(09-19-2017 11:15 AM)macgar32 Wrote:  

(09-18-2017 10:41 AM)holyterror Wrote:  

(09-18-2017 09:34 AM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  

(09-18-2017 09:17 AM)TIGER DENO Wrote:  talk several times about UCLA's hurt players and not mention the TIGERS players injured .

Because it would disrupt the planned narrative about Rosen's unrivaled greatness....

<jk>

It was remarkable they were able to overlook the fact that Riley outshined Rosen and actually got the win.

If I were drafting I am still taking Rosen even if that is the only game I watched.

Riley played well and had awesome stats but a closer look tells a larger story.

Agree.

Rosen made three really bad throws...bad decisions. Some of that could have been an unhealthy disrespect for the opponent, and some of it was our kids making plays to take advantage of big mistakes.

But for much of the game, he was cool and made great throws. A team that scores 45 can hardly blame their offense, three massive mistakes notwithstanding. The old cliche that we would have blown them out had they had an ordinary QB applies.

(09-18-2017 09:31 AM)TIGER DENO Wrote:  

(09-18-2017 09:21 AM)BinghamptonNed Wrote:  

(09-18-2017 09:17 AM)TIGER DENO Wrote:  talk several times about UCLA's hurt players and not mention the TIGERS players injured .

because we have such depth, the next guy just stepped up!

I guess , but not to even mention at least Dillion was an insult imo . I think he would've had an impact on this game as well as a couple of other players.

Dillon was mentioned in the telecast

(09-18-2017 04:29 PM)tigernole79 Wrote:  I know when JJ got hurt, she mentioned it. But it was brought up a couple of times that UCLA had multiple hurt players. Not to mention their LB #2 sat out the first half, which was apparently much more important than Swamp Donkey.... although both are starters.

To give them credit, they were two of the more unbiased and not obnoxious broadcasters I have heard. I can't listen to some because they have to either scream every other play or they have to out coach everyone.

I wouldn't call them unbiased. ESPN was having them really pushing Josh Rosen....as he is a future #1 or #2 pick in the NFL draft.

(09-19-2017 11:30 AM)JerryJeff Wrote:  

(09-19-2017 09:20 AM)Claw Wrote:  I thought it was a good broadcast. It enhanced the game rather than detracting.

That woman's voice is like fingernails on a chalk board to me. That's my only complaint.

Me too. I have a hard time with many women's voices on radio and tv.

Not all, but way more than men.

(09-18-2017 08:34 PM)MonsterTigerBlue Wrote:  Beth Mowins I actually thought she was very professional, called the plays very well, kept up with down and distance, knew the
players somewhat on both teams. Her one liners were just a cheesy as anyone else, I have heard. She knows the game ! I did
not even know who the lady was , dont know her background. Heard some say she was a problem and I listened on the replay and
came away just as impressed. Hate on me if you must but I enjoyed her broadcast. Very professional.

Its. Just. Her. Voice.
Dunno how any guy could maintain a boner listening to her talk ...pardon my french.

I'll take the Beth lady over Rod Gilmore any day. If we had that clown then we would have heard how great the P5 is how Memphis doesn't belong on the field.