(05-26-2017 12:05 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  

(05-26-2017 11:58 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(05-26-2017 11:52 AM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  So if I am getting this right to hell with the Geneva Conventions, collateral damage, and any sense of morality. If the only way to actually "win" is to kill all of them more cruelly and savagely than they want to do to us then I'd rather lose.

Stand face to face with an ISIS fighter. Would you still rather lose? Would you rather have more of them in the US, attacking women and children through cowardly acts?

I'm sorry but if you stoop to the stuff posted here you lose any moral high ground to call them evil or cowards. Now if you want to cut the crap and just say screw morality that's fine. If you want to believe that all people are inherently evil and they will never change and we have to wipe them off the face of the earth at least that would be honest. You can't say you are better than them though if you advocate stooping to their level to win.

I'll ask you this question when Iran gets the bomb and uses it in an American city, killing millions of innocent people. Do you really think that they care if innocents are killed or not? The Manchester bombing tells me they don't. So you have your answer there already.