(11-18-2017 10:51 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  

(11-17-2017 06:41 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(11-17-2017 12:39 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-17-2017 11:53 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Ignore function is your friend.

Aww, the poor little snowflake can't handle someone presenting differing opinions than his own.

I spoke too soon. Childish insults it is.

Is that kiddo clown really still replying to me? That's kinda sad. I've had him on ignore for weeks.

Funny, I consider kids are those who want to shut their eyes to opposing opinions and pretend they don't exist. And as always, Rath is mistaken in a self-important manner. I'm not responding to him for him to see, I'm responding so others see.

(11-18-2017 08:12 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-17-2017 06:40 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(11-17-2017 12:36 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-17-2017 11:49 AM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(11-17-2017 11:18 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  Why does everything with you have to come back to simplistic partisanship? This statement is absurd, of course conservative run companies have this problem too unless you've forgotten the bloodbath at Fox, but not everything is about left or right, or liberal or conservative.

Stop with this absurd tribalism, and discuss this topic like an adult.

The irony of the bolded. Oh, the irony!!

I get that personally attacking the person making a statement is easier than addressing the very real problem they're bringing up, but you might want to make that deflection a little less obvious to those people reading.

Stop with this absurd tribalism and discuss the topic like an adult. Or continue with the childish insults. Your choice.

Words have meanings, you need to learn the meanings of words before you try to use them if you don't want to look dumb.

More childish insults? You're on fire this week.

(11-18-2017 11:51 AM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(11-18-2017 08:12 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-17-2017 06:40 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(11-17-2017 12:36 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-17-2017 11:49 AM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  The irony of the bolded. Oh, the irony!!

I get that personally attacking the person making a statement is easier than addressing the very real problem they're bringing up, but you might want to make that deflection a little less obvious to those people reading.

Stop with this absurd tribalism and discuss the topic like an adult. Or continue with the childish insults. Your choice.

Words have meanings, you need to learn the meanings of words before you try to use them if you don't want to look dumb.

More childish insults? You're on fire this week.

That wasn't an insult, it was an accurate assessment of people's reaction to those who use terms they don't understand incorrectly. Unless you're admitting you do that, in which case, yes that would make you look dumb.

(11-17-2017 12:36 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-17-2017 11:49 AM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(11-17-2017 11:18 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-17-2017 09:54 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(11-17-2017 09:52 AM)bullet Wrote:  DC and Hollywood just don't understand what a bubble they live in. This sort of stuff hasn't been tolerated in corporate America for decades. Probably not since the 70s.

Its apparently been tolerated in the corporations run by liberals. Jeff Bezos has some guys in high places that are still there despite chasing down lesbians and telling them how they are going to love their d*cks.

Why does everything with you have to come back to simplistic partisanship? This statement is absurd, of course conservative run companies have this problem too unless you've forgotten the bloodbath at Fox, but not everything is about left or right, or liberal or conservative.

Stop with this absurd tribalism, and discuss this topic like an adult.

The irony of the bolded. Oh, the irony!!

I get that personally attacking the person making a statement is easier than addressing the very real problem they're bringing up, but you might want to make that deflection a little less obvious to those people reading.

this is just delusional. you've been arguing about the manner of argument and utterly ignoring the substance of the argument since the world became one big sex crime scene. but this move is just spectacular; a recursive resort to using an accusation of avoiding the point in order to avoid the point.

I think you've achieved some heretofore unknown level of passive-aggressiveness.

(11-18-2017 12:42 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(11-17-2017 12:36 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-17-2017 11:49 AM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(11-17-2017 11:18 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-17-2017 09:54 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Its apparently been tolerated in the corporations run by liberals. Jeff Bezos has some guys in high places that are still there despite chasing down lesbians and telling them how they are going to love their d*cks.

Why does everything with you have to come back to simplistic partisanship? This statement is absurd, of course conservative run companies have this problem too unless you've forgotten the bloodbath at Fox, but not everything is about left or right, or liberal or conservative.

Stop with this absurd tribalism, and discuss this topic like an adult.

The irony of the bolded. Oh, the irony!!

I get that personally attacking the person making a statement is easier than addressing the very real problem they're bringing up, but you might want to make that deflection a little less obvious to those people reading.

this is just delusional. you've been arguing about the manner of argument and utterly ignoring the substance of the argument since the world became one big sex crime scene. but this move is just spectacular; a recursive resort to using an accusation of avoiding the point in order to avoid the point.

I think you've achieved some heretofore unknown level of passive-aggressiveness.

There was no substance in the arguments I addressed, they were nothing but pointless partisanship trying to falsely portray this problem as ideological in nature in order to confirm their ingroup bias, that was the point. I made that point explicitly clear in my original comment, would you like me to quote it for you?

(11-18-2017 04:52 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-18-2017 12:42 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(11-17-2017 12:36 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-17-2017 11:49 AM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(11-17-2017 11:18 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  Why does everything with you have to come back to simplistic partisanship? This statement is absurd, of course conservative run companies have this problem too unless you've forgotten the bloodbath at Fox, but not everything is about left or right, or liberal or conservative.

Stop with this absurd tribalism, and discuss this topic like an adult.

The irony of the bolded. Oh, the irony!!

I get that personally attacking the person making a statement is easier than addressing the very real problem they're bringing up, but you might want to make that deflection a little less obvious to those people reading.

this is just delusional. you've been arguing about the manner of argument and utterly ignoring the substance of the argument since the world became one big sex crime scene. but this move is just spectacular; a recursive resort to using an accusation of avoiding the point in order to avoid the point.

I think you've achieved some heretofore unknown level of passive-aggressiveness.

There was no substance in the arguments I addressed, they were nothing but pointless partisanship trying to falsely portray this problem as ideological in nature in order to confirm their ingroup bias, that was the point. I made that point explicitly clear in my original comment, would you like me to quote it for you?

I call for the appointment of a special prosecutor. To investigate both sides of the aisle when it comes to behavior against women (sexual assault). Let's see whose support of women is nothing more than lip service and trolling for votes. Let's prove once and for all that feminism is nothing more than an avenue for obtaining money and power.

(11-17-2017 06:41 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(11-17-2017 12:39 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-17-2017 11:53 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Ignore function is your friend.

Aww, the poor little snowflake can't handle someone presenting differing opinions than his own.

I spoke too soon. Childish insults it is.

Childish insults and making up facts is all he has. An absolutely useless poster because of it.

Can't wait till the new board platform is in place so it's like he doesn't exist.

(11-18-2017 06:57 PM)Old Blue Wrote:  I call for the appointment of a special prosecutor. To investigate both sides of the aisle when it comes to behavior against women (sexual assault). Let's see whose support of women is nothing more than lip service and trolling for votes. Let's prove once and for all that feminism is nothing more than an avenue for obtaining money and power.

As an esteemed scholar once said

I support the women’s movement, 100%.

Especially from behind.



This is all manufactured manufactured false OUTRAGE!!! from both sides. A few outliars aside, not many folks buying any of this crap.


What we’re clearly seeing here. 25 + yrs later, is certain opportunist Pols seeing the clinToon brand going the way of Tang, and working to set the stage for their next opportunistic move.

It’ll be some “Trumped” up charge from another decade old tape or something, dredged up from Stern or another ABC affiliate or somewhere, so these people can attempt to claim-

But, but, but I called for bubba to resign 20 yrs later! My hands are clean and my point was clear!

DJT, Moore, enter other non-leftist name here... has to go! See? I said Clinton was wrong!

Yea. Throwing him and his chronic loser wife under the bus no longer carries any risk nor weight. So much like yesterday’s garbage.

Lame-ass attempt at reclaiming some legitimacy/relevancy.

Ain working sweetheart. No matter how many lemming dolts fall in line...