“I think that there must have been a very strong pushback from the White House about the nature of Monday’s hearing,” Schiff said. “It’s hard for me to come to any other conclusion about why an agreed-upon hearing would be suddenly canceled.”

Linky


What are they trying to hide?

MUH SCHIFF!

Actually, its not been cancelled. Its been converted to a non-public hearing, likely due to the fact that since Obama was eavesdropping on the Trump transition team, the info Obama had would have been classified.

That would be his opinion.

(03-27-2017 09:55 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  MUH SCHIFF!

Actually, its not been cancelled. Its been converted to a non-public hearing, likely due to the fact that since Obama was eavesdropping on the Trump transition team, the info Obama had would have been classified.

Wait what? You still think Obama wire tapped Trump?

(03-27-2017 10:01 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 09:55 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  MUH SCHIFF!

Actually, its not been cancelled. Its been converted to a non-public hearing, likely due to the fact that since Obama was eavesdropping on the Trump transition team, the info Obama had would have been classified.

Wait what? You still think Obama wire tapped Trump?

I know Trump was wiretapped. But what this hearing will deal with is why Obama was receiving intel on Trumps transition team after the election. (aka #WatergateOnSteroids )

(03-27-2017 10:03 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 10:01 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 09:55 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  MUH SCHIFF!

Actually, its not been cancelled. Its been converted to a non-public hearing, likely due to the fact that since Obama was eavesdropping on the Trump transition team, the info Obama had would have been classified.

Wait what? You still think Obama wire tapped Trump?

I know Trump was wiretapped. But what this hearing will deal with is why Obama was receiving intel on Trumps transition team after the election. (aka #WatergateOnSteroids )

If you know Trump was wire tapped, perhaps you could present that information to the intelligence community or Congress because they have no evidence of it.

(03-27-2017 10:04 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 10:03 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 10:01 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 09:55 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  MUH SCHIFF!

Actually, its not been cancelled. Its been converted to a non-public hearing, likely due to the fact that since Obama was eavesdropping on the Trump transition team, the info Obama had would have been classified.

Wait what? You still think Obama wire tapped Trump?

I know Trump was wiretapped. But what this hearing will deal with is why Obama was receiving intel on Trumps transition team after the election. (aka #WatergateOnSteroids )

If you know Trump was wire tapped, perhaps you could present that information to the intelligence community or Congress because they have no evidence of it.

you wanna bet?

(03-27-2017 09:55 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  MUH SCHIFF!

Actually, its not been cancelled. Its been converted to a non-public hearing, likely due to the fact that since Obama was eavesdropping on the Trump transition team, the info Obama had would have been classified.

He's full of Schiff.

(03-27-2017 10:08 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 09:55 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  MUH SCHIFF!

Actually, its not been cancelled. Its been converted to a non-public hearing, likely due to the fact that since Obama was eavesdropping on the Trump transition team, the info Obama had would have been classified.

He's full of Schiff.

bwahahahahahahahaha

From now on I'm calling BullSchiff on Fit.

(03-27-2017 09:55 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  MUH SCHIFF!

Actually, its not been cancelled. Its been converted to a non-public hearing, likely due to the fact that since Obama was eavesdropping on the Trump transition team, the info Obama had would have been classified.

Now we know why he spends so much time in florida

(03-27-2017 10:06 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 10:04 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 10:03 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 10:01 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 09:55 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  MUH SCHIFF!

Actually, its not been cancelled. Its been converted to a non-public hearing, likely due to the fact that since Obama was eavesdropping on the Trump transition team, the info Obama had would have been classified.

Wait what? You still think Obama wire tapped Trump?

I know Trump was wiretapped. But what this hearing will deal with is why Obama was receiving intel on Trumps transition team after the election. (aka #WatergateOnSteroids )

If you know Trump was wire tapped, perhaps you could present that information to the intelligence community or Congress because they have no evidence of it.

you wanna bet?

Wait a minute. Perhaps you should define "wire tapped" first.

(03-27-2017 10:10 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 10:08 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 09:55 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  MUH SCHIFF!

Actually, its not been cancelled. Its been converted to a non-public hearing, likely due to the fact that since Obama was eavesdropping on the Trump transition team, the info Obama had would have been classified.

He's full of Schiff.

bwahahahahahahahaha

From now on I'm calling BullSchiff on Fit.

(03-27-2017 10:10 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 10:08 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 09:55 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  MUH SCHIFF!

Actually, its not been cancelled. Its been converted to a non-public hearing, likely due to the fact that since Obama was eavesdropping on the Trump transition team, the info Obama had would have been classified.

He's full of Schiff.

bwahahahahahahahaha

From now on I'm calling BullSchiff on Fit.

If you want to dispute any of the facts I have presented go ahead. Make my day.

(03-27-2017 10:01 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 09:55 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  MUH SCHIFF!

Actually, its not been cancelled. Its been converted to a non-public hearing, likely due to the fact that since Obama was eavesdropping on the Trump transition team, the info Obama had would have been classified.

Wait what? You still think Obama wire tapped Trump?

Let's get to the bigger point shall we..

Do you acknowledge some classified information might need to be discussed during this hearing?

If so do you acknowledge that maybe it's best not to have it as an open, public hearing?

(03-27-2017 10:14 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 10:06 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 10:04 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 10:03 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 10:01 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Wait what? You still think Obama wire tapped Trump?

I know Trump was wiretapped. But what this hearing will deal with is why Obama was receiving intel on Trumps transition team after the election. (aka #WatergateOnSteroids )

If you know Trump was wire tapped, perhaps you could present that information to the intelligence community or Congress because they have no evidence of it.

you wanna bet?

Wait a minute. Perhaps you should define "wire tapped" first.

any surveillance on Trump or the Trump transition team.

(03-27-2017 10:21 AM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 10:01 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 09:55 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  MUH SCHIFF!

Actually, its not been cancelled. Its been converted to a non-public hearing, likely due to the fact that since Obama was eavesdropping on the Trump transition team, the info Obama had would have been classified.

Wait what? You still think Obama wire tapped Trump?

Let's get to the bigger point shall we..

Do you acknowledge some classified information might need to be discussed during this hearing?

If so do you acknowledge that maybe it's best not to have it as an open, public hearing?

The hearing with Comey was public. Whenever something was "classified" he would say it was and move on.

Why can't we just do that?

(03-27-2017 10:24 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 10:21 AM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 10:01 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 09:55 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  MUH SCHIFF!

Actually, its not been cancelled. Its been converted to a non-public hearing, likely due to the fact that since Obama was eavesdropping on the Trump transition team, the info Obama had would have been classified.

Wait what? You still think Obama wire tapped Trump?

Let's get to the bigger point shall we..

Do you acknowledge some classified information might need to be discussed during this hearing?

If so do you acknowledge that maybe it's best not to have it as an open, public hearing?

The hearing with Comey was public. Whenever something was "classified" he would say it was and move on.

Why can't we just do that?

Depending on the amount of things that are private it could make for a very useless meeting.

(03-27-2017 10:23 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 10:14 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 10:06 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 10:04 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 10:03 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  I know Trump was wiretapped. But what this hearing will deal with is why Obama was receiving intel on Trumps transition team after the election. (aka #WatergateOnSteroids )

If you know Trump was wire tapped, perhaps you could present that information to the intelligence community or Congress because they have no evidence of it.

you wanna bet?

Wait a minute. Perhaps you should define "wire tapped" first.

any surveillance on Trump or the Trump transition team.

I see so now it includes any kind of surveillance and any one on his team?

What about Obama. Does it still have to be Obama?

(03-27-2017 11:46 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 10:23 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 10:14 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 10:06 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 10:04 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  If you know Trump was wire tapped, perhaps you could present that information to the intelligence community or Congress because they have no evidence of it.

you wanna bet?

Wait a minute. Perhaps you should define "wire tapped" first.

any surveillance on Trump or the Trump transition team.

I see so now it includes any kind of surveillance and any one on his team?

What about Obama. Does it still have to be Obama?

I take it you now admit that Trump was "wiretapped" by the Obama administration, and now the only thing you can do is to say Obama didnt have the earphones on listening in, so he is not guilty?

(03-27-2017 12:07 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 11:46 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 10:23 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 10:14 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 10:06 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  you wanna bet?

Wait a minute. Perhaps you should define "wire tapped" first.

any surveillance on Trump or the Trump transition team.

I see so now it includes any kind of surveillance and any one on his team?

What about Obama. Does it still have to be Obama?

I take it you now admit that Trump was "wiretapped" by the Obama administration, and now the only thing you can do is to say Obama didnt have the earphones on listening in, so he is not guilty?

Nope, no one including you has provided any proof of that.

Quite frankly, you and Trump are the only one's who still believe that.