Embarrassing is the head coach still thinking Memphis can be an at large team.

http://www.fox13memphis.com/sports/pastn...m/75228915

(02-12-2016 01:05 PM)salukiblue Wrote:  Embarrassing is the head coach still thinking Memphis can be an at large team.

http://www.fox13memphis.com/sports/pastn...m/75228915

There's a fine line between being the king of optimism and being flat out crazy.

is he trying to hypnotize folks into believing him. there are only two posters that I know that will and they have been named in this thread.

No more pixie dust!

no kidding. We need some peyton dust.

(02-12-2016 12:29 PM)tiger2000 Wrote:  

(02-12-2016 12:25 PM)salukiblue Wrote:  

(02-12-2016 12:14 PM)MemphisCanes Wrote:  

(02-12-2016 10:50 AM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  Are you guys really that desperate to find something to ***** about. That was put in there by the SID office as a tongue and cheek stat. Anyone who took it serious is a complete moron.

Holy moly, he said "tongue and cheek".

Is it time to unleash the "escape goat?"

For all intensive purposes, whether or not it was tongue and cheek is a mute point. Most readers would just take it for granite.

Irregardless, I think we should just nip it in the butt and except it as a joke.

But then I could care less.

(02-12-2016 02:20 PM)3rdgenerationtiger Wrote:  

(02-12-2016 12:29 PM)tiger2000 Wrote:  

(02-12-2016 12:25 PM)salukiblue Wrote:  

(02-12-2016 12:14 PM)MemphisCanes Wrote:  

(02-12-2016 10:50 AM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  Are you guys really that desperate to find something to ***** about. That was put in there by the SID office as a tongue and cheek stat. Anyone who took it serious is a complete moron.

Holy moly, he said "tongue and cheek".

Is it time to unleash the "escape goat?"

For all intensive purposes, whether or not it was tongue and cheek is a mute point. Most readers would just take it for granite.

Irregardless, I think we should just nip it in the butt and except it as a joke.

But then I could care less.

Bravo.

(02-12-2016 02:20 PM)3rdgenerationtiger Wrote:  

(02-12-2016 12:29 PM)tiger2000 Wrote:  

(02-12-2016 12:25 PM)salukiblue Wrote:  

(02-12-2016 12:14 PM)MemphisCanes Wrote:  

(02-12-2016 10:50 AM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  Are you guys really that desperate to find something to ***** about. That was put in there by the SID office as a tongue and cheek stat. Anyone who took it serious is a complete moron.

Holy moly, he said "tongue and cheek".

Is it time to unleash the "escape goat?"

For all intensive purposes, whether or not it was tongue and cheek is a mute point. Most readers would just take it for granite.

Irregardless, I think we should just nip it in the butt and except it as a joke.

But then I could care less.

I've noticed it's a re-occurring problem with some.

(02-12-2016 02:29 PM)salukiblue Wrote:  

(02-12-2016 02:20 PM)3rdgenerationtiger Wrote:  

(02-12-2016 12:29 PM)tiger2000 Wrote:  

(02-12-2016 12:25 PM)salukiblue Wrote:  

(02-12-2016 12:14 PM)MemphisCanes Wrote:  Holy moly, he said "tongue and cheek".

Is it time to unleash the "escape goat?"

For all intensive purposes, whether or not it was tongue and cheek is a mute point. Most readers would just take it for granite.

Irregardless, I think we should just nip it in the butt and except it as a joke.

But then I could care less.

Bravo.

Almost got all my pet peeves in that one. Good job, but it lacks one thing to be at the top of the heap: The ever-present "there/their/they're" trifecta.

When I started reading, I wanted to punch my monitor. Then I realized what he was doing and had to LOL.

(02-12-2016 11:08 PM)former guest Wrote:  

(02-12-2016 02:29 PM)salukiblue Wrote:  

(02-12-2016 02:20 PM)3rdgenerationtiger Wrote:  

(02-12-2016 12:29 PM)tiger2000 Wrote:  

(02-12-2016 12:25 PM)salukiblue Wrote:  Is it time to unleash the "escape goat?"

For all intensive purposes, whether or not it was tongue and cheek is a mute point. Most readers would just take it for granite.

Irregardless, I think we should just nip it in the butt and except it as a joke.

But then I could care less.

Bravo.

Good job, but it lacks one thing to be at the top of the heap: The ever-present "there/their/they're" trifecta.

Your absolutely write.

A sense of humor like that makes it easier when we loose.

I think they did that on purpose ... like a little "easter egg".

(02-13-2016 11:31 AM)80sTiger Wrote:  I think they did that on purpose ... like a little "easter egg".

Really, there is no deep seeded meaning. I just wrote it for general principals.

(02-12-2016 10:50 AM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  Are you guys really that desperate to find something to ***** about. That was put in there by the SID office as a tongue and cheek stat. Anyone who took it serious is a complete moron.

They know.

Cannot put them back in the barn.