(10-01-2016 04:27 AM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  as for UH...you SHOULD be way out in front in ratings/viewers

You started the year ranked and have had at least three nationally televised games already (OU, UC, and UCONN)

True

(10-01-2016 06:41 AM)rosewater Wrote:  

(10-01-2016 05:49 AM)vcoog Wrote:  I saw where the Uconn/UH game had like 3x as many viewers as the Tech/Kansas game, yet the b12 will cash in 10x as much cash as any of our teams.

Maybe UH will get everyone a raise if we make the playoffs. Or maybe we will leave. Have no clue which is more likely, honestly, probably neither.

Get over yourself. You are one coach away from 2014. Enjoy the moment, but please.

Dude, vcoog is right... Everyone in the AAC should be pulling $$$ for Houston... And about been one coach away, we'll simply hire another great coach just as we always do. Hehe

(10-01-2016 10:23 AM)BigHouston Wrote:  

(10-01-2016 06:41 AM)rosewater Wrote:  

(10-01-2016 05:49 AM)vcoog Wrote:  I saw where the Uconn/UH game had like 3x as many viewers as the Tech/Kansas game, yet the b12 will cash in 10x as much cash as any of our teams.

Maybe UH will get everyone a raise if we make the playoffs. Or maybe we will leave. Have no clue which is more likely, honestly, probably neither.

Get over yourself. You are one coach away from 2014. Enjoy the moment, but please.

Dude, vcoog is right... Everyone in the AAC should be pulling $$$ for Houston... And about been one coach away, we'll simply hire another great coach just as we always do. Hehe

Agreed. When Kevin Sumlin left, Houston made an excellent hire and just kept on rolling...

(10-01-2016 04:27 AM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  as for UH...you SHOULD be way out in front in ratings/viewers

You started the year ranked and have had at least three nationally televised games already (OU, UC, and UCONN)

So all UC needs to do is get ranked and the Bearcats could be on national tv as well. Good luck cuz the Bearcats suck butt.

(10-01-2016 10:46 AM)Tech Savy Wrote:  

(10-01-2016 10:23 AM)BigHouston Wrote:  

(10-01-2016 06:41 AM)rosewater Wrote:  

(10-01-2016 05:49 AM)vcoog Wrote:  I saw where the Uconn/UH game had like 3x as many viewers as the Tech/Kansas game, yet the b12 will cash in 10x as much cash as any of our teams.

Maybe UH will get everyone a raise if we make the playoffs. Or maybe we will leave. Have no clue which is more likely, honestly, probably neither.

Get over yourself. You are one coach away from 2014. Enjoy the moment, but please.

Dude, vcoog is right... Everyone in the AAC should be pulling $$$ for Houston... And about been one coach away, we'll simply hire another great coach just as we always do. Hehe

Agreed. When Kevin Sumlin left, Houston made an excellent hire and just kept on rolling...

Technically levine was promoted not hired. So yes we did make a great hire.

(10-01-2016 10:23 AM)BigHouston Wrote:  

(10-01-2016 06:41 AM)rosewater Wrote:  

(10-01-2016 05:49 AM)vcoog Wrote:  I saw where the Uconn/UH game had like 3x as many viewers as the Tech/Kansas game, yet the b12 will cash in 10x as much cash as any of our teams.

Maybe UH will get everyone a raise if we make the playoffs. Or maybe we will leave. Have no clue which is more likely, honestly, probably neither.

Get over yourself. You are one coach away from 2014. Enjoy the moment, but please.

Dude, vcoog is right... Everyone in the AAC should be pulling $$$ for Houston... And about been one coach away, we'll simply hire another great coach just as we always do. Hehe

I do pull for Houston to win, like I am pulling for Memphis today. Not getting the part about always hiring a great coach. Levine class class. Anyway, you have a great unprededented season going so do not think that this is the norm for you.

(10-01-2016 12:36 PM)rosewater Wrote:  

(10-01-2016 10:23 AM)BigHouston Wrote:  

(10-01-2016 06:41 AM)rosewater Wrote:  

(10-01-2016 05:49 AM)vcoog Wrote:  I saw where the Uconn/UH game had like 3x as many viewers as the Tech/Kansas game, yet the b12 will cash in 10x as much cash as any of our teams.

Maybe UH will get everyone a raise if we make the playoffs. Or maybe we will leave. Have no clue which is more likely, honestly, probably neither.

Get over yourself. You are one coach away from 2014. Enjoy the moment, but please.

Dude, vcoog is right... Everyone in the AAC should be pulling $$$ for Houston... And about been one coach away, we'll simply hire another great coach just as we always do. Hehe

I do pull for Houston to win, like I am pulling for Memphis today. Not getting the part about always hiring a great coach. Levine class class. Anyway, you have a great unprededented season going so do not think that this is the norm for you.

I see where you're coming from, no this isn't the norm and no UH fan would think us being in the top ten is gonna happen every year. My point is still valid that the AAC can use it as leverage for renegotiating the TV deal though, sorry if it came off wrong, my point is how under funded we are.

(10-01-2016 01:56 AM)TeleCoog Wrote:  for individual teams these things ebb and flow. a couple years ago it was UCF doing the league's heavy lifting. now it's Houston's turn. it should be viewed like a farming coop. some's yields are down, some are up.

^^^^^^^THIS^^^^^^

That's why big budgets and the deep list of young successful innovative coaches is so important for the AAC. There is a reason we entered the week with every team at .500 or above. There will always a team on a roll in the AAC. Won't be the same one every year---but there will always be a team enjoying a great season (likely several---just like last year). That IS going to be the "norm",

(10-01-2016 01:05 PM)vcoog Wrote:  

(10-01-2016 12:36 PM)rosewater Wrote:  

(10-01-2016 10:23 AM)BigHouston Wrote:  

(10-01-2016 06:41 AM)rosewater Wrote:  

(10-01-2016 05:49 AM)vcoog Wrote:  I saw where the Uconn/UH game had like 3x as many viewers as the Tech/Kansas game, yet the b12 will cash in 10x as much cash as any of our teams.

Maybe UH will get everyone a raise if we make the playoffs. Or maybe we will leave. Have no clue which is more likely, honestly, probably neither.

Get over yourself. You are one coach away from 2014. Enjoy the moment, but please.

Dude, vcoog is right... Everyone in the AAC should be pulling $$$ for Houston... And about been one coach away, we'll simply hire another great coach just as we always do. Hehe

I do pull for Houston to win, like I am pulling for Memphis today. Not getting the part about always hiring a great coach. Levine class class. Anyway, you have a great unprededented season going so do not think that this is the norm for you.

I see where you're coming from, no this isn't the norm and no UH fan would think us being in the top ten is gonna happen every year. My point is still valid that the AAC can use it as leverage for renegotiating the TV deal though, sorry if it came off wrong, my point is how under funded we are.

We are in agreement. Vcoog on the other hand is getting a little too big for his britches.

(10-01-2016 03:15 PM)rosewater Wrote:  

(10-01-2016 01:05 PM)vcoog Wrote:  

(10-01-2016 12:36 PM)rosewater Wrote:  

(10-01-2016 10:23 AM)BigHouston Wrote:  

(10-01-2016 06:41 AM)rosewater Wrote:  Get over yourself. You are one coach away from 2014. Enjoy the moment, but please.

Dude, vcoog is right... Everyone in the AAC should be pulling $$$ for Houston... And about been one coach away, we'll simply hire another great coach just as we always do. Hehe

I do pull for Houston to win, like I am pulling for Memphis today. Not getting the part about always hiring a great coach. Levine class class. Anyway, you have a great unprededented season going so do not think that this is the norm for you.

I see where you're coming from, no this isn't the norm and no UH fan would think us being in the top ten is gonna happen every year. My point is still valid that the AAC can use it as leverage for renegotiating the TV deal though, sorry if it came off wrong, my point is how under funded we are.

We are in agreement. Vcoog on the other hand is getting a little too big for his britches.

This is Vcoog. We are no longer in agreement.

Useless post.

Do another analysis that takes into consideration the following:

1. Channel
2. Opponent
3. Time slot
4. Lead in

(10-01-2016 04:15 PM)cmhatter Wrote:  Useless post.

Do another analysis that takes into consideration the following:

1. Channel
2. Opponent
3. Time slot
4. Lead in

Useless?

The better teams get the better channels. The better time slots.

To the victor goes the spoils.

The more viewers, the bigger your brand becomes. Pure and simple.