(07-22-2015 01:19 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(07-21-2015 01:43 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  Rice will have 2 chances this season against Texas on Sept 12 and Baylor on Sept 26, 2015. Kudos to the schedulers of those two games.

Greenspan?

Either him or Chris Del Conte (now TCU's AD--talk about the golden touch!)

If it was Greenspan, then that would be by far his greatest achievement when he was AD at Rice.

Glad we have Dr, Joe Karlgaard now. We needed him years ago.

(07-21-2015 10:06 AM)BeliefBlazer Wrote:  .361 for UAB. Yack. We've got a better record than that against current members of the Belt and the AAC.

We were around .500 until Watson burned the place down on his way out. Follow him with Cubby Bryant's drinkin' buddy and the 'stache, and this is what you get.

We finally start inching toward respectability and whammo, kill football.

Bastards.

Looks like, based on that, the Herd has played more games than anyone else in CUSA. Substantially more in many cases.

(07-26-2015 01:33 PM)MUther Wrote:  Looks like, based on that, the Herd has played more games than anyone else in CUSA. Substantially more in many cases.

UAB was not listed by the OP.

No, that would be USM that has played the most CUSA games.

UAB is a current CUSA member.

You guys should check out this site, a little more graphical than cfbdatawarehouse

http://www.winsipedia.com/

I predict UAB will go undefeated the next two seasons, but it won't help our winning %. You do the math.

(07-26-2015 04:00 PM)banker Wrote:  No, that would be USM that has played the most CUSA games.

I said most games. Most games. Like since starting football. It makes sense since we've been around longer that than other schools in CUSA

(07-21-2015 11:13 AM)inutech Wrote:  

(07-21-2015 09:50 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(07-21-2015 09:41 AM)T_Won1 Wrote:  

(07-21-2015 09:26 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(07-21-2015 08:50 AM)inutech Wrote:  We're tied with Marshall and Rice.

http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/act...tions=none

Interesting that Rice and LaTech are tied in total points, also.

Even more interesting is that we usually blow each other out. It's never really a close game.

2002: 37-20, Rice
2003: 49-14, Rice
2004: 51-14, Tech
2012: 56-37, Tech
2013: 52-14, Rice
2014: 76-31, Tech

2004 was a 62 point swing from the 2003 game.
2013 was a 57 point swing from the 2012 game.
2014 was a 83 point swing from the 2013 game.

Tiebreaker 10-30-15

Yep. Then we'll break the tie with Marshall on 12-05-15.

In Ruston.

You guys left out the other two meetings between us:
2001: 41-38 Tech (OT)
1965: 14-0 Rice

So- the ONLY game in the entire series that was decided by less than a 2TD margin was actually two blowouts in one:
2001 1h: 31-3 Tech
2001 2h: 35-7 Rice

(07-20-2015 10:35 PM)banker Wrote:  Well, you have 63 games against WKU, which I believe is the most played series in the new conference alignment of CUSA. Next closest is probably USM and La Tech.

I knew that their was at least one thing that I really loved about old Raggedy Red Thank you, Western!

(07-26-2015 08:44 PM)ECBrad Wrote:  You guys should check out this site, a little more graphical than cfbdatawarehouse

http://www.winsipedia.com/

Checked it out using MT vs Alabama. Says the series stands at 0-1, it's actually 0-2, Raiders played them in 2002 (39-34 loss) and 2005 (26-7 loss).

(07-30-2015 05:03 AM)SpaceRaider Wrote:  

(07-26-2015 08:44 PM)ECBrad Wrote:  You guys should check out this site, a little more graphical than cfbdatawarehouse

http://www.winsipedia.com/

Checked it out using MT vs Alabama. Says the series stands at 0-1, it's actually 0-2, Raiders played them in 2002 (39-34 loss) and 2005 (26-7 loss).

He said it was more graphical. He didn't say it was accurate.