(01-11-2017 09:55 PM)Fox Wrote:  

(01-07-2017 09:48 AM)KNIGHTTIME Wrote:  Most of the G4 need to go FCS. That would make the college game better.

EXCUSE THIS INTERUPTION :

USER TIGER SMOKE IS STILL ON THE BOARD AND HASN'T BEEN BANNED.

HE IS AN INTEGRATED TROLL WHO GOES BY BIG EAST HOMER, ACC FOR LIFE, AMONG OTHER USERNAMES.

HE OFTEN RATES HIMSELF HIGHLY AMONGST THESE USERNAMES (LOOK AT HIS PROFILE FOR PROOF).

HIS FOOTBALL KNOWLEDGE IS VERY POOR AS WELL, WHICH LARGELY INDICATES A CHILDISH TROLL.

PLEASE BE CAREFUL WHEN ENCOUNTERING THIS VISCIOUS USER AND OTHER USERNAMES ASSOCIATED WITH HIS ACCOUNT

Doesn't the B1G have a board for you to play in and root for a team that shouldn't have been in the playoffs as a non conference champion?

We need to remove the ESPiN link from the"Important Threads" section of this board.

That section, although labeled "American", it really is not about The American.

Most of the times the information there has nothing to do with The American, it just another platform for ESPiN to spread its propaganda about the Pompasz 5.

http://www.enidnews.com/sports/local_spo...d7628.html

More support showing that a second playoff for the Gritty 5 is just more ESPiN propaganda.

http://www.cbssports.com/college-footbal...yoff-idea/

Interesting read regarding separate G5 Championship... The Antitrust word was brought up... I mentioned earlier in this thread that the idea was pushed by ESPiN to bait G5 into separation without the Pompasz 5 or ESPiN being liable.

My opinion aside, it's an interesting read.

Interesting read.
Everyone should remember that ESPN was not alone in the conflict of interest and driving down the value of the Big East / American contract value. CBSSports "news" division did a lot of breathless reporting about stability and value while the network side was in contract process (I'm looking at you, Dodd).
So here is CBS fluffing their partner SEC, and telling the G4s (yes, G4s, I see Sankey's name-check if Aresco as acknowledgement or buy in for P6 campaign) to know their place or they won't get any more OOC game paychecks.

Sent from my XT1526 using CSNbbs mobile app

(01-13-2017 04:52 PM)slhNavy91 Wrote:  Interesting read.
Everyone should remember that ESPN was not alone in the conflict of interest and driving down the value of the Big East / American contract value. CBSSports "news" division did a lot of breathless reporting about stability and value while the network side was in contract process (I'm looking at you, Dodd).
So here is CBS fluffing their partner SEC, and telling the G4s (yes, G4s, I see Sankey's name-check if Aresco as acknowledgement or buy in for P6 campaign) to know their place or they won't get any more OOC game paychecks.

Sent from my XT1526 using CSNbbs mobile app

This is starting to get very interesting as more people start to chime in on this subject matter... Wonder if the AAC got spared from B12 Expansion only because it was too early.

Saving the raids in a coordinated effort at time of contract renewal as was the case between ESPiN and the Atlantic Coast Conference in both raids against the BIG EAST.

The last one forcing the SEC & the B1G to react and expand to 14 just to keep up.

If the AAC gets raided again at contract renewal time I would think that at that point it would be a good time for legal actions against the Pompasz 5 and ESPiN.

The quicker all of us come to grips that we are in the high priced bling bling version of FCS, the better.

Its already a different game that's being played.

(01-14-2017 12:36 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  The quicker all of us come to grips that we are in the high priced bling bling version of FCS, the better.

Its already a different game that's being played.

You may be FCS, but everyone else in the so called FBS is trying to make sure that everyone at that level plays on a level playing field.

(01-10-2017 11:51 PM)BEAST Football Wrote:  The best scenario may be to expand to 10 team playoff and have each CHAMPION of the 10 CFP Conferences he represented in the playoff. no Pretenders and no Group Designation by ESPiN!

Absolutely ridiculous to give the g4 each an invite. At best is getting 1 shared invite.

I say go 8....get the P6 each an invite and 1 from g4 if ranked inside top 20 and 1 at large.

(01-17-2017 06:45 AM)KNIGHTTIME Wrote:  

(01-10-2017 11:51 PM)BEAST Football Wrote:  The best scenario may be to expand to 10 team playoff and have each CHAMPION of the 10 CFP Conferences he represented in the playoff. no Pretenders and no Group Designation by ESPiN!

Absolutely ridiculous to give the g4 each an invite. At best is getting 1 shared invite.

I say go 8....get the P6 each an invite and 1 from g4 if ranked inside top 20 and 1 at large.

I think the G4 should host their own playoff. If a team wins it 2 years in a row, they are eligible for a CFP spot if they go undefeated in the 3rd. That is unless Notre Dame needs their spot.

(01-14-2017 12:36 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  The quicker all of us come to grips that we are in the high priced bling bling version of FCS, the better.

Its already a different game that's being played.

Yup.

(01-17-2017 08:37 AM)BearcatJerry Wrote:  

(01-14-2017 12:36 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  The quicker all of us come to grips that we are in the high priced bling bling version of FCS, the better.

Its already a different game that's being played.

Yup.

Again, speak for your team. I didn't think they belonged in the BIG EAST but the basketball 7 needed to be HAPPY, personally I thing you should convince your AD to move to"The Valley"