(02-14-2017 01:05 PM)salukiblue Wrote:  

(02-14-2017 12:47 PM)VinnieVegas Wrote:  

(02-14-2017 11:05 AM)Penny Lane Wrote:  

(02-14-2017 09:18 AM)innman Wrote:  

(02-13-2017 10:21 AM)TubbyTime Wrote:  I still stand by the fact their players are better, stronger, and have more experience.

TubbyTime = Penny Lane when it comes to objectivity or lack thereof.

Innman = Dumb Azz Can't make an informative post to save his life.

I see you are still a douchebag who insults posters.

No dog in the fight, but irony much?

He calls out everyone. I only called him out. I'm thinking most on here would agree with me. I'm betting it's a big reason why this board doesn't get much action like it used to. It's sad we can't have reasonable discussions without someone stating how much more intelligent they are than everyone else. But you are right I've put myself on his level. It'll be my last post about it.

(02-14-2017 04:00 AM)SMUleopold Wrote:  All bias aside this was good for the conference. The AAC was looking at the possibility of having only one school in the tourney and us pulling out the win helps assure the AAC of having two. Good game, too.

There is more possibility of having 3 teams than just 1. I have seen zero projections where only 1 team makes it.

(02-14-2017 12:47 PM)VinnieVegas Wrote:  

(02-14-2017 11:05 AM)Penny Lane Wrote:  

(02-14-2017 09:18 AM)innman Wrote:  

(02-13-2017 10:21 AM)TubbyTime Wrote:  

(02-13-2017 10:03 AM)salukiblue Wrote:  How does that translate to fatigue?

SMU literally played six guys yesterday. Minute totals of 39, 38, 35, 33, 28, and 27.

Heck, Cinci's starting five went: 38, 38, 36, 33, and 33.

I still stand by the fact their players are better, stronger, and have more experience.

TubbyTime = Penny Lane when it comes to objectivity or lack thereof.

Innman = Dumb Azz Can't make an informative post to save his life.

I see you are still a douchebag who insults posters.

Tit for Tat: This is one hell of an insult:

TubbyTime = Penny Lane when it comes to objectivity or lack thereof.

Ans salukiblue is right as rain on the SMU/Cincy depth issues

(02-14-2017 02:33 PM)Penny Lane Wrote:  

(02-14-2017 12:47 PM)VinnieVegas Wrote:  

(02-14-2017 11:05 AM)Penny Lane Wrote:  

(02-14-2017 09:18 AM)innman Wrote:  

(02-13-2017 10:21 AM)TubbyTime Wrote:  I still stand by the fact their players are better, stronger, and have more experience.

TubbyTime = Penny Lane when it comes to objectivity or lack thereof.

Innman = Dumb Azz Can't make an informative post to save his life.

I see you are still a douchebag who insults posters.

Tit for Tat: This is one hell of an insult:

TubbyTime = Penny Lane when it comes to objectivity or lack thereof.

Ans salukiblue is right as rain on the SMU/Cincy depth issues

I shouldn't have said anything. I brought myself down to your level. I do agree about the depth thing.

First year ROOKIE head coach with 6 scholarship players:

http://collegebasketball.ap.org/article/...m=AP_Top25

And what is my level? How did YOU personally form your opinion on what MY LEVEL is? Any particular posts or just second hand hearsay constantly posted by some wet behind the ears poster who has been on forum 6 months and tries to personally insult me every post he and a few others make? Don't really care but curious.

(02-14-2017 02:19 PM)Tiger87 Wrote:  

(02-14-2017 04:00 AM)SMUleopold Wrote:  All bias aside this was good for the conference. The AAC was looking at the possibility of having only one school in the tourney and us pulling out the win helps assure the AAC of having two. Good game, too.

There is more possibility of having 3 teams than just 1. I have seen zero projections where only 1 team makes it.

Yeah, but that wasn't the case going into the weekend. SMU was barely in the top 25 and needed a signature win. Houston hadn't won five in a row at that point and looking at a top 20 SMU team coming to town.

What a difference a day makes.

(02-14-2017 11:14 PM)SMUleopold Wrote:  

(02-14-2017 02:19 PM)Tiger87 Wrote:  

(02-14-2017 04:00 AM)SMUleopold Wrote:  All bias aside this was good for the conference. The AAC was looking at the possibility of having only one school in the tourney and us pulling out the win helps assure the AAC of having two. Good game, too.

There is more possibility of having 3 teams than just 1. I have seen zero projections where only 1 team makes it.

Yeah, but that wasn't the case going into the weekend. SMU was barely in the top 25 and needed a signature win. Houston hadn't won five in a row at that point and looking at a top 20 SMU team coming to town.

What a difference a day makes.

Nah, you've been solidly in all year. There's never been a bracketology that I've seen that had just 1 in. I have seen a few with 3 of us in. Houston, Temple and Memphis have all taken our turns on the bubble. You guys were just playing for seeding.