy a semi-automatic rifle at Maxon Shooter’s Supplies in Des Plaines, Illinois, following the Orlando nightclub massacre, to prove how easy it was to obtain an “assault rifle.”

To make the purchase, Steinberg needed a Firearm’s Owners’ Identification Card (FOID), which he had, and he needed to fill out the background check forms that are required to buy a firearm.

During the 24-hour waiting period, the gun store informed Steinberg that he was not legally eligible to purchase the gun because he failed his background check due to “an admitted history of alcohol abuse, and a charge for domestic battery involving his wife.”

Looks like the laws protected us from a potentially dangerous individual. They work when you try to legally purchase a firearm.
11-17-2017 06:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


dfarr Offline
Murse Practitioner
*

Posts: 9,402
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation: 166
I Root For: UAB
Location:

BlazerTalk AwardBlazerTalk Award
Post: #2
RE: Gun Laws Work
(11-17-2017 06:48 PM)miko33 Wrote:  Apologies if this has been posted before, but I stumbled across this just now. Evidently a reporter for the Chicago Sun Times tried to buy an AR-15 to demonstrate how easy it is for someone to buy an "assault" rifle. Here is how it went down...

Gun Laws in Action?

Quote:Neil Steinberg, a journalist at the Chicago Sun-Times, tried to buy a semi-automatic rifle at Maxon Shooter’s Supplies in Des Plaines, Illinois, following the Orlando nightclub massacre, to prove how easy it was to obtain an “assault rifle.”

To make the purchase, Steinberg needed a Firearm’s Owners’ Identification Card (FOID), which he had, and he needed to fill out the background check forms that are required to buy a firearm.

During the 24-hour waiting period, the gun store informed Steinberg that he was not legally eligible to purchase the gun because he failed his background check due to “an admitted history of alcohol abuse, and a charge for domestic battery involving his wife.”

Looks like the laws protected us from a potentially dangerous individual. They work when you try to legally purchase a firearm.

I had heard about this a while ago. People who complain about how easy it is to buy a gun have never actually tried to buy one. Sure, for folks like me who have no criminal record it is easy, as it should be. The last gun I bought in June took me about 5 minutes to buy, but I have my CC permit which makes it even easier to buy.
11-17-2017 11:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UCF08 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 12,262
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 211
I Root For: UCF
Location:
Post: #3
RE: Gun Laws Work
(11-17-2017 11:11 PM)dfarr Wrote:  
(11-17-2017 06:48 PM)miko33 Wrote:  Apologies if this has been posted before, but I stumbled across this just now. Evidently a reporter for the Chicago Sun Times tried to buy an AR-15 to demonstrate how easy it is for someone to buy an "assault" rifle. Here is how it went down...

Gun Laws in Action?

Quote:Neil Steinberg, a journalist at the Chicago Sun-Times, tried to buy a semi-automatic rifle at Maxon Shooter’s Supplies in Des Plaines, Illinois, following the Orlando nightclub massacre, to prove how easy it was to obtain an “assault rifle.”

To make the purchase, Steinberg needed a Firearm’s Owners’ Identification Card (FOID), which he had, and he needed to fill out the background check forms that are required to buy a firearm.

During the 24-hour waiting period, the gun store informed Steinberg that he was not legally eligible to purchase the gun because he failed his background check due to “an admitted history of alcohol abuse, and a charge for domestic battery involving his wife.”

Looks like the laws protected us from a potentially dangerous individual. They work when you try to legally purchase a firearm.

I had heard about this a while ago. People who complain about how easy it is to buy a gun have never actually tried to buy one. Sure, for folks like me who have no criminal record it is easy, as it should be. The last gun I bought in June took me about 5 minutes to buy, but I have my CC permit which makes it even easier to buy.

What about personal sales? Do they have the same standard? Genuine question.
11-18-2017 08:08 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Crebman Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 9,407
Joined: Apr 2007
Reputation: 552
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #4
RE: Gun Laws Work
(11-18-2017 08:08 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-17-2017 11:11 PM)dfarr Wrote:  
(11-17-2017 06:48 PM)miko33 Wrote:  Apologies if this has been posted before, but I stumbled across this just now. Evidently a reporter for the Chicago Sun Times tried to buy an AR-15 to demonstrate how easy it is for someone to buy an "assault" rifle. Here is how it went down...

Gun Laws in Action?

Quote:Neil Steinberg, a journalist at the Chicago Sun-Times, tried to buy a semi-automatic rifle at Maxon Shooter’s Supplies in Des Plaines, Illinois, following the Orlando nightclub massacre, to prove how easy it was to obtain an “assault rifle.”

To make the purchase, Steinberg needed a Firearm’s Owners’ Identification Card (FOID), which he had, and he needed to fill out the background check forms that are required to buy a firearm.

During the 24-hour waiting period, the gun store informed Steinberg that he was not legally eligible to purchase the gun because he failed his background check due to “an admitted history of alcohol abuse, and a charge for domestic battery involving his wife.”

Looks like the laws protected us from a potentially dangerous individual. They work when you try to legally purchase a firearm.

I had heard about this a while ago. People who complain about how easy it is to buy a gun have never actually tried to buy one. Sure, for folks like me who have no criminal record it is easy, as it should be. The last gun I bought in June took me about 5 minutes to buy, but I have my CC permit which makes it even easier to buy.

What about personal sales? Do they have the same standard? Genuine question.

I think you already know the answer. How many private citizens have access to that database? Genuine question.

Are you proposing confiscation to assure no personal sales occur? What is your "fix"? Do you think the criminal element will "follow the rules" anyway? Genuine question.
11-18-2017 08:27 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


DexterDevil Offline
DCTID
*

Posts: 5,008
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation: 218
I Root For: EMU, DCFC
Location: Jackson, Mi
Post: #5
RE: Gun Laws Work
(11-18-2017 08:08 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-17-2017 11:11 PM)dfarr Wrote:  
(11-17-2017 06:48 PM)miko33 Wrote:  Apologies if this has been posted before, but I stumbled across this just now. Evidently a reporter for the Chicago Sun Times tried to buy an AR-15 to demonstrate how easy it is for someone to buy an "assault" rifle. Here is how it went down...

Gun Laws in Action?

Quote:Neil Steinberg, a journalist at the Chicago Sun-Times, tried to buy a semi-automatic rifle at Maxon Shooter’s Supplies in Des Plaines, Illinois, following the Orlando nightclub massacre, to prove how easy it was to obtain an “assault rifle.”

To make the purchase, Steinberg needed a Firearm’s Owners’ Identification Card (FOID), which he had, and he needed to fill out the background check forms that are required to buy a firearm.

During the 24-hour waiting period, the gun store informed Steinberg that he was not legally eligible to purchase the gun because he failed his background check due to “an admitted history of alcohol abuse, and a charge for domestic battery involving his wife.”

Looks like the laws protected us from a potentially dangerous individual. They work when you try to legally purchase a firearm.

I had heard about this a while ago. People who complain about how easy it is to buy a gun have never actually tried to buy one. Sure, for folks like me who have no criminal record it is easy, as it should be. The last gun I bought in June took me about 5 minutes to buy, but I have my CC permit which makes it even easier to buy.

What about personal sales? Do they have the same standard? Genuine question.

My personal buys don’t, just the way I like it.
11-18-2017 08:39 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
rath v2.0 Offline
Wartime Consigliere
*

Posts: 51,147
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation: 2147
I Root For: Civil Disobedience
Location: Tip Of The Mitt

Donators
Post: #6
RE: Gun Laws Work
I'll get in trouble with other gun proponents but if I the left wouldn't so obviously just use it as a an entry into more and more future restriction, I'd be fine with having to go through a FFL to xfer privately. As long as inter family transfers and lending were expressly excluded. It would be like a $20-25 tax on xfers.

But it would be just an avenue for move government intrusion so it won't happen.
11-18-2017 09:31 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UCF08 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 12,262
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 211
I Root For: UCF
Location:
Post: #7
RE: Gun Laws Work
(11-18-2017 08:27 AM)Crebman Wrote:  
(11-18-2017 08:08 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-17-2017 11:11 PM)dfarr Wrote:  
(11-17-2017 06:48 PM)miko33 Wrote:  Apologies if this has been posted before, but I stumbled across this just now. Evidently a reporter for the Chicago Sun Times tried to buy an AR-15 to demonstrate how easy it is for someone to buy an "assault" rifle. Here is how it went down...

Gun Laws in Action?

Quote:Neil Steinberg, a journalist at the Chicago Sun-Times, tried to buy a semi-automatic rifle at Maxon Shooter’s Supplies in Des Plaines, Illinois, following the Orlando nightclub massacre, to prove how easy it was to obtain an “assault rifle.”

To make the purchase, Steinberg needed a Firearm’s Owners’ Identification Card (FOID), which he had, and he needed to fill out the background check forms that are required to buy a firearm.

During the 24-hour waiting period, the gun store informed Steinberg that he was not legally eligible to purchase the gun because he failed his background check due to “an admitted history of alcohol abuse, and a charge for domestic battery involving his wife.”

Looks like the laws protected us from a potentially dangerous individual. They work when you try to legally purchase a firearm.

I had heard about this a while ago. People who complain about how easy it is to buy a gun have never actually tried to buy one. Sure, for folks like me who have no criminal record it is easy, as it should be. The last gun I bought in June took me about 5 minutes to buy, but I have my CC permit which makes it even easier to buy.

What about personal sales? Do they have the same standard? Genuine question.

I think you already know the answer. How many private citizens have access to that database? Genuine question.

Are you proposing confiscation to assure no personal sales occur? What is your "fix"? Do you think the criminal element will "follow the rules" anyway? Genuine question.

1. No, I do not know the answer to that question, which is why I asked. Im assuming from your answer that they do not, but you weren't really clear.

2. I don't see what the fact criminality will always exist has to do with a question about private gun sales. I have proposed no "fix" because at this point I haven't even isolated what I'd consider a problem.

People here need to stop placing meaning into posts that don't exist, it's like some posters around here can't imagine someone coming to a discussion without their minds made upon the issue in its entirety.
11-18-2017 09:52 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Crebman Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 9,407
Joined: Apr 2007
Reputation: 552
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #8
RE: Gun Laws Work
(11-18-2017 09:52 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-18-2017 08:27 AM)Crebman Wrote:  
(11-18-2017 08:08 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-17-2017 11:11 PM)dfarr Wrote:  
(11-17-2017 06:48 PM)miko33 Wrote:  Apologies if this has been posted before, but I stumbled across this just now. Evidently a reporter for the Chicago Sun Times tried to buy an AR-15 to demonstrate how easy it is for someone to buy an "assault" rifle. Here is how it went down...

Gun Laws in Action?


Looks like the laws protected us from a potentially dangerous individual. They work when you try to legally purchase a firearm.

I had heard about this a while ago. People who complain about how easy it is to buy a gun have never actually tried to buy one. Sure, for folks like me who have no criminal record it is easy, as it should be. The last gun I bought in June took me about 5 minutes to buy, but I have my CC permit which makes it even easier to buy.

What about personal sales? Do they have the same standard? Genuine question.

I think you already know the answer. How many private citizens have access to that database? Genuine question.

Are you proposing confiscation to assure no personal sales occur? What is your "fix"? Do you think the criminal element will "follow the rules" anyway? Genuine question.

1. No, I do not know the answer to that question, which is why I asked. Im assuming from your answer that they do not, but you weren't really clear.

2. I don't see what the fact criminality will always exist has to do with a question about private gun sales. I have proposed no "fix" because at this point I haven't even isolated what I'd consider a problem.

People here need to stop placing meaning into posts that don't exist, it's like some posters around here can't imagine someone coming to a discussion without their minds made upon the issue in its entirety.

Well, what makes people who own guns so touchy is that they know there is an element that would like nothing more than to have the government confiscate guns under the guise that it would prevent gun violence - not to mention gun ownership is a constitutionally protected citizens right.

FYI, don't assume I'm one of those "gun nuts". While I was a hunter earlier in my life and owned guns, I haven't had one on my possession for at least 30 years. With that, I'm still a staunch believer in the 2nd amendment.
11-18-2017 11:21 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UCF08 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 12,262
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 211
I Root For: UCF
Location:
Post: #9
RE: Gun Laws Work
(11-18-2017 11:21 AM)Crebman Wrote:  
(11-18-2017 09:52 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-18-2017 08:27 AM)Crebman Wrote:  
(11-18-2017 08:08 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-17-2017 11:11 PM)dfarr Wrote:  I had heard about this a while ago. People who complain about how easy it is to buy a gun have never actually tried to buy one. Sure, for folks like me who have no criminal record it is easy, as it should be. The last gun I bought in June took me about 5 minutes to buy, but I have my CC permit which makes it even easier to buy.

What about personal sales? Do they have the same standard? Genuine question.

I think you already know the answer. How many private citizens have access to that database? Genuine question.

Are you proposing confiscation to assure no personal sales occur? What is your "fix"? Do you think the criminal element will "follow the rules" anyway? Genuine question.

1. No, I do not know the answer to that question, which is why I asked. Im assuming from your answer that they do not, but you weren't really clear.

2. I don't see what the fact criminality will always exist has to do with a question about private gun sales. I have proposed no "fix" because at this point I haven't even isolated what I'd consider a problem.

People here need to stop placing meaning into posts that don't exist, it's like some posters around here can't imagine someone coming to a discussion without their minds made upon the issue in its entirety.

Well, what makes people who own guns so touchy is that they know there is an element that would like nothing more than to have the government confiscate guns under the guise that it would prevent gun violence - not to mention gun ownership is a constitutionally protected citizens right.

FYI, don't assume I'm one of those "gun nuts". While I was a hunter earlier in my life and owned guns, I haven't had one on my possession for at least 30 years. With that, I'm still a staunch believer in the 2nd amendment.

I think youd be surprised at how small that segment of the left actually is. There are plenty of democrats who own firearms, and even more who would laugh at the notion that they should take law abiding citizens guns. The extreme anti-gun left narrative is more a creation of the right than the reality of the left IME, and I'd think most polling shows this.
11-18-2017 11:35 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
dfarr Offline
Murse Practitioner
*

Posts: 9,402
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation: 166
I Root For: UAB
Location:

BlazerTalk AwardBlazerTalk Award
Post: #10
RE: Gun Laws Work
(11-18-2017 08:08 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-17-2017 11:11 PM)dfarr Wrote:  
(11-17-2017 06:48 PM)miko33 Wrote:  Apologies if this has been posted before, but I stumbled across this just now. Evidently a reporter for the Chicago Sun Times tried to buy an AR-15 to demonstrate how easy it is for someone to buy an "assault" rifle. Here is how it went down...

Gun Laws in Action?

Quote:Neil Steinberg, a journalist at the Chicago Sun-Times, tried to buy a semi-automatic rifle at Maxon Shooter’s Supplies in Des Plaines, Illinois, following the Orlando nightclub massacre, to prove how easy it was to obtain an “assault rifle.”

To make the purchase, Steinberg needed a Firearm’s Owners’ Identification Card (FOID), which he had, and he needed to fill out the background check forms that are required to buy a firearm.

During the 24-hour waiting period, the gun store informed Steinberg that he was not legally eligible to purchase the gun because he failed his background check due to “an admitted history of alcohol abuse, and a charge for domestic battery involving his wife.”

Looks like the laws protected us from a potentially dangerous individual. They work when you try to legally purchase a firearm.

I had heard about this a while ago. People who complain about how easy it is to buy a gun have never actually tried to buy one. Sure, for folks like me who have no criminal record it is easy, as it should be. The last gun I bought in June took me about 5 minutes to buy, but I have my CC permit which makes it even easier to buy.

What about personal sales? Do they have the same standard? Genuine question.

Depends on who you're selling it to. If i'm selling it to a family member or a friend then there is no paperwork needed because I know the person isn't dangerous.

Now, if I were to sell to a stranger, then to protect myself you can arrange it through a FFL dealer where they will actually do the background check for a small fee.

I'm not a big time gun person, I only have 2 pistols and a shotgun, but my brother in law is and thats how he does his sales to people that he doesn't know.
11-18-2017 11:42 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


UCF08 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 12,262
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 211
I Root For: UCF
Location:
Post: #11
RE: Gun Laws Work
(11-18-2017 11:42 AM)dfarr Wrote:  
(11-18-2017 08:08 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-17-2017 11:11 PM)dfarr Wrote:  
(11-17-2017 06:48 PM)miko33 Wrote:  Apologies if this has been posted before, but I stumbled across this just now. Evidently a reporter for the Chicago Sun Times tried to buy an AR-15 to demonstrate how easy it is for someone to buy an "assault" rifle. Here is how it went down...

Gun Laws in Action?

Quote:Neil Steinberg, a journalist at the Chicago Sun-Times, tried to buy a semi-automatic rifle at Maxon Shooter’s Supplies in Des Plaines, Illinois, following the Orlando nightclub massacre, to prove how easy it was to obtain an “assault rifle.”

To make the purchase, Steinberg needed a Firearm’s Owners’ Identification Card (FOID), which he had, and he needed to fill out the background check forms that are required to buy a firearm.

During the 24-hour waiting period, the gun store informed Steinberg that he was not legally eligible to purchase the gun because he failed his background check due to “an admitted history of alcohol abuse, and a charge for domestic battery involving his wife.”

Looks like the laws protected us from a potentially dangerous individual. They work when you try to legally purchase a firearm.

I had heard about this a while ago. People who complain about how easy it is to buy a gun have never actually tried to buy one. Sure, for folks like me who have no criminal record it is easy, as it should be. The last gun I bought in June took me about 5 minutes to buy, but I have my CC permit which makes it even easier to buy.

What about personal sales? Do they have the same standard? Genuine question.

Depends on who you're selling it to. If i'm selling it to a family member or a friend then there is no paperwork needed because I know the person isn't dangerous.

Now, if I were to sell to a stranger, then to protect myself you can arrange it through a FFL dealer where they will actually do the background check for a small fee.

I'm not a big time gun person, I only have 2 pistols and a shotgun, but my brother in law is and thats how he does his sales to people that he doesn't know.

That seems like an entirely reasonable way to handle that sort of sale.
11-18-2017 11:45 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Crebman Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 9,407
Joined: Apr 2007
Reputation: 552
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #12
RE: Gun Laws Work
(11-18-2017 11:45 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-18-2017 11:42 AM)dfarr Wrote:  
(11-18-2017 08:08 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-17-2017 11:11 PM)dfarr Wrote:  
(11-17-2017 06:48 PM)miko33 Wrote:  Apologies if this has been posted before, but I stumbled across this just now. Evidently a reporter for the Chicago Sun Times tried to buy an AR-15 to demonstrate how easy it is for someone to buy an "assault" rifle. Here is how it went down...

Gun Laws in Action?


Looks like the laws protected us from a potentially dangerous individual. They work when you try to legally purchase a firearm.

I had heard about this a while ago. People who complain about how easy it is to buy a gun have never actually tried to buy one. Sure, for folks like me who have no criminal record it is easy, as it should be. The last gun I bought in June took me about 5 minutes to buy, but I have my CC permit which makes it even easier to buy.

What about personal sales? Do they have the same standard? Genuine question.

Depends on who you're selling it to. If i'm selling it to a family member or a friend then there is no paperwork needed because I know the person isn't dangerous.

Now, if I were to sell to a stranger, then to protect myself you can arrange it through a FFL dealer where they will actually do the background check for a small fee.

I'm not a big time gun person, I only have 2 pistols and a shotgun, but my brother in law is and thats how he does his sales to people that he doesn't know.

That seems like an entirely reasonable way to handle that sort of sale.

Yep.
11-18-2017 12:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UCF08 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 12,262
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 211
I Root For: UCF
Location:
Post: #13
RE: Gun Laws Work
(11-18-2017 12:14 PM)Crebman Wrote:  
(11-18-2017 11:45 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-18-2017 11:42 AM)dfarr Wrote:  
(11-18-2017 08:08 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-17-2017 11:11 PM)dfarr Wrote:  I had heard about this a while ago. People who complain about how easy it is to buy a gun have never actually tried to buy one. Sure, for folks like me who have no criminal record it is easy, as it should be. The last gun I bought in June took me about 5 minutes to buy, but I have my CC permit which makes it even easier to buy.

What about personal sales? Do they have the same standard? Genuine question.

Depends on who you're selling it to. If i'm selling it to a family member or a friend then there is no paperwork needed because I know the person isn't dangerous.

Now, if I were to sell to a stranger, then to protect myself you can arrange it through a FFL dealer where they will actually do the background check for a small fee.

I'm not a big time gun person, I only have 2 pistols and a shotgun, but my brother in law is and thats how he does his sales to people that he doesn't know.

That seems like an entirely reasonable way to handle that sort of sale.

Yep.

I don't think that requiring the same thing for all private sales would be unreasonable, unless someone can present a compelling argument otherwise.
11-18-2017 12:24 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Kaplony Offline
Palmetto State Deplorable

Posts: 25,393
Joined: Apr 2013
I Root For: Newberry
Location: SC
Post: #14
RE: Gun Laws Work
I wouldn't have a problem with universal background checks if:


A. They were available either on the phone or online so you didn't have to deal with an outside party

B. They were free of charge

and

C. They were instantaneous so there isn't a long delay.

Fix that and I'll be on board, but as long as I would have to deal with an outside party to the transaction to run it and pay a fee to sell my own property I'll oppose it until the end.
11-19-2017 11:55 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kronke Offline
Banned

Posts: 29,379
Joined: Apr 2010
I Root For: Arsenal / StL
Location: Missouri
Post: #15
RE: Gun Laws Work
(11-18-2017 09:31 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  I'll get in trouble with other gun proponents but if I the left wouldn't so obviously just use it as a an entry into more and more future restriction, I'd be fine with having to go through a FFL to xfer privately. As long as inter family transfers and lending were expressly excluded. It would be like a $20-25 tax on xfers.

But it would be just an avenue for move government intrusion so it won't happen.

If they were ever to get universal background checks, the next step would be to complain that it doesn't work without universal registration. And when they get universal registration is when they'll start sending you letters to turn them in or go to jail.

[Image: Screen-Shot-2013-11-27-at-9.31.12-AM.png]
(This post was last modified: 11-19-2017 12:51 PM by Kronke.)
11-19-2017 12:47 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
rath v2.0 Offline
Wartime Consigliere
*

Posts: 51,147
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation: 2147
I Root For: Civil Disobedience
Location: Tip Of The Mitt

Donators
Post: #16
RE: Gun Laws Work
Oh, I know. It's all incrementalism. Registration is a no go...no way no how.
11-19-2017 01:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.