Ohio and Toledo have announced updates to their '15-'16 men's bbball non conference schedule this week, if you have info for other teams, feel free to share below.

Ohio-
Home (3)- #136 FGCU, #234 UC Riverside, #290 Marshall
Neutral (3)- #46 Tulsa, +2 TBD (Paradise Jam)
Away (1)- #121 St. Bonaventure

Ohio has 7 of 13 possible OOC games scheduled and hopes to get to 11/13 with 1 more H/H series starting on the road and 3 more home games, probably buyouts, for a total of 6 Home, 3 Neutral and 2 Away. Ohio only played 11/13 last year as well.


Toledo-
Home (5)- #129 Cleveland State, #155 Oakland, #265 N kentucky, #340 NC A&T, #343 Bethune-Cookman
Neutral (3)- +3 TBD (Great Alaska Shootout)
Away (3)- #123 Loyola Chicago, #205 Detroit, #291 Youngstown St

Toledo has 11 of 13 possible OOC games scheduled and hope to schedule 2 more. Coach K was quoted as saying he prefers a H/H or even a 2/1 with the right team but is having a hard time finding teams willing to travel to Toledo. Half of the Horizon League is scheduled to play Toledo.

Unable to get to the NCAAs through the MAC, we will be simul-members of the Horizon league giving us the opportunity to disappoint Rocket fans in two different league championships.

It was reported last night that UB might be playing at Duke next season.

Half of the MAC teams are in one of those exempt tourneys:

http://www.bloggingthebracket.com/2013/1...events-MTE

Miami is hosting a mini-tournament from 11/20 through 11/22, featuring us, Northeastern, Lipscomb, and Florida Atlantic. We're paying for it with a buy game at Xavier.

Toledo should be down but so is the schedule so they could have a decent record come MAC play.

(05-26-2015 01:40 PM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  Toledo should be down but so is the schedule so they could have a decent record come MAC play.

Well we could have inflated it by playing four NAIA teams like EMU did last year. LOL

(05-26-2015 03:07 PM)utpotts Wrote:  

(05-26-2015 01:40 PM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  Toledo should be down but so is the schedule so they could have a decent record come MAC play.

Well we could have inflated it by playing four NAIA teams like EMU did last year. LOL

Five, if you count Toledo's game in Ypsilanti.

(05-26-2015 11:03 PM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote:  

(05-26-2015 03:07 PM)utpotts Wrote:  

(05-26-2015 01:40 PM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  Toledo should be down but so is the schedule so they could have a decent record come MAC play.

Well we could have inflated it by playing four NAIA teams like EMU did last year. LOL

Five, if you count Toledo's game in Ypsilanti.

If I recall correctly Toledo lost that game in Ypsi as they did the previous year. I guess by your comment that Toledo was the fifth NAIA team for EMU?

(05-27-2015 04:25 AM)emu79 Wrote:  

(05-26-2015 11:03 PM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote:  

(05-26-2015 03:07 PM)utpotts Wrote:  

(05-26-2015 01:40 PM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  Toledo should be down but so is the schedule so they could have a decent record come MAC play.

Well we could have inflated it by playing four NAIA teams like EMU did last year. LOL

Five, if you count Toledo's game in Ypsilanti.

If I recall correctly Toledo lost that game in Ypsi as they did the previous year. I guess by your comment that Toledo was the fifth NAIA team for EMU?

Exactly. The result looked like what one would expect EMU to do to an NAIA team.

(05-27-2015 11:56 AM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote:  

(05-27-2015 04:25 AM)emu79 Wrote:  

(05-26-2015 11:03 PM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote:  

(05-26-2015 03:07 PM)utpotts Wrote:  

(05-26-2015 01:40 PM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  Toledo should be down but so is the schedule so they could have a decent record come MAC play.

Well we could have inflated it by playing four NAIA teams like EMU did last year. LOL

Five, if you count Toledo's game in Ypsilanti.

If I recall correctly Toledo lost that game in Ypsi as they did the previous year. I guess by your comment that Toledo was the fifth NAIA team for EMU?

Exactly. The result looked like what one would expect EMU to do to an NAIA team.

Well in that case they've played 6 NAIA teams.

(05-27-2015 01:58 PM)NIU007 Wrote:  

(05-27-2015 11:56 AM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote:  

(05-27-2015 04:25 AM)emu79 Wrote:  

(05-26-2015 11:03 PM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote:  

(05-26-2015 03:07 PM)utpotts Wrote:  Well we could have inflated it by playing four NAIA teams like EMU did last year. LOL

Five, if you count Toledo's game in Ypsilanti.

If I recall correctly Toledo lost that game in Ypsi as they did the previous year. I guess by your comment that Toledo was the fifth NAIA team for EMU?

Exactly. The result looked like what one would expect EMU to do to an NAIA team.

Well in that case they've played 6 NAIA teams.

Toledo and EMU have a 'deal': The visiting team plays like a NAIA team.

The last four games (over the last two years) have been blowouts with the home team winning big each time.

(05-27-2015 02:12 PM)emu steve Wrote:  

(05-27-2015 01:58 PM)NIU007 Wrote:  

(05-27-2015 11:56 AM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote:  

(05-27-2015 04:25 AM)emu79 Wrote:  

(05-26-2015 11:03 PM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote:  Five, if you count Toledo's game in Ypsilanti.

If I recall correctly Toledo lost that game in Ypsi as they did the previous year. I guess by your comment that Toledo was the fifth NAIA team for EMU?

Exactly. The result looked like what one would expect EMU to do to an NAIA team.

Well in that case they've played 6 NAIA teams.

Toledo and EMU have a 'deal': The visiting team plays like a NAIA team.

The last four games (over the last two years) have been blowouts with the home team winning big each time.

I noticed that. Makes little sense. Never saw a team so blase' as UT at EMU this year.