(03-22-2017 02:15 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Once again...that bumbling Obama who could not accomplish anything is now the greatest mastermind on the planet.

You guys crack my **** up!

Who said he's a mastermind. What he did for the intel community was actually VERY stupid, not smart.

During the press conference outside the whitehouse, the libturd media keeps screaming that if the "wiretapping" was legal, then why is this supposed to be news? Nunes reminded them that, while the surveillance was incidental and may have been legal, the leaking of information from that surveillance was a crime. It seems like the MSM is going to try to argue that this is no big deal, when in reality we are one giant step closer to finding the criminal who leaked this out.

(03-22-2017 02:17 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(03-22-2017 02:15 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Once again...that bumbling Obama who could not accomplish anything is now the greatest mastermind on the planet.

You guys crack my **** up!

Who said he's a mastermind. What he did for the intel community was actually VERY stupid, not smart.

What's he do again? With credible links please?

(03-22-2017 02:23 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-22-2017 02:17 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(03-22-2017 02:15 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Once again...that bumbling Obama who could not accomplish anything is now the greatest mastermind on the planet.

You guys crack my **** up!

Who said he's a mastermind. What he did for the intel community was actually VERY stupid, not smart.

What's he do again? With credible links please?

See the NYT story above, dumb***.

(03-22-2017 02:15 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Once again...that bumbling Obama who could not accomplish anything is now the greatest mastermind on the planet.

You guys crack my **** up!

Mastermind? uh no.

the big dope who decided to tear down some intelligence walls so that this information would get leaked by one of his hacks? Yes.

(03-22-2017 02:23 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  while the surveillance was incidental and may have been legal, the leaking of information from that surveillance was a crime.

So this is the big plan, huh? Switch gears from surveillance to leaking.


OK, but that means Trump lied.


I guess at the end of the day, if given a chance to save Trump at the cost of freeing Obama ... you'd flush both, just to spite this country that you hate so very much and has clearly given you so very little.

Let's just have a shooting civil war and be done with it. I'm bored of all of the drama.

(03-22-2017 02:30 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  

(03-22-2017 02:23 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  while the surveillance was incidental and may have been legal, the leaking of information from that surveillance was a crime.

So this is the big plan, huh? Switch gears from surveillance to leaking.

OK, but that means Trump lied.

I guess at the end of the day, if given a chance to save Trump at the cost of freeing Obama ... you'd flush both, just to spite this country that you hate so very much and has clearly given you so very little.

They were without a doubt under surveillance and the leaks were EASIER because of Obama's stupidity or he had ulterior motives.

Quote:Members of the Donald Trump transition team, possibly including Trump himself, were under surveillance

Yet another thing that only happened because Obama.

Leaks.

(03-22-2017 02:38 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  They were without a doubt under surveillance

A Russian was under surveillance. That members of Trump's transition team were incidentally observed, simply means they were in contact with this Russian.

(03-22-2017 02:52 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  

(03-22-2017 02:38 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  They were without a doubt under surveillance

A Russian was under surveillance. That members of Trump's transition team were incidentally observed, simply means they were in contact with this Russian.

which means we are one step closer to finding the criminal who leaked the information.

and it means Obama wiretapped Trump. Whether or not it was on purpose or not doesnt matter. If you end up "incidentally" getting a civilian on a wiretap, you damned well better make sure that info doesnt go anywhere.

And if you "incidentally" wiretap people of the opposition party, you damned well better make sure everyone knows its watergate if you start leaking it.

(03-22-2017 02:52 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  

(03-22-2017 02:38 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  They were without a doubt under surveillance

A Russian was under surveillance. That members of Trump's transition team were incidentally observed, simply means they were in contact with this Russian.

Water is wet.

I told you lib peeps that Trump wouldn't have made the tweet if he didn't have an end game. You guys are getting played.

(03-22-2017 02:59 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  I told you lib peeps that Trump wouldn't have made the tweet if he didn't have an end game. You guys are getting played.

That would be all well and good if Trump's own words for why he tweeted it weren't totally debunked by...well...by everyone.

(03-22-2017 02:54 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  it means Obama wiretapped Trump

It proves that he did not.

(03-22-2017 02:54 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  which means we are one step closer to finding the criminal who leaked the information.

So which is your choice:

- flush both Trump and Obama, to spite this country that you hate
- admit Trump lied

??

(03-22-2017 02:52 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  

(03-22-2017 02:38 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  They were without a doubt under surveillance

A Russian was under surveillance. That members of Trump's transition team were incidentally observed, simply means they were in contact with this Russian.

So you can't read. Why were they "unmasking"? Why was it ongoing?

http://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/2017.../99502568/

http://nypost.com/2017/03/22/nunes-trump...veillance/

I'm going with Trump lied, myself.

Probably not a big surprise, there.

(03-22-2017 03:07 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  Why were they "unmasking"?

But there is a question, which must be first answered: did Trump lie?

Only after that one is taken care of, can we get to the smaller, less important question of who leaked the info.

So...let's go to the score cards...

Releasing the Podesta e-mails, in the best interest of the nation.
Unmasking Flynn, et. al., that's a problem.

That about catch us up to speed?

(03-22-2017 12:42 PM)The Sicatoka Wrote:  So does this make Clapper's statement false or just inaccurate.

It means the Trump wasn't lying like the Libturds contend.