(05-23-2017 11:08 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  I love how people here claim Obama did nothing in terms of national security, and then claim he did illegal searches in a different thread. Oh well it allows me to start another thread on something idiotic Trump does in return. And since that happens on a daily basis, keep posting those Obama threads. It gives me more incentive to post something like the video where Melania slaps Trump's hand away as if to say keep those tiny little hands away from my body you creep.

sad. too dense to understand what was happening there.


Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

Really surprised this hasn't gotten more traction, especially around here.

Thousands of people over more than 5 years and a sharp rebuke from the FISA court itself, which is essentially a rubber stamp for approving these warrants.

This is one of these topics that has some real there, there.

I remember, not too long ago, that when we mentioned Trump and wiretaps, the libturds would laugh.

The laughter is gone. Replaced by crapping of the pants.

(05-25-2017 06:21 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  Really surprised this hasn't gotten more traction, especially around here.

Thousands of people over more than 5 years and a sharp rebuke from the FISA court itself, which is essentially a rubber stamp for approving these warrants.

This is one of these topics that has some real there, there.

I like how Fox was reported that the BOTH the Times and Post have yet to report it. Nancy Pelosi's comment on a FIVE year track record of illegal spying was thay she had not been briefed. Dont they have an oversight function? Or maybe it goes "off line+ when Democrats are in office. Slimiest bunch on earth that Obama-Clinton trash.

(05-26-2017 12:04 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(05-25-2017 06:21 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  Really surprised this hasn't gotten more traction, especially around here.

Thousands of people over more than 5 years and a sharp rebuke from the FISA court itself, which is essentially a rubber stamp for approving these warrants.

This is one of these topics that has some real there, there.

I like how Fox was reported that the BOTH the Times and Post have yet to report it. Nancy Pelosi's comment on a FIVE year track record of illegal spying was thay she had not been briefed. Dont they have an oversight function? Or maybe it goes "off line+ when Democrats are in office. Slimiest bunch on earth that Obama-Clinton trash.

She "isn't aware".

This one has legs. It's ALL right there. The socialists thought they had it in the bag for the next 40 years as swamp critter Carville said, then woop! Funny thing, the people aren't as backwards, stupid and distracted as the sneering left thought they were.

"If that bastard wins we all hang from nooses".


Hunh. Probably a bit over the top as we haven't hanged anyone for treason since the Cank was probably in middle school, but this does come across as a moment of concern.

Just how deep is the Deep State?

Deepity deep deep

Shock: Complete MSM News Blackout on NSA Illegal Spying Bombshell

Quote:On Wednesday, investigative news site Circa News broke a blockbuster story about illegal spying during the Obama years. So far, only Fox News and a handful of conservative websites have covered the bombshell news. According to Newsbusters, the big three networks -- ABC, CBS, and NBC -- have completely omitted the story from their evening broadcasts. So have the Washington Post, the New York Times, and every other major mainstream media outlet. They've opted instead to cover RussiaGate fodder that continues to bear little fruit and negative news about Donald Trump.

"Trump shoved someone in Brussels today!" every mainstream media news outlet in America reported ad nauseam on Thursday.

In their report, Circa revealed that "the National Security Agency under former President Barack Obama routinely violated American privacy protections while scouring through overseas intercepts and failed to disclose the extent of the problems until the final days before Donald Trump was elected president last fall."

“More than one in 20 internet searches conducted by the National Security Agency, involving Americans, during the Obama administration violated constitutional privacy protections,” Fox News’ Bret Baier reported near the top of Special Report Wednesday evening. “And that practice went on for years. Not only that, but the Obama administration was harshly rebuked by the FISA court for doing it.”

Chief Washington Correspondent James Rosen cut to the chase: “On the day President Obama visited Los Angeles last October to yuk it up with Jimmy Kimmel, lawyers for the National Security Agency were quietly informing the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that NSA had systematically violated the rights of countless Americans.”


Via Newsbusters:

“Declassified documents, first obtained by the news site Circa, show the FISA court sharply rebuked the administration,” Rosen noted as he began to read a passage from the FISA court’s opinion. “’With greater frequency than previously disclosed to the Court, NSA analysts had used U.S. person identifiers to query the results of internet ‘upstream’ collection, even though NSA’s Section 702 minimization procedures prohibited such queries.’”
The Fox News reporter was intrigued by the documents because: “These disclosers are timely though, as Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act—one of the primary means by which U.S. citizens are caught up in incidental surveillance—is up for reauthorization, Bret, by the Congress at year’s end.”

John Soloman, one of the Circa reporters who broke the story, talked with Rosen and told him that “tonight, for the first time, we can say confidently that there's been a finding that some of that espionage, that spying on Americans, actually violated the law.”

The condemning evidence seemed to have no end, as Rosen reported that:

The documents show it was back in 2011 that the FISA court first determined NSA's procedures to be, quote, “statutorily and constitutionally deficient with respect to their protection of U.S. person information.” Five years later, two weeks before Election Day, the judges learned that NSA had never adequately enacted the changes it had promised to make. The NSA inspector general and its office of compliance for operations “have been conducting other reviews covering different time periods,” the judges noted, “with preliminary results suggesting that the problem is widespread during all periods of review.”

Rosen had also mentioned how “the judges blasted NSA’s ‘institutional ‘lack of candor’’ and added ‘This is a very serious fourth amendment issue.’”

https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/05/25/...bombshell/

(05-25-2017 06:21 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  Really surprised this hasn't gotten more traction, especially around here.

Thousands of people over more than 5 years and a sharp rebuke from the FISA court itself, which is essentially a rubber stamp for approving these warrants.

This is one of these topics that has some real there, there.

Who has time for trivialities like a President abusing his powers and violating US citizens' Fourth Amendment rights when Trump is eating TWO SCOOPS of ice cream?

(05-26-2017 12:17 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(05-26-2017 12:04 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(05-25-2017 06:21 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  Really surprised this hasn't gotten more traction, especially around here.

Thousands of people over more than 5 years and a sharp rebuke from the FISA court itself, which is essentially a rubber stamp for approving these warrants.

This is one of these topics that has some real there, there.

I like how Fox was reported that the BOTH the Times and Post have yet to report it. Nancy Pelosi's comment on a FIVE year track record of illegal spying was thay she had not been briefed. Dont they have an oversight function? Or maybe it goes "off line+ when Democrats are in office. Slimiest bunch on earth that Obama-Clinton trash.

She "isn't aware".

This one has legs. It's ALL right there. The socialists thought they had it in the bag for the next 40 years as swamp critter Carville said, then woop! Funny thing, the people aren't as backwards, stupid and distracted as the sneering left thought they were.

"If that bastard wins we all hang from nooses".


Hunh. Probably a bit over the top as we haven't hanged anyone for treason since the Cank was probably in middle school, but this does come across as a moment of concern.

Just how deep is the Deep State?

Deepity deep deep

Exactly, Lol...but it was impossible for Trump to be surveilled because that was not "the policy" of the Obama White House and because it was illegal for the president to order such action. When will people understand that the word "illegal" doesn't stop arrogant criminals---especially those that are convinced they are above the law like Hillary and Obama? So much for the often repeated "8 years without a s scandal phrase".

Just like Hillary holding on to FBI files on her husbands opponents long after She was told to turn them over.