Really Machiavelli, I've got more Russian connections than a lot of these people.

The witchhunt is ridiculous.

Is this the same Brennen that voted for the Communist Party candidate in the 1976 presidential election?

This board is a laugh a minute.

I will let that right wing Senator from California answer if there is any proof of Russian collusion. For the morally bankrupt libs, listen carefully.

(05-23-2017 10:28 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  I encountered and am aware of information and intelligence that revealed contacts and interactions between Russian officials and U.S. persons involved in the Trump campaign that I was concerned about because of known Russian efforts to suborn such individuals," he told lawmakers. "And it raised questions in my mind again whether or not the Russians were able to gain the cooperation of those individuals."

OH my god... person a, an American talked to person b... a Russian official!

It's a national crisis!!! Doesn't matter, that we don't have proof that it was about manipulation of something... (Hell, has anybody ever explained how the Russians manipulated this election in the first place?)

Brain wave machines to make people vote a certain way?

{/sarcasm}

(05-23-2017 10:35 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Brennan says "sometimes people only realize they've gone down a treasonous path" once it's already too late. A chilling hint?

Introspection

RussiaGhazi!

(05-23-2017 10:32 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  In other words, he knows of nothing illegal.


no you haven't seen the evidence. HE HAS and he had concerns of collusion.................. Case closed on evidence. Quit saying it. It's beyond stupid.

He said he was "aware" of Intelligence and information of contacts which Is super vague. He hasn't even said "I've seen evidence that establishes collusion." He said he has "concerns" about that being being a possibility. Basically your thread title is not supported by what you posted. When actual evidence comes out, I'll believe it. For now, we keep getting more of the same, i.e. nothing.

(05-23-2017 10:36 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  So whats illegal


Just treason...................

So talking to a Russian is treasonous now? Holy crap, come arrest me.. two of my co-workers were Russian transplants

(05-23-2017 10:39 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  

(05-23-2017 10:36 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  So whats illegal


Just treason...................

So talking to a Russian is treasonous now? Holy crap, come arrest me.. two of my co-workers were Russian transplants

****... I guess I am going to be arrested for drinking vodka now!!!

(05-23-2017 10:38 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(05-23-2017 10:35 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Brennan says "sometimes people only realize they've gone down a treasonous path" once it's already too late. A chilling hint?

Introspection

Is Brennan talking about himself? Well known he is a Commie.

(05-23-2017 10:39 AM)Jugnaut Wrote:  

(05-23-2017 10:32 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  In other words, he knows of nothing illegal.


no you haven't seen the evidence. HE HAS and he had concerns of collusion.................. Case closed on evidence. Quit saying it. It's beyond stupid.

He said he was "aware" of Intelligence and information of contacts which Is super vague.

Because he knows if he releases a name, or even leads people to believe who he is talking about, he is going to the federal pound him in the ass prison.

Again, it is ILLEGAL to unmask and leak names of civilians.

(05-23-2017 10:43 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(05-23-2017 10:39 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  

(05-23-2017 10:36 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  So whats illegal


Just treason...................

So talking to a Russian is treasonous now? Holy crap, come arrest me.. two of my co-workers were Russian transplants

****... I guess I am going to be arrested for drinking vodka now!!!

Im starting to like Russians better than democrats. They need a new message.

(05-23-2017 10:06 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Asked by Rep. Tom Rooney (R-Fla.) if he saw any evidence of collusion during his time as CIA director, Brennan responded: “I was worried by a number of the contacts that the Russians had with U.S. persons.”

LOL, you trolling bastard! Something wrong with text immediately below your original quote?

Quote:Asked by Rep. Tom Rooney (R-Fla.) if he saw any evidence of collusion during his time as CIA director, Brennan responded: “I was worried by a number of the contacts that the Russians had with U.S. persons.”

Brennan said he did not know whether collusion existed. "But I know that there was a sufficient basis of information and intelligence that required further investigation by the bureau to determine whether or not U.S. persons were actively conspiring and colluding with Russian officials."

(05-23-2017 10:02 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  There's plenty there you just have to look. Might have to stop using Fox News as your goto News. You probably won't see much if you are hanging out in their news media.


http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/23...ign-238719

Quote:WOLF BLITZER, CNN: The last time we spoke, Senator, I asked you if you had actually seen evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians, and you said to me -- and I am quoting you now -- you said, ‘not at this time.’ Has anything changed since we spoke last?

SEN. FEINSTEIN: Well, no -- no, it hasn't...

BLITZER: But, I just want to be precise, Senator. In all of the -- you have had access from the Intelligence Committee, from the Judiciary Committee, all of the access you have had to very sensitive information, so far you have not seen any evidence of collusion, is that right?

SEN. FEINSTEIN: Well, evidence that would establish that there's collusion. There are all kinds of rumors around, there are newspaper stories, but that's not necessarily evidence.

Feinstein

Quote:STEIN: -- but just to be clear, we haven't -- there have been no actual evidence yet.

WATERS: No, it has not been. No, it has not and I want you to know, every time I've talked about impeachment, I’ve said we've got to connect the dots, we’ve got to get the facts, we’ve got to do the investigation. That is what leads to impeachment and I also said that Trump will lead us right there.

Waters

[/quote]But Clapper then went on to say that to his knowledge there was “no evidence” of “collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians.”

“We did not include any evidence in our report – and I say ‘our,’ that’s NSA, FBI and CIA, with my office, the Director of National Intelligence – that had anything, that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was no evidence of that included in our report.”

“I understand that,” said interviewer Chuck Todd. “But does it exist?”

“Not to my knowledge.”

“If it existed, it would have been in this report?”

“This could have unfolded or become available in the time since I left the government.,” Clapper replied, “but at the time I – we had no evidence of such collusion.”[/quote]Clapper

Quote:Matthews claimed that Trump committed “obstruction” of justice by firing Comey, who was in the midst of a nearly year-long investigation into the allegations. Buchanan, on the other hand, claimed that Comey has “something to answer for” because after such a long investigation “they haven’t got a single connection” between Trump and Russia.

“No collusion at all has been proven,” Buchanan said

Buchanan

Quote:“I just wonder what the Russians have politically, personally or financially on President Trump,” Pelosi said. “Because this is about a national security issue. Why would the president of the United States just come in and start to flirt with the idea of lifting sanctions on Russia in terms of their behavior in Eastern Europe? Why would the president of the United States question the START treaty? Why the question of the United States put Putin on a pedestal and diminish the greatness of America? There’s something wrong with this picture.”

Samantha Guthrie went on to ask if Pelosi had any proof to back up any of her claims.

“Nothing I would suggest here, but I would say this — let’s have the outside independent commission investigate all of this,” Pelosi added. “And I don’t know how many more days where new news connecting the Trump campaign to the Russians needs to come forward for the Republicans in Congress to say, ‘Let’s get to the truth.”

Pelosi

Quote:It may well be difficult to identify any criminal laws violated by the Trump campaign’s contacts with Russia. It will be important for Mueller to investigate, for example, whether anyone associated with the Trump campaign aided and abetted the hacking of e-mail accounts connected to Hillary Clinton’s campaign; that would certainly be a federal crime.

Toobin

Why do some of you let this person pull your strings like that. I know it looks like it but I don't even think he's dumb enough to believe 1/10 of what he post.

His sole mission is to get a rise out of some of you. Well at least I hope I'm correct because if not ...WOW!

(05-23-2017 10:06 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Asked by Rep. Tom Rooney (R-Fla.) if he saw any evidence of collusion during his time as CIA director, Brennan responded: “I was worried by a number of the contacts that the Russians had with U.S. persons.”

So, in other words, his answer was, "No."

You (guys) keep using that word... (evidence)
I do not think it means what you think it means

/I. Montoya

This isn't me being obtuse or turning a blind eye... This is me presenting the VERY real fact that just because you can imagine a scandal, doesn't mean there is one. PROOF requires something that is undeniable, unexplained in any other reasonable way. If you had ANYTHING remotely resembling that, there would be some charges against SOMEBODY.

It's as if you guys thing that 'volume' is a substitute for truth.

(05-23-2017 01:51 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-23-2017 10:06 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Asked by Rep. Tom Rooney (R-Fla.) if he saw any evidence of collusion during his time as CIA director, Brennan responded: “I was worried by a number of the contacts that the Russians had with U.S. persons.”

So, in other words, his answer was, "No."

exactly

(05-23-2017 10:16 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Especially now we know The Seth Ric is the likely the actual Wikileaks source.

Lies......................

lol....Now who is "ignoring" facts?

(05-23-2017 10:34 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(05-23-2017 10:28 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  "I encountered and am aware of information and intelligence that revealed contacts and interactions between Russian officials and U.S. persons involved in the Trump campaign that I was concerned about because of known Russian efforts to suborn such individuals," he told lawmakers. "And it raised questions in my mind again whether or not the Russians were able to gain the cooperation of those individuals."

They TALKED to RUSSIANS!!!!!!!

I've talked to Russians using Russian. I know many Russians. I was even in the same hotel once with the President of Azerbaijan, someone Putin knows well. RUSSIANS!!!!!!

Thats whats so funny. Talking to Russians is not illegal. In fact, COLLUDING with Russian's to release FACTUAL information about a candidate for president is not illegal. The NY Times does it all the time.