Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)
Open TigerLinks
 

Post Reply 
GO TIGERS GO
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
TubbyTime Offline
Banned

Posts: 1,321
Joined: Sep 2016
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #301
RE: GO TIGERS GO
(01-16-2017 05:28 PM)snowtiger Wrote:  It was part smartaleck. People here get upsetz over bad wins.

I like all wins. If they start putting *'s by the Ws and Ls, I might change my tune, though.

I view you as a wise individual, with that I don't believe you need his help in figuring out the game of basketball.
01-16-2017 05:31 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Penny Lane Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,702
Joined: Nov 2015
I Root For: Tigers &Tigers
Location: Next 40 Out
Post: #302
RE: GO TIGERS GO
(01-16-2017 05:28 PM)snowtiger Wrote:  It was part smartaleck. People here get upsetz over bad wins.

I like all wins, and it's true. The wins we we're supposed to lose do have a special flavor that's unbeatable (just to be perfectly clear).

If they start putting *'s by the Ws and Ls, I might change my tune, though.

The NCAA does. They are called good wins and bad losses. Part of criteria for making tournament.
01-16-2017 05:34 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
snowtiger Offline
Hall of Flamers
*

Posts: 33,317
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation: 3707
I Root For: W's!!!
Location: Cascade Volcanic Arc
Post: #303
RE: GO TIGERS GO
(01-16-2017 05:31 PM)TubbyTime Wrote:  
(01-16-2017 05:28 PM)snowtiger Wrote:  It was part smartaleck. People here get upsetz over bad wins.

I like all wins. If they start putting *'s by the Ws and Ls, I might change my tune, though.

I view you as a wise individual, with that I don't believe you need his help in figuring out the game of basketball.

Thank you. I'm at work and sometimes post very fast in between dealing with the folks. 04-cheers
01-16-2017 05:34 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TubbyTime Offline
Banned

Posts: 1,321
Joined: Sep 2016
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #304
RE: GO TIGERS GO
(01-16-2017 05:34 PM)snowtiger Wrote:  
(01-16-2017 05:31 PM)TubbyTime Wrote:  
(01-16-2017 05:28 PM)snowtiger Wrote:  It was part smartaleck. People here get upsetz over bad wins.

I like all wins. If they start putting *'s by the Ws and Ls, I might change my tune, though.

I view you as a wise individual, with that I don't believe you need his help in figuring out the game of basketball.

Thank you. I'm at work and sometimes post very fast in between dealing with the folks. 04-cheers

"Dealing with the folks" I like that!
01-16-2017 05:36 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
snowtiger Offline
Hall of Flamers
*

Posts: 33,317
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation: 3707
I Root For: W's!!!
Location: Cascade Volcanic Arc
Post: #305
RE: GO TIGERS GO
(01-16-2017 05:34 PM)Penny Lane Wrote:  
(01-16-2017 05:28 PM)snowtiger Wrote:  It was part smartaleck. People here get upsetz over bad wins.

I like all wins, and it's true. The wins we we're supposed to lose do have a special flavor that's unbeatable (just to be perfectly clear).

If they start putting *'s by the Ws and Ls, I might change my tune, though.

The NCAA does. They are called good wins and bad losses. Part of criteria for making tournament.

lol
01-16-2017 05:36 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Penny Lane Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,702
Joined: Nov 2015
I Root For: Tigers &Tigers
Location: Next 40 Out
Post: #306
RE: GO TIGERS GO
(01-16-2017 05:36 PM)snowtiger Wrote:  
(01-16-2017 05:34 PM)Penny Lane Wrote:  
(01-16-2017 05:28 PM)snowtiger Wrote:  It was part smartaleck. People here get upsetz over bad wins.

I like all wins, and it's true. The wins we we're supposed to lose do have a special flavor that's unbeatable (just to be perfectly clear).

If they start putting *'s by the Ws and Ls, I might change my tune, though.

The NCAA does. They are called good wins and bad losses. Part of criteria for making tournament.

lol

Edited: you do post vey FAST. I'm confused as to what you know now.

If you think that is funny, you obviously don't have a clue on how at large teams are selected for tournament. Find it hard to believe that you are a serious fan and don't know that. You are in the 1% here. LAM.
(This post was last modified: 01-16-2017 05:45 PM by Penny Lane.)
01-16-2017 05:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
snowtiger Offline
Hall of Flamers
*

Posts: 33,317
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation: 3707
I Root For: W's!!!
Location: Cascade Volcanic Arc
Post: #307
RE: GO TIGERS GO
(01-16-2017 05:42 PM)Penny Lane Wrote:  
(01-16-2017 05:36 PM)snowtiger Wrote:  
(01-16-2017 05:34 PM)Penny Lane Wrote:  
(01-16-2017 05:28 PM)snowtiger Wrote:  It was part smartaleck. People here get upsetz over bad wins.

I like all wins, and it's true. The wins we we're supposed to lose do have a special flavor that's unbeatable (just to be perfectly clear).

If they start putting *'s by the Ws and Ls, I might change my tune, though.

The NCAA does. They are called good wins and bad losses. Part of criteria for making tournament.

lol

If you think that is funny, you obviously don't have a clue on how at large teams are selected for tournament. Find it hard to believe that you are a serious fan and don't know that. You are in the 1% here. LAM.

I think it's funny you telling me that. You just want a new sparring partner. lol
01-16-2017 05:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Penny Lane Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,702
Joined: Nov 2015
I Root For: Tigers &Tigers
Location: Next 40 Out
Post: #308
RE: GO TIGERS GO
(01-16-2017 05:44 PM)snowtiger Wrote:  
(01-16-2017 05:42 PM)Penny Lane Wrote:  
(01-16-2017 05:36 PM)snowtiger Wrote:  
(01-16-2017 05:34 PM)Penny Lane Wrote:  
(01-16-2017 05:28 PM)snowtiger Wrote:  It was part smartaleck. People here get upsetz over bad wins.

I like all wins, and it's true. The wins we we're supposed to lose do have a special flavor that's unbeatable (just to be perfectly clear).

If they start putting *'s by the Ws and Ls, I might change my tune, though.

The NCAA does. They are called good wins and bad losses. Part of criteria for making tournament.

lol

If you think that is funny, you obviously don't have a clue on how at large teams are selected for tournament. Find it hard to believe that you are a serious fan and don't know that. You are in the 1% here. LAM.

I think it's funny you telling me that. You just want a new sparring partner. lol

See above post. Last thing I need is another pack dog on me. Lol
01-16-2017 05:46 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
snowtiger Offline
Hall of Flamers
*

Posts: 33,317
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation: 3707
I Root For: W's!!!
Location: Cascade Volcanic Arc
Post: #309
RE: GO TIGERS GO
(01-16-2017 05:46 PM)Penny Lane Wrote:  
(01-16-2017 05:44 PM)snowtiger Wrote:  
(01-16-2017 05:42 PM)Penny Lane Wrote:  
(01-16-2017 05:36 PM)snowtiger Wrote:  
(01-16-2017 05:34 PM)Penny Lane Wrote:  The NCAA does. They are called good wins and bad losses. Part of criteria for making tournament.

lol

If you think that is funny, you obviously don't have a clue on how at large teams are selected for tournament. Find it hard to believe that you are a serious fan and don't know that. You are in the 1% here. LAM.

I think it's funny you telling me that. You just want a new sparring partner. lol

See above post. Last thing I need is another pack dog on me. Lol

lol I don't think anyone has ever accused me (in recent history) of running with a pack except Bluto. I know you are not he. Mostly I got chased by the pack, which is why I watch you provoke them because it's interesting.
(This post was last modified: 01-16-2017 05:53 PM by snowtiger.)
01-16-2017 05:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
tiger1016 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,080
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 445
I Root For: Memphis Tigers
Location: Memphis, TN
Post: #310
GO TIGERS GO
(01-16-2017 05:15 PM)Penny Lane Wrote:  
(01-16-2017 04:46 PM)Penny Lane Wrote:  
(01-16-2017 03:19 PM)tiger1016 Wrote:  
(01-16-2017 02:42 PM)Penny Lane Wrote:  
(01-16-2017 02:09 PM)tiger1016 Wrote:  To be fair you did say we lost to the teams we were underdogs to....and we weren't favored against Iowa. I read your post the same way.

His post is a lie. I did not say we were favored over Iowa.

Then you make same assumptions that aren't there. I said "Until tonight, we have beaten everyone we should have and lost to those we were underdogs to." In my very strong opinion, we should have beaten Iowa a lot worse than we did.

I know a lot about Iowa, seen almost every game until ours and knew unless we stunk it up we would win convincingly. Should have; had big lead and didn't play much D or double Jok as anyone in their right mind would have that game. Iowa has improved considerably since then but when they hit the road in the B10 it will be tough going.

Well it's hard for anyone reading that post not to assume you were leaving out Iowa for example as a team we weren't favored against. We didn't know your opinion as it wasn't expressed in that post. You made a statement, the second part of which at face value is incorrect IMO.

It's cool though. Let's hope Tigers can win at Houston on Wed and gives us something good to talk about.

That's not the point. Where in the post is Iowa even mentioned? My post says "lost to those we were underdogs to"; we did not lose to Iowa. Why would you assume it was Iowa I was referring to? We did not lose to them. You can make assumptions all day long but that doesn't make them true.

He posted I explicitly stated "we were favored over Iowa" and when asked for a post to prove it, he quoted my post 188 which, as I said, in no shape or form has me saying we were favored over Iowa. Also, you are ignoring an even more obvious lie on his part: he has posted evidence in post 188 directly contradictory to his statement regarding Oklahoma.

I'm tired of being the whipping boy of the site and when someone blatantly and willfully lies about what I posted, I'm going to correct the record.

I agree about Houston. We need a signature win. They have a small point guard much better than the kid from Monmouth that torched us. They shoot the 3 well which makes it difficult to zone them.

Good points. I see how the latter part of that sentence can be misconstrued. It seemed as if you were saying we lost to everyone that we weren't favored against...just a matter of comprehension. On re-reading I see what you meant to say.

Houston scares me man. That little fella from Monmouth sliced and diced us. Hopefully we have a better defensive strategy this time around.
01-16-2017 05:56 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Penny Lane Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,702
Joined: Nov 2015
I Root For: Tigers &Tigers
Location: Next 40 Out
Post: #311
RE: GO TIGERS GO
(01-16-2017 05:50 PM)snowtiger Wrote:  
(01-16-2017 05:46 PM)Penny Lane Wrote:  
(01-16-2017 05:44 PM)snowtiger Wrote:  
(01-16-2017 05:42 PM)Penny Lane Wrote:  
(01-16-2017 05:36 PM)snowtiger Wrote:  lol

If you think that is funny, you obviously don't have a clue on how at large teams are selected for tournament. Find it hard to believe that you are a serious fan and don't know that. You are in the 1% here. LAM.

I think it's funny you telling me that. You just want a new sparring partner. lol

See above post. Last thing I need is another pack dog on me. Lol

lol I don't think anyone has ever accused me (in recent history) of running with a pack except Bluto. I know you are not he. Mostly I got chased by the pack, which is why I watch you provoke them because it's interesting.

If facts and strong opinions they don't agree with provoke them so be it.
01-16-2017 05:56 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Penny Lane Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,702
Joined: Nov 2015
I Root For: Tigers &Tigers
Location: Next 40 Out
Post: #312
RE: GO TIGERS GO
(01-16-2017 05:56 PM)tiger1016 Wrote:  
(01-16-2017 05:15 PM)Penny Lane Wrote:  
(01-16-2017 04:46 PM)Penny Lane Wrote:  
(01-16-2017 03:19 PM)tiger1016 Wrote:  
(01-16-2017 02:42 PM)Penny Lane Wrote:  His post is a lie. I did not say we were favored over Iowa.

Then you make same assumptions that aren't there. I said "Until tonight, we have beaten everyone we should have and lost to those we were underdogs to." In my very strong opinion, we should have beaten Iowa a lot worse than we did.

I know a lot about Iowa, seen almost every game until ours and knew unless we stunk it up we would win convincingly. Should have; had big lead and didn't play much D or double Jok as anyone in their right mind would have that game. Iowa has improved considerably since then but when they hit the road in the B10 it will be tough going.

Well it's hard for anyone reading that post not to assume you were leaving out Iowa for example as a team we weren't favored against. We didn't know your opinion as it wasn't expressed in that post. You made a statement, the second part of which at face value is incorrect IMO.

It's cool though. Let's hope Tigers can win at Houston on Wed and gives us something good to talk about.

That's not the point. Where in the post is Iowa even mentioned? My post says "lost to those we were underdogs to"; we did not lose to Iowa. Why would you assume it was Iowa I was referring to? We did not lose to them. You can make assumptions all day long but that doesn't make them true.

He posted I explicitly stated "we were favored over Iowa" and when asked for a post to prove it, he quoted my post 188 which, as I said, in no shape or form has me saying we were favored over Iowa. Also, you are ignoring an even more obvious lie on his part: he has posted evidence in post 188 directly contradictory to his statement regarding Oklahoma.

I'm tired of being the whipping boy of the site and when someone blatantly and willfully lies about what I posted, I'm going to correct the record.

I agree about Houston. We need a signature win. They have a small point guard much better than the kid from Monmouth that torched us. They shoot the 3 well which makes it difficult to zone them.

Good points. I see how the latter part of that sentence can be misconstrued. It seemed as if you were saying we lost to everyone that we weren't favored against...just a matter of comprehension. On re-reading I see what you meant to say.

Houston scares me man. That little fella from Monmouth sliced and diced us. Hopefully we have a better defensive strategy this time around.

He scares me to. Houston is good. One of best teams we have played so far (think SC WITH Thornwell would have been). Thought zone, then immediately 3pt shots being drilled with our sagging off shooters and said no way. Tough matchup.
01-16-2017 06:03 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.
MemphisTigers.org is the number one message board for Memphis Tigers sports.