Wichita St @ Arizona
SMU @ Oregon
Cincy @ UCLA
Utah @ Houston
USC @ UCF
Memphis @ Cal
UConn @ Colorado
Arizona St @ Tulsa
Stanford @ Temple
Washington St @ ECU
Tulane @ Washington
Oregon St @ USF

Go by the standings of the previous year, never play home or away back to back.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

1 in a million chance - maybe. Probably not even that.

(04-15-2017 06:27 PM)PurpleReigns Wrote:  Wichita St @ Arizona
SMU @ Oregon
Cincy @ UCLA
Utah @ Houston
USC @ UCF
Memphis @ Cal
UConn @ Colorado
Arizona St @ Tulsa
Stanford @ Temple
Washington St @ ECU
Tulane @ Washington
Oregon St @ USF

Go by the standings of the previous year, never play home or away back to back.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I've been saying this...

aac would get demolished

(04-15-2017 08:48 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  aac would get demolished

Arizona, Oregon, UCLA, then what? Other than those three, there's not that much...

PAC 12 would be fine. Playing some lower level league in a challenge isn't going to fly.

(04-15-2017 08:55 PM)TheShocker Wrote:  

(04-15-2017 08:48 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  aac would get demolished

Arizona, Oregon, UCLA, then what? Other than those three, there's not that much...

we have a home and home with arizona starting this year...so we will see how that goes

Rumor was a couple years ago the Big East tried to have a challenge with the Pac-12, but it fell through because UCLA and Arizona didn't want to do it. If those two don't want to be in a conference challenge, why have one? I'd imagine the two flagship Pac 12 programs would respond the same way to a potential AAC challenge.

I agree with others who have said, "Just schedule better." (This means you, ECU and others who consistently finish towards the bottom.)

(04-15-2017 06:27 PM)PurpleReigns Wrote:  Wichita St @ Arizona
SMU @ Oregon
Cincy @ UCLA
Utah @ Houston
USC @ UCF
Memphis @ Cal
UConn @ Colorado
Arizona St @ Tulsa
Stanford @ Temple
Washington St @ ECU
Tulane @ Washington
Oregon St @ USF

Go by the standings of the previous year, never play home or away back to back.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Count me in favor of it. Best of both worlds as far as television appeal. I think AAC needs to put four teams in the tourney for a couple of years running before PAC 12 and ESPN think it is a good idea.

.

I would be 100% in favor of it, but I'm also nearly 100% sure the PAC 12 wouldn't go for this.

(04-15-2017 06:27 PM)PurpleReigns Wrote:  Wichita St @ Arizona
SMU @ Oregon
Cincy @ UCLA
Utah @ Houston
USC @ UCF
Memphis @ Cal
UConn @ Colorado
Arizona St @ Tulsa
Stanford @ Temple
Washington St @ ECU
Tulane @ Washington
Oregon St @ USF

Go by the standings of the previous year, never play home or away back to back.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Sean Miller doesn't have enough shirts to handle another match up with Wichita

(04-16-2017 01:10 AM)robertfoshizzle Wrote:  I would be 100% in favor of it, but I'm also nearly 100% sure the PAC 12 wouldn't go for this.

I don't think they would either, but it's worth trying.

(04-15-2017 10:52 PM)Michael in Raleigh Wrote:  Rumor was a couple years ago the Big East tried to have a challenge with the Pac-12, but it fell through because UCLA and Arizona didn't want to do it. If those two don't want to be in a conference challenge, why have one? I'd imagine the two flagship Pac 12 programs would respond the same way to a potential AAC challenge.

I agree with others who have said, "Just schedule better." (This means you, ECU and others who consistently finish towards the bottom.)

Which Big East? The original or the C7+3?

(04-16-2017 01:26 AM)TheShocker Wrote:  

(04-15-2017 10:52 PM)Michael in Raleigh Wrote:  Rumor was a couple years ago the Big East tried to have a challenge with the Pac-12, but it fell through because UCLA and Arizona didn't want to do it. If those two don't want to be in a conference challenge, why have one? I'd imagine the two flagship Pac 12 programs would respond the same way to a potential AAC challenge.

I agree with others who have said, "Just schedule better." (This means you, ECU and others who consistently finish towards the bottom.)

Which Big East? The original or the C7+3?

In today's math if a couple still means 2 than I'm sure he's referring the NEWbigeast or as you calling it, the C7+3.

I don't think I've seen anyone call them the "C7+3"

(04-16-2017 07:39 AM)BigHouston Wrote:  

(04-16-2017 01:26 AM)TheShocker Wrote:  

(04-15-2017 10:52 PM)Michael in Raleigh Wrote:  Rumor was a couple years ago the Big East tried to have a challenge with the Pac-12, but it fell through because UCLA and Arizona didn't want to do it. If those two don't want to be in a conference challenge, why have one? I'd imagine the two flagship Pac 12 programs would respond the same way to a potential AAC challenge.

I agree with others who have said, "Just schedule better." (This means you, ECU and others who consistently finish towards the bottom.)

Which Big East? The original or the C7+3?

In today's math if a couple still means 2 than I'm sure he's referring the NEWbigeast or as you calling it, the C7+3.

I don't think I've seen anyone call them the "C7+3"

It was a joke...

(04-16-2017 07:43 AM)TheShocker Wrote:  

(04-16-2017 07:39 AM)BigHouston Wrote:  

(04-16-2017 01:26 AM)TheShocker Wrote:  

(04-15-2017 10:52 PM)Michael in Raleigh Wrote:  Rumor was a couple years ago the Big East tried to have a challenge with the Pac-12, but it fell through because UCLA and Arizona didn't want to do it. If those two don't want to be in a conference challenge, why have one? I'd imagine the two flagship Pac 12 programs would respond the same way to a potential AAC challenge.

I agree with others who have said, "Just schedule better." (This means you, ECU and others who consistently finish towards the bottom.)

Which Big East? The original or the C7+3?

In today's math if a couple still means 2 than I'm sure he's referring the NEWbigeast or as you calling it, the C7+3.

I don't think I've seen anyone call them the "C7+3"

It was a joke...

Got it

We actually call the big12, the big12-2 or the bevo conference.

(04-16-2017 07:48 AM)BigHouston Wrote:  

(04-16-2017 07:43 AM)TheShocker Wrote:  

(04-16-2017 07:39 AM)BigHouston Wrote:  

(04-16-2017 01:26 AM)TheShocker Wrote:  

(04-15-2017 10:52 PM)Michael in Raleigh Wrote:  Rumor was a couple years ago the Big East tried to have a challenge with the Pac-12, but it fell through because UCLA and Arizona didn't want to do it. If those two don't want to be in a conference challenge, why have one? I'd imagine the two flagship Pac 12 programs would respond the same way to a potential AAC challenge.

I agree with others who have said, "Just schedule better." (This means you, ECU and others who consistently finish towards the bottom.)

Which Big East? The original or the C7+3?

In today's math if a couple still means 2 than I'm sure he's referring the NEWbigeast or as you calling it, the C7+3.

I don't think I've seen anyone call them the "C7+3"

It was a joke...

Got it

We actually call the big12, the big12-2 or the bevo conference.

That's where I got it from; the whole post was just me trolling.

the old big east had a challenge with the sec...it was totally lame and we beat them handily every year. Sure the top couple games were good (vs uk, florida) but the middle down Big East teams who were ncaa caliber were playing lame football school teams and it was boring. Alabama, Georgia, Auburn etc was a waste of our time. As a fan of the superior conference I wanted to end that "challenge" because it was boring.

This would be like that except the shoe would be on the other foot. The pac12 would handily beat the aac and the middle down pac 12 teams would find the middle down aac teams boring draws.

(04-15-2017 06:51 PM)TIGERCITY Wrote:  1 in a million chance - maybe. Probably not even that.

So you're telling us there's a chance!

I'm down...but they'll never go for that.