Quote:Who says he went to the police? Just as likely a parent or jealous friend did.
The article. But yes, most likely it was his mom who went with him to go after bragging to friends.
Quote:She's like 47, he's 15, it's creepy and illegal.
Illegal? Yes. I have no argument it should be a violation. But in an analogy: 10 yard penalty, 15 yard penalty and loss of down, ejected from the game, or banned from the sport? That's the argument, IMO. I would argue highly against the latter.
Creepy? Yes. But unless he's Really Really scrawny for his age (which I doubt; she was an NFL Cheerleader), he, not she, would be in the physical domination/superior realm -- which shouldn't be ignored in cases like this. If he was 16 in the state of MI, that's the age of consent, and wouldn't be illegal but would be sensitive to coersion (but look at her: that'd be a stretch to claim for a hormone-driven male teen). At 15 you can be convicted of murder. 16 is the age of consent in many states including MI.
Creepy if he was 18? Yep. Still would have that "creepy" label, in real life. Funny how a great in-shape but older guy in a porn movie banging a barely-18 gal, although it may not be one's cup of tea, is still in the mainstream boat and not hissed at. A 15 year old guy on a high school football team -- who would be more physically dominating -- the barely-18 gal or the 15 year old guy? Would that be creepy? No.
IMO, it'd be a 15 yard penalty. She wasn't a teacher having authoritative control, and she wasn't a woman with physical control (unlike when you reverse the genders 99.99% of the time). And she's Hot. Come on. I would have paid money (so to speak) at 15 for that. Just saying. Not healthy or good for her as an adult to carry that out and you have to draw the line somewhere (18) -- but just saying it's Not nor should be treated as in the same boat as if having administrative/authoritative control and/or physical control over a Male who's not a child, but is under-age about sex. She's a MILF. Just sayin'.