http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/afp/art...eting.html

Quote:US technology giant IBM said Tuesday it would hire 25,000 people in the country over the next four years, a day before President-elect Donald Trump meets with tech industry leaders.

About 6,000 of those hirings will occur in 2017, IBM chief executive Ginni Rometty said in an opinion article published in the newspaper USA Today.

IBM, which has undertaken in recent years a restructuring of its activities, will invest $1 billion on employee training and development in the next four years, said the IBM president, chairman and CEO.

Like I said lower corporate tax rate and lessen regulations white collar stay come back also.

Heard this on the radio while still working...

Da-derp.

should we start a list of WINNING?!?

Carrier
Ford
Some jap bank
IBM
Next?

This must be making the Libs heads explode.

Can we get a week off from winning? I'm getting tired.

(12-14-2016 06:46 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  This must be making the Libs heads explode.

The narrative will be that they could have done this before the election, which could have helped Hillary, but the company is anti-woman.

(12-14-2016 08:22 AM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  

(12-14-2016 06:46 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  This must be making the Libs heads explode.

The narrative will be that they could have done this before the election, which could have helped Hillary, but the company is anti-woman.

How many women CEOs do they have?

(12-14-2016 08:38 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(12-14-2016 08:22 AM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  

(12-14-2016 06:46 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  This must be making the Libs heads explode.

The narrative will be that they could have done this before the election, which could have helped Hillary, but the company is anti-woman.

How many women CEOs do they have?

Well you can only have one CEO, so they are hitting 100%.

I'll believe it when I pick up the phone and call them from my office and don't get an Indian accent claiming his name is "chuck" and then getting the email confirmation with names like Virjay or such.

(12-14-2016 08:22 AM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  

(12-14-2016 06:46 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  This must be making the Libs heads explode.

The narrative will be that they could have done this before the election, which could have helped Hillary, but the company is anti-woman.

That or Putin made them do it

Face it, the corporate world has been very reluctant to do any domestic expansion activities over the last 8 years because of the uncertainty of what the Obama regime was wanting to do to them be it increased domestic taxes, more regulatory red tape, and on and on. They absolutely knew that the Democratic left was demonizing them threatening to make them less profitable as a matter of policy in a attempt to feed the money pit that is Washington.

Now, for the first time in a long time - they are "hopeful" that there is someone that wants to make it easier for them to be successful and make money (the reason for their existence). The Obama's, Hillary's, Warren's and Sander's of the Democratic party publicly tell them that they should give up profitability in the name of "feeding the benevolent political beast" - and duping their followers that they are Robin Hood. Mostly, they just enrich themselves........

(12-14-2016 06:46 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  This must be making the Libs heads explode.

They are probably still to busy looking for their magic wand.

(12-14-2016 09:24 AM)Crebman Wrote:  Face it, the corporate world has been very reluctant to do any domestic expansion activities over the last 8 years because of the uncertainty of what the Obama regime was wanting to do to them be it increased domestic taxes, more regulatory red tape, and on and on. They absolutely knew that the Democratic left was demonizing them threatening to make them less profitable as a matter of policy in a attempt to feed the money pit that is Washington.

Now, for the first time in a long time - they are "hopeful" that there is someone that wants to make it easier for them to be successful and make money (the reason for their existence). The Obama's, Hillary's, Warren's and Sander's of the Democratic party publicly tell them that they should give up profitability in the name of "feeding the benevolent political beast" - and duping their followers that they are Robin Hood. Mostly, they just enrich themselves........

Pretty simple but libs just don't get it.

(12-14-2016 09:51 PM)DFWMINER Wrote:  

(12-14-2016 09:24 AM)Crebman Wrote:  Face it, the corporate world has been very reluctant to do any domestic expansion activities over the last 8 years because of the uncertainty of what the Obama regime was wanting to do to them be it increased domestic taxes, more regulatory red tape, and on and on. They absolutely knew that the Democratic left was demonizing them threatening to make them less profitable as a matter of policy in a attempt to feed the money pit that is Washington.
Now, for the first time in a long time - they are "hopeful" that there is someone that wants to make it easier for them to be successful and make money (the reason for their existence). The Obama's, Hillary's, Warren's and Sander's of the Democratic party publicly tell them that they should give up profitability in the name of "feeding the benevolent political beast" - and duping their followers that they are Robin Hood. Mostly, they just enrich themselves........

Pretty simple but libs just don't get it.

Bingo.