Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Hillary Clinton: Investigating Me With Special Counsel Would Be An Abuse Of Power
Author Message
UCF08 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 12,262
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 211
I Root For: UCF
Location:
Post: #61
RE: Hillary Clinton: Investigating Me With Special Counsel Would Be An Abuse Of Power
(11-20-2017 04:18 PM)EagleX Wrote:  
(11-20-2017 04:15 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-20-2017 03:47 PM)EagleX Wrote:  
(11-20-2017 03:32 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-20-2017 02:54 PM)EagleX Wrote:  no response. I assume he's gone on to other demonstrably incorrect claims.

Like this claim?

Quote:it was a very long day of testimony, cupcake. hours and hours. many quotes to choose from. you cherry picked that one.

you're not fooling anyone.

You ever going to provide any of those quotes from that public testimony whose transcript is easily available? Nah.

what sort of "quote" are you looking for, princess?*


*be careful. this is a trap.

You tell me, you're the one who made the claim. Now you expect me to make your bogus argument for you?

wait. you want me to tell you what sort of a "quote" you are demanding from me?

did you really just say that?

Im asking you to back up your statement.

(11-18-2017 12:47 PM)EagleX Wrote:  
(11-18-2017 12:39 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-18-2017 12:13 PM)EagleX Wrote:  
(11-18-2017 08:24 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-18-2017 08:11 AM)Crebman Wrote:  Of course she thinks it would be an abuse of power. One, she wants the "politics as usual" unwritten rule of not going after a political opponent after the election is over to continue. And two, I guarantee she is deathly afraid that if anyone actually goes and digs - they'll find lots of proof of illegal activities. Her comment of "if he wins we'll all hang" speaks to exactly that.

.....betting she still wakes up with cold sweats about this.

Trumps own Attorney General testified under oath in front of Congress this week that there is no factual basis for appointing a special prosecutor and therefore appointing one would literally be an abuse of power.

Trumps own people are admitting all of this, yet here we are, having people discuss this topic like it's happening.

you've mischaracterized what he said -- three times in the same thread. do you think that if you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth?

How have I mischaracterized this exchange?





And I quote:

Republican Congressman Jordan : "What it would take to get a special counsel”.

Jeffrey Session : “It would take a factual basis that meets the standards of the appointment of a special counsel."

it was a very long day of testimony, cupcake. hours and hours. many quotes to choose from. you cherry picked that one.

you're not fooling anyone.

You made this claim, back it up. There is absolutely no way for me to know what evidence you're referring to, and the onus is on you to provide it as it is your claim. So far you've provided nothing, but maybe this time you'll actually defend your statement with evidence.

You won't of course, you'll go back to saying it's not for you to defend your own positions and statements, and continue to look foolish.
11-20-2017 05:06 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
EagleX Offline
Wake me when the suck is over
*

Posts: 14,790
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 706
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location: Happy Hour
Post: #62
RE: Hillary Clinton: Investigating Me With Special Counsel Would Be An Abuse Of Power
(11-20-2017 05:06 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-20-2017 04:18 PM)EagleX Wrote:  
(11-20-2017 04:15 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-20-2017 03:47 PM)EagleX Wrote:  
(11-20-2017 03:32 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Like this claim?


You ever going to provide any of those quotes from that public testimony whose transcript is easily available? Nah.

what sort of "quote" are you looking for, princess?*


*be careful. this is a trap.

You tell me, you're the one who made the claim. Now you expect me to make your bogus argument for you?

wait. you want me to tell you what sort of a "quote" you are demanding from me?

did you really just say that?

Im asking you to back up your statement.

(11-18-2017 12:47 PM)EagleX Wrote:  
(11-18-2017 12:39 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-18-2017 12:13 PM)EagleX Wrote:  
(11-18-2017 08:24 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  Trumps own Attorney General testified under oath in front of Congress this week that there is no factual basis for appointing a special prosecutor and therefore appointing one would literally be an abuse of power.

Trumps own people are admitting all of this, yet here we are, having people discuss this topic like it's happening.

you've mischaracterized what he said -- three times in the same thread. do you think that if you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth?

How have I mischaracterized this exchange?





And I quote:

Republican Congressman Jordan : "What it would take to get a special counsel”.

Jeffrey Session : “It would take a factual basis that meets the standards of the appointment of a special counsel."

it was a very long day of testimony, cupcake. hours and hours. many quotes to choose from. you cherry picked that one.

you're not fooling anyone.

You made this claim, back it up. There is absolutely no way for me to know what evidence you're referring to, and the onus is on you to provide it as it is your claim. So far you've provided nothing, but maybe this time you'll actually defend your statement with evidence.

You won't of course, you'll go back to saying it's not for you to defend your own positions and statements, and continue to look foolish.


for which of these "claims" would you like for me to provide "evidence"*?

1) it was a very long day of testimony.
2) the very long day of testimony lasted for hours and hours.
3) there were many quotes in the very long day of testimony that lasted for hours and hours.
4) you picked one quote from many in the very long day of testimony that lasted for hours and hours.
5) you are a cupcake.

*really. this is a trap.
(This post was last modified: 11-20-2017 05:57 PM by EagleX.)
11-20-2017 05:46 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
stinkfist Online
nuts zongo's in the house
*

Posts: 68,369
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 6859
I Root For: Mustard Buzzards
Location: who knows?
Post: #63
RE: Hillary Clinton: Investigating Me With Special Counsel Would Be An Abuse Of Power
(11-20-2017 05:46 PM)EagleX Wrote:  
(11-20-2017 05:06 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-20-2017 04:18 PM)EagleX Wrote:  
(11-20-2017 04:15 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-20-2017 03:47 PM)EagleX Wrote:  what sort of "quote" are you looking for, princess?*


*be careful. this is a trap.

You tell me, you're the one who made the claim. Now you expect me to make your bogus argument for you?

wait. you want me to tell you what sort of a "quote" you are demanding from me?

did you really just say that?

Im asking you to back up your statement.

(11-18-2017 12:47 PM)EagleX Wrote:  
(11-18-2017 12:39 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-18-2017 12:13 PM)EagleX Wrote:  you've mischaracterized what he said -- three times in the same thread. do you think that if you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth?

How have I mischaracterized this exchange?





And I quote:

Republican Congressman Jordan : "What it would take to get a special counsel”.

Jeffrey Session : “It would take a factual basis that meets the standards of the appointment of a special counsel."

it was a very long day of testimony, cupcake. hours and hours. many quotes to choose from. you cherry picked that one.

you're not fooling anyone.

You made this claim, back it up. There is absolutely no way for me to know what evidence you're referring to, and the onus is on you to provide it as it is your claim. So far you've provided nothing, but maybe this time you'll actually defend your statement with evidence.

You won't of course, you'll go back to saying it's not for you to defend your own positions and statements, and continue to look foolish.


for which of these "claims" would you like for me to provide "evidence"*?

1) it was a very long day of testimony.
2) the very long day of testimony lasted for hours and hours.
3) there were many quotes in the very long day of testimony that lasted for hours and hours.
4) you picked one quote from many in the very long day of testimony that lasted for hours and hours.
5) you are a cupcake.

*really. this is a trap.

she's easier than thirds after a thanksgiving nap....
11-20-2017 06:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UCF08 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 12,262
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 211
I Root For: UCF
Location:
Post: #64
RE: Hillary Clinton: Investigating Me With Special Counsel Would Be An Abuse Of Power
(11-20-2017 05:46 PM)EagleX Wrote:  
(11-20-2017 05:06 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-20-2017 04:18 PM)EagleX Wrote:  
(11-20-2017 04:15 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-20-2017 03:47 PM)EagleX Wrote:  what sort of "quote" are you looking for, princess?*


*be careful. this is a trap.

You tell me, you're the one who made the claim. Now you expect me to make your bogus argument for you?

wait. you want me to tell you what sort of a "quote" you are demanding from me?

did you really just say that?

Im asking you to back up your statement.

(11-18-2017 12:47 PM)EagleX Wrote:  
(11-18-2017 12:39 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-18-2017 12:13 PM)EagleX Wrote:  you've mischaracterized what he said -- three times in the same thread. do you think that if you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth?

How have I mischaracterized this exchange?





And I quote:

Republican Congressman Jordan : "What it would take to get a special counsel”.

Jeffrey Session : “It would take a factual basis that meets the standards of the appointment of a special counsel."

it was a very long day of testimony, cupcake. hours and hours. many quotes to choose from. you cherry picked that one.

you're not fooling anyone.

You made this claim, back it up. There is absolutely no way for me to know what evidence you're referring to, and the onus is on you to provide it as it is your claim. So far you've provided nothing, but maybe this time you'll actually defend your statement with evidence.

You won't of course, you'll go back to saying it's not for you to defend your own positions and statements, and continue to look foolish.


for which of these "claims" would you like for me to provide "evidence"*?

1) it was a very long day of testimony.
2) the very long day of testimony lasted for hours and hours.
3) there were many quotes in the very long day of testimony that lasted for hours and hours.
4) you picked one quote from many in the very long day of testimony that lasted for hours and hours.
5) you are a cupcake.

*really. this is a trap.

Man it's tiring being right every time you try to actually make a point.
11-20-2017 06:31 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
EagleX Offline
Wake me when the suck is over
*

Posts: 14,790
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 706
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location: Happy Hour
Post: #65
RE: Hillary Clinton: Investigating Me With Special Counsel Would Be An Abuse Of Power
(11-20-2017 06:31 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-20-2017 05:46 PM)EagleX Wrote:  
(11-20-2017 05:06 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-20-2017 04:18 PM)EagleX Wrote:  
(11-20-2017 04:15 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  You tell me, you're the one who made the claim. Now you expect me to make your bogus argument for you?

wait. you want me to tell you what sort of a "quote" you are demanding from me?

did you really just say that?

Im asking you to back up your statement.

(11-18-2017 12:47 PM)EagleX Wrote:  
(11-18-2017 12:39 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  How have I mischaracterized this exchange?





And I quote:

Republican Congressman Jordan : "What it would take to get a special counsel”.

Jeffrey Session : “It would take a factual basis that meets the standards of the appointment of a special counsel."

it was a very long day of testimony, cupcake. hours and hours. many quotes to choose from. you cherry picked that one.

you're not fooling anyone.

You made this claim, back it up. There is absolutely no way for me to know what evidence you're referring to, and the onus is on you to provide it as it is your claim. So far you've provided nothing, but maybe this time you'll actually defend your statement with evidence.

You won't of course, you'll go back to saying it's not for you to defend your own positions and statements, and continue to look foolish.


for which of these "claims" would you like for me to provide "evidence"*?

1) it was a very long day of testimony.
2) the very long day of testimony lasted for hours and hours.
3) there were many quotes in the very long day of testimony that lasted for hours and hours.
4) you picked one quote from many in the very long day of testimony that lasted for hours and hours.
5) you are a cupcake.

*really. this is a trap.

Man it's tiring being right every time you try to actually make a point.



11-20-2017 11:35 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
EagleX Offline
Wake me when the suck is over
*

Posts: 14,790
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 706
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location: Happy Hour
Post: #66
RE: Hillary Clinton: Investigating Me With Special Counsel Would Be An Abuse Of Power
(11-20-2017 02:54 PM)EagleX Wrote:  
(11-19-2017 09:03 AM)Stick4489 Wrote:  
(11-18-2017 11:43 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  
(11-18-2017 11:04 AM)jaredf29 Wrote:  Why does she need a special counsel to investigate her? Why can’t the fbi do it?

They can't do it because, as Sessions admitted under oath and unambiguously, there is no factual basis for an investigation regardless of Trumps tweets.

That's not at all what he said.

no response. I assume he's gone on to other demonstrably incorrect claims.

still no response. and you said exactly what I said upstream in this thread. odd.

perhaps he had a seizure yesterday, because his last attempt at a reply to me was utter gibberish.
11-21-2017 09:51 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.