(06-26-2016 03:07 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  

(06-26-2016 07:37 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-25-2016 05:26 PM)tigersroll Wrote:  Ended Sting's career, albeit he was already semi-retired it seems.

Actually he didn't do anything to Sting. There was no "botch" there.

He gave Sting a turnbuckle powerbomb (as he does everyone) and Sting already had a degenerative spine condition and was not aware of it yet.

He was no longer able to withstand that kind of bump.

If you really believe the Wellness rules is about protecting performers instead of CYA on drug use. Then do you not think they would have had a pre employment medical examination which would have found any signs of a degenerative spine condition?

Punk quit because of their lack of concern about the health and well being of the performers. Had a staph infection and was forced to continue performing. Went on for some time until he went to outside doctor and got proper treatment.

So what does WWE do? They sue him claiming defamation.

Punk didnt quit because of a staph infection he quit because they told him they he wasnt going to main event Mania.

(06-26-2016 03:07 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  

(06-26-2016 07:37 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-25-2016 05:26 PM)tigersroll Wrote:  Ended Sting's career, albeit he was already semi-retired it seems.

Actually he didn't do anything to Sting. There was no "botch" there.

He gave Sting a turnbuckle powerbomb (as he does everyone) and Sting already had a degenerative spine condition and was not aware of it yet.

He was no longer able to withstand that kind of bump.

If you really believe the Wellness rules is about protecting performers instead of CYA on drug use. Then do you not think they would have had a pre employment medical examination which would have found any signs of a degenerative spine condition?

Punk quit because of their lack of concern about the health and well being of the performers. Had a staph infection and was forced to continue performing. Went on for some time until he went to outside doctor and got proper treatment.

So what does WWE do? They sue him claiming defamation.

In other words, I was correct that Rollins did not botch a move and injure Sting as was suggested earlier, so now you want to pivot and argue he should not have been in the ring anyway.

Thats fine with me, it just proves my point that much more.

(06-26-2016 10:18 PM)MemphisFan95 Wrote:  

(06-26-2016 03:07 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  

(06-26-2016 07:37 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-25-2016 05:26 PM)tigersroll Wrote:  Ended Sting's career, albeit he was already semi-retired it seems.

Actually he didn't do anything to Sting. There was no "botch" there.

He gave Sting a turnbuckle powerbomb (as he does everyone) and Sting already had a degenerative spine condition and was not aware of it yet.

He was no longer able to withstand that kind of bump.

If you really believe the Wellness rules is about protecting performers instead of CYA on drug use. Then do you not think they would have had a pre employment medical examination which would have found any signs of a degenerative spine condition?

Punk quit because of their lack of concern about the health and well being of the performers. Had a staph infection and was forced to continue performing. Went on for some time until he went to outside doctor and got proper treatment.

So what does WWE do? They sue him claiming defamation.

Punk didnt quit because of a staph infection he quit because they told him they he wasnt going to main event Mania.

Wasn't the losing the belt before Mania actually just the straw that broke the camel's back?

(06-26-2016 10:36 PM)Latilleon Wrote:  

(06-26-2016 10:18 PM)MemphisFan95 Wrote:  

(06-26-2016 03:07 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  

(06-26-2016 07:37 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-25-2016 05:26 PM)tigersroll Wrote:  Ended Sting's career, albeit he was already semi-retired it seems.

Actually he didn't do anything to Sting. There was no "botch" there.

He gave Sting a turnbuckle powerbomb (as he does everyone) and Sting already had a degenerative spine condition and was not aware of it yet.

He was no longer able to withstand that kind of bump.

If you really believe the Wellness rules is about protecting performers instead of CYA on drug use. Then do you not think they would have had a pre employment medical examination which would have found any signs of a degenerative spine condition?

Punk quit because of their lack of concern about the health and well being of the performers. Had a staph infection and was forced to continue performing. Went on for some time until he went to outside doctor and got proper treatment.

So what does WWE do? They sue him claiming defamation.

Punk didnt quit because of a staph infection he quit because they told him they he wasnt going to main event Mania.

Wasn't the losing the belt before Mania actually just the straw that broke the camel's back?

Yes he was under the impression he was headlining Mania as champion then the rock came back for Rock vs. Cena 2 and the put the belt on him and told Punk that he could co main event against HHH he walked out.

(06-26-2016 10:21 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-26-2016 03:07 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  

(06-26-2016 07:37 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-25-2016 05:26 PM)tigersroll Wrote:  Ended Sting's career, albeit he was already semi-retired it seems.

Actually he didn't do anything to Sting. There was no "botch" there.

He gave Sting a turnbuckle powerbomb (as he does everyone) and Sting already had a degenerative spine condition and was not aware of it yet.

He was no longer able to withstand that kind of bump.

If you really believe the Wellness rules is about protecting performers instead of CYA on drug use. Then do you not think they would have had a pre employment medical examination which would have found any signs of a degenerative spine condition?

Punk quit because of their lack of concern about the health and well being of the performers. Had a staph infection and was forced to continue performing. Went on for some time until he went to outside doctor and got proper treatment.

So what does WWE do? They sue him claiming defamation.

In other words, I was correct that Rollins did not botch a move and injure Sting as was suggested earlier, so now you want to pivot and argue he should not have been in the ring anyway.

Thats fine with me, it just proves my point that much more.

I think a reading comprehension class would be beneficial to you. That is not what i said what so ever. I stated that IF Sting had the preexisting condition as you claim that a pre-employment medical examination would have picked it up. And he would have never been allowed to enter the ring. You should really quit trying to twist things around in order to make them say what you want.

(06-26-2016 10:18 PM)MemphisFan95 Wrote:  

(06-26-2016 03:07 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  

(06-26-2016 07:37 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-25-2016 05:26 PM)tigersroll Wrote:  Ended Sting's career, albeit he was already semi-retired it seems.

Actually he didn't do anything to Sting. There was no "botch" there.

He gave Sting a turnbuckle powerbomb (as he does everyone) and Sting already had a degenerative spine condition and was not aware of it yet.

He was no longer able to withstand that kind of bump.

If you really believe the Wellness rules is about protecting performers instead of CYA on drug use. Then do you not think they would have had a pre employment medical examination which would have found any signs of a degenerative spine condition?

Punk quit because of their lack of concern about the health and well being of the performers. Had a staph infection and was forced to continue performing. Went on for some time until he went to outside doctor and got proper treatment.

So what does WWE do? They sue him claiming defamation.

Punk didnt quit because of a staph infection he quit because they told him they he wasnt going to main event Mania.

And i guess Kane also took time off from ring activity because he was not going to main event. The WWE had a, pardon the pun, rash of staph infections that made it's way through the locker room.

(06-27-2016 03:06 AM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  

(06-26-2016 10:21 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  In other words, I was correct that Rollins did not botch a move and injure Sting as was suggested earlier, so now you want to pivot and argue he should not have been in the ring anyway.

Thats fine with me, it just proves my point that much more.

I think a reading comprehension class would be beneficial to you. That is not what i said what so ever. I stated that IF Sting had the preexisting condition as you claim that a pre-employment medical examination would have picked it up. And he would have never been allowed to enter the ring. You should really quit trying to twist things around in order to make them say what you want.

I think anger management classes might be beneficial to you.

There is nothing here I needed to twist:

1) Rollins did not botch a move and injure Sting
2) I never said you personally claimed he did
3) you DID quote my post and instantly pivot to wellness policies, pre employment exams & CM Punk

I didn't even disagree with you on those things, they just didn't apply to what I posted.

There was nothing here even remotely worth getting upset over, much less start dropping insults so quickly.

(06-27-2016 06:34 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-27-2016 03:06 AM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  

(06-26-2016 10:21 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  In other words, I was correct that Rollins did not botch a move and injure Sting as was suggested earlier, so now you want to pivot and argue he should not have been in the ring anyway.

Thats fine with me, it just proves my point that much more.

I think a reading comprehension class would be beneficial to you. That is not what i said what so ever. I stated that IF Sting had the preexisting condition as you claim that a pre-employment medical examination would have picked it up. And he would have never been allowed to enter the ring. You should really quit trying to twist things around in order to make them say what you want.

I think anger management classes might be beneficial to you.

There is nothing here I needed to twist:

1) Rollins did not botch a move and injure Sting
2) I never said you personally claimed he did
3) you DID quote my post and instantly pivot to wellness policies, pre employment exams & CM Punk

I didn't even disagree with you on those things, they just didn't apply to what I posted.

There was nothing here even remotely worth getting upset over, much less start dropping insults so quickly.

That's race car guys calling card.

Vince McMahon ruined everything. When the crowd is more entertaining than the performers then you have a big problem.