(09-28-2016 07:16 AM)fanhood Wrote:  If Houston gets past Navy on the road, they have a very clear path to being 10-0 going into the last two games.

I predict the Cougars will win a close game at Navy, but will pull away in the 4th qtr, much like they did at Nippert.

In regards to the games vs Louisville and @ Memphis, I think they split them.

Thoughts?

I see them going undefeated until they face ECU in the championship game. Tdecu will be going nuts

Other AAC fans are defending Tulsa? I can die happy now. *sheds one tear for joy, and one tear for Harambe*

Don't sleep on UConn you saw what happened last year

Sent from my LG-D851 using CSNbbs mobile app

(09-28-2016 05:10 PM)UConn to the Beast Wrote:  Don't sleep on UConn you saw what happened last year

Sent from my LG-D851 using CSNbbs mobile app

I have not watched UCONN play this year.

Serious question....can they keep up with Houston's speed on defense?

(09-28-2016 08:07 PM)fanhood Wrote:  

(09-28-2016 05:10 PM)UConn to the Beast Wrote:  Don't sleep on UConn you saw what happened last year

Sent from my LG-D851 using CSNbbs mobile app

I have not watched UCONN play this year.

Serious question....can they keep up with Houston's speed on defense?

They couldn't keep up with Maine's speed on defense. Houston will violate the Geneva convention on Uconn

(09-28-2016 08:46 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(09-28-2016 08:07 PM)fanhood Wrote:  

(09-28-2016 05:10 PM)UConn to the Beast Wrote:  Don't sleep on UConn you saw what happened last year

Sent from my LG-D851 using CSNbbs mobile app

I have not watched UCONN play this year.

Serious question....can they keep up with Houston's speed on defense?

They couldn't keep up with Maine's speed on defense. Houston will violate the Geneva convention on Uconn

You stink of jealousy. Uconn should have beatin navy

Sent from my LG-D851 using CSNbbs mobile app

(09-28-2016 08:54 PM)UConn to the Beast Wrote:  

(09-28-2016 08:46 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(09-28-2016 08:07 PM)fanhood Wrote:  

(09-28-2016 05:10 PM)UConn to the Beast Wrote:  Don't sleep on UConn you saw what happened last year

Sent from my LG-D851 using CSNbbs mobile app

I have not watched UCONN play this year.

Serious question....can they keep up with Houston's speed on defense?

They couldn't keep up with Maine's speed on defense. Houston will violate the Geneva convention on Uconn

You stink of jealousy. Uconn should have beatin navy

Sent from my LG-D851 using CSNbbs mobile app

Navy's inexperience = failed to step on UConn's throat. Getting dominated 21-0 in the first 25 minutes isn't "should have beaten"

Sent from my XT1526 using CSNbbs mobile app

There is nothing easy about chasing perfection.

(09-28-2016 09:08 PM)Mr Hyde Wrote:  Why is the Pesik girl always so negative? She seems to always be obsessing over Tulsa.

first off im not a girl

secondly, from your post history you are a tulsa fan....can you read??? i was clearly saying tulsa could win the MWC..that fresno got up by luck and tulsa dominated them when they settled, that tulsa was the dramatically better team

i rarely , and i mean rarely ever talk about tulsa...nor am i negative...

go through my post history i talk about everyother team more than i talk about tulsa, i dont care about tthem at all..all becuase your blind homerism only notices when i talk about them doesnt mean i care or obsess over tulsa ...unwind your panties and stop being so defensive and actually read

(09-28-2016 07:31 AM)fanhood Wrote:  

(09-28-2016 07:25 AM)CougarRed Wrote:  Houston's opponents are a cumulative 18-11. Navy at 19-12. By far the hardest of any remaining undefeated G5 team. Compare:

San Diego St at 7-25
Boise at 8-22
Toledo at 12-20
Air Force 11-19
W Mich at 13-13
Memphis at 15-14

My thought? It is light years easier for Boise, AF, SDSU or Toledo to go undefeated than Houston (or Navy).

You are probably right. With that, back to the topic, Houston seems to have a clear path to being 10-0 if they can get by Navy.

Tulsa, SMU, UCF, and Tulane have all been very bad in recent history. the Cougars seem to have a relatively easy schedule in October.

Even in our worst year UCF went toe-to-toe with Houston for a half last year. USF/Navy/UCF are going to give them trouble

(09-28-2016 09:45 PM)bignow Wrote:  

(09-28-2016 07:31 AM)fanhood Wrote:  

(09-28-2016 07:25 AM)CougarRed Wrote:  Houston's opponents are a cumulative 18-11. Navy at 19-12. By far the hardest of any remaining undefeated G5 team. Compare:

San Diego St at 7-25
Boise at 8-22
Toledo at 12-20
Air Force 11-19
W Mich at 13-13
Memphis at 15-14

My thought? It is light years easier for Boise, AF, SDSU or Toledo to go undefeated than Houston (or Navy).

You are probably right. With that, back to the topic, Houston seems to have a clear path to being 10-0 if they can get by Navy.

Tulsa, SMU, UCF, and Tulane have all been very bad in recent history. the Cougars seem to have a relatively easy schedule in October.

Even in our worst year UCF went toe-to-toe with Houston for a half last year. USF/Navy/UCF are going to give them trouble

ESPNN 1 2 3 4 T
Houston 7 17 28 7 59
UCF 7 3 0 0 10

Hung with us for a half?

(09-28-2016 09:35 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(09-28-2016 09:08 PM)Mr Hyde Wrote:  Why is the Pesik girl always so negative? She seems to always be obsessing over Tulsa.

first off im not a girl

secondly, from your post history you are a tulsa fan....can you read??? i was clearly saying tulsa could win the MWC..that fresno got up by luck and tulsa dominated them when they settled, that tulsa was the dramatically better team

i rarely , and i mean rarely ever talk about tulsa...nor am i negative...

go through my post history i talk about everyother team more than i talk about tulsa, i dont care about tthem at all..all becuase your blind homerism only notices when i talk about them doesnt mean i care or obsess over tulsa ...unwind your panties and stop being so defensive and actually read

Your lack of capitalization indicates you are a 14 year old girl. I agree with Mr. Hyde.

Tulsa upsets Coog High and beats UC 100-7 in the last game of the season.

mark it.

(09-28-2016 10:27 PM)fanhood Wrote:  

(09-28-2016 09:35 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(09-28-2016 09:08 PM)Mr Hyde Wrote:  Why is the Pesik girl always so negative? She seems to always be obsessing over Tulsa.

first off im not a girl

secondly, from your post history you are a tulsa fan....can you read??? i was clearly saying tulsa could win the MWC..that fresno got up by luck and tulsa dominated them when they settled, that tulsa was the dramatically better team

i rarely , and i mean rarely ever talk about tulsa...nor am i negative...

go through my post history i talk about everyother team more than i talk about tulsa, i dont care about tthem at all..all becuase your blind homerism only notices when i talk about them doesnt mean i care or obsess over tulsa ...unwind your panties and stop being so defensive and actually read

Your lack of capitalization indicates you are a 14 year old girl. I agree with Mr. Hyde.

child like insults..thoroughly impressed



all we are missing is a cooties insult...

(09-28-2016 10:35 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(09-28-2016 10:27 PM)fanhood Wrote:  

(09-28-2016 09:35 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(09-28-2016 09:08 PM)Mr Hyde Wrote:  Why is the Pesik girl always so negative? She seems to always be obsessing over Tulsa.

first off im not a girl

secondly, from your post history you are a tulsa fan....can you read??? i was clearly saying tulsa could win the MWC..that fresno got up by luck and tulsa dominated them when they settled, that tulsa was the dramatically better team

i rarely , and i mean rarely ever talk about tulsa...nor am i negative...

go through my post history i talk about everyother team more than i talk about tulsa, i dont care about tthem at all..all becuase your blind homerism only notices when i talk about them doesnt mean i care or obsess over tulsa ...unwind your panties and stop being so defensive and actually read

Your lack of capitalization indicates you are a 14 year old girl. I agree with Mr. Hyde.

child like insults..thoroughly impressed



all we are missing is a cooties insult...

I will get out my red pen and start editing your papers Shannon. That is after all, what we adults are here for.

(09-28-2016 10:33 PM)Mr Hyde Wrote:  

(09-28-2016 09:35 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(09-28-2016 09:08 PM)Mr Hyde Wrote:  Why is the Pesik girl always so negative? She seems to always be obsessing over Tulsa.

first off im not a girl

secondly, from your post history you are a tulsa fan....can you read??? i was clearly saying tulsa could win the MWC..that fresno got up by luck and tulsa dominated them when they settled, that tulsa was the dramatically better team

i rarely , and i mean rarely ever talk about tulsa...nor am i negative...

go through my post history i talk about everyother team more than i talk about tulsa, i dont care about tthem at all..all becuase your blind homerism only notices when i talk about them doesnt mean i care or obsess over tulsa ...unwind your panties and stop being so defensive and actually read

Oh Pesik, you don't tell me what to do. I'm not interested in or intimidated by your post history. I was here before you got here and will still be here long after you're gone.

i was joking about your reading comprehension before but now im completely serious and think you have no reading comprehension

when did i tell you to do anything????.. i jokingly asked if you could read..that isnt an instruction

the part about my post history was clearly a reference point so you could see what i post about, it had nothing to do with some bragging point that i posted more, which you turned it into

so a recap:
sdsu fan makes thread insinating tulsa is trash and a easy win for houston

i post that he is dramatically underestimating tulsa, that tulsa could win the MWC this year

you a tulsa fan responds to me (not the sdsu fan) that i'm an obsessed girl who is talking negative about tulsa

i responded saying, did you actually read the post i was praising tulsa

your response was "dont tell me what to do"....

im getting a senile old man vibe from you

(09-28-2016 10:45 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(09-28-2016 10:33 PM)Mr Hyde Wrote:  

(09-28-2016 09:35 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(09-28-2016 09:08 PM)Mr Hyde Wrote:  Why is the Pesik girl always so negative? She seems to always be obsessing over Tulsa.

first off im not a girl

secondly, from your post history you are a tulsa fan....can you read??? i was clearly saying tulsa could win the MWC..that fresno got up by luck and tulsa dominated them when they settled, that tulsa was the dramatically better team

i rarely , and i mean rarely ever talk about tulsa...nor am i negative...

go through my post history i talk about everyother team more than i talk about tulsa, i dont care about tthem at all..all becuase your blind homerism only notices when i talk about them doesnt mean i care or obsess over tulsa ...unwind your panties and stop being so defensive and actually read

Oh Pesik, you don't tell me what to do. I'm not interested in or intimidated by your post history. I was here before you got here and will still be here long after you're gone.

i was joking about your reading comprehension before but now im completely serious and think you have no reading comprehension

when did i tell you to do anything????.. i jokingly asked if you could read..that isnt an instruction

the part about my post history was clearly a reference point so you could see what i post about, it had nothing to do with some bragging point that i posted more, which you turned it into

so a recap:
sdsu fan makes thread insinating tulsa is trash and a easy win for houston

i post that he is dramatically underestimating tulsa, that tulsa could win the MWC this year

you a tulsa fan responds to me (not the sdsu fan) that i'm an obsessed girl who is talking negative about tulsa

i responded saying, did you actually read the post i was praising tulsa

your response was "dont tell me what to do"....

im getting a senile old man vibe from you

After all that, Tulsa still would not have a chance at winning the MW, and you still have not capitalized a single letter.

(09-28-2016 10:56 PM)Mr Hyde Wrote:  Your Napoleon complex is showing. My job here is done.

you are drunk or generally not smart, that insult doesnt even make sense

if anything this showed your Napoleon complex.. do you know the definition of what that term is??

you thought i insulted tulsa, and immediately took to insult me
tulsa isnt perceived good but you think you are good (the Napoleon aspect), you attack anyone who you think is attacking the greatness of tulsa (the complex)

youve shown to be drunk, senile, not very smart, or need better reading glasses. your job here is done.

youve shown that you read before you respond ....

(09-28-2016 11:04 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(09-28-2016 10:56 PM)Mr Hyde Wrote:  Your Napoleon complex is showing. My job here is done.

your are drunk or generally not smart, that insult doesnt even make sense

if anything this showed your Napoleon complex.. do you know the definition of what that term is??

you thought i insulted tulsa, and immediately took to insult me
tulsa isnt perceived good but you think you are good (the Napoleon aspect), you attack anyone who you think is attacking the greatness of tulsa (the complex)

youve shown to be drunk, senile, not very smart, or need better reading glasses. your job here is done.

youve shown that you read before you respond ....

Are you a graduate of the University of Houston? If so, what class?

(09-28-2016 11:04 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(09-28-2016 10:56 PM)Mr Hyde Wrote:  Your Napoleon complex is showing. My job here is done.

your are drunk or generally not smart, that insult doesnt even make sense

if anything this showed your Napoleon complex.. do you know the definition of what that term is??

you thought i insulted tulsa, and immediately took to insult me
tulsa isnt perceived good but you think you are good (the Napoleon aspect), you attack anyone who you think is attacking the greatness of tulsa (the complex)

youve shown to be drunk, senile, not very smart, or need better reading glasses. your job here is done.

youve shown that you read before you respond ....

pssst, he's been baiting you the entire thread.. "I'M NOT A GIRL I SWEAR GUISE" Just chill out, next time you go to reply, just post the Too Long Didn't Read version and save everyone including you some time.