The unofficial online home for fans of the Western Michigan University Broncos. Part of Collegiate Sports Nation (CSN).

#105 Tulsa

#104 Troy

(05-14-2015 09:03 AM)toddjnsn Wrote:  

Quote:Or maybe they forgot EMU is D1. No way they rate higher than Syracuse, Purdue, Colorado. Or should they?

Yes, maybe they know something we don't know. Maybe this is the year of the Emoos! (... making sounds of a dying animal ...)

That they get to four wins?

#103 USF

Quote:That they get to four wins?

Yeah -- who knows, right? 4 wins to them is cause for celebration in the streets of Emoo. It's like getting 11 wins for any other team. :)

#102 Oregon State

They must have forgotten about EMU. And I don't see CMU being that bad either.

(05-18-2015 10:16 AM)NIU007 Wrote:  They must have forgotten about EMU. And I don't see CMU being that bad either.

This.

CMU will fall, but I doubt they'll be down there with the annual bottom-feeders. There's no way EMU is higher than 110. And we're up to 102 now? They showed nothing last year to show that there would be significant improvement.

(05-18-2015 10:19 AM)ColinApocalypse Wrote:  

(05-18-2015 10:16 AM)NIU007 Wrote:  They must have forgotten about EMU. And I don't see CMU being that bad either.

This.

CMU will fall, but I doubt they'll be down there with the annual bottom-feeders. There's no way EMU is higher than 110. And we're up to 102 now? They showed nothing last year to show that there would be significant improvement.

Might have been an error, and they meant to put EMU there instead of CMU.

(05-18-2015 10:33 AM)NIU007 Wrote:  

(05-18-2015 10:19 AM)ColinApocalypse Wrote:  

(05-18-2015 10:16 AM)NIU007 Wrote:  They must have forgotten about EMU. And I don't see CMU being that bad either.

This.

CMU will fall, but I doubt they'll be down there with the annual bottom-feeders. There's no way EMU is higher than 110. And we're up to 102 now? They showed nothing last year to show that there would be significant improvement.

Might have been an error, and they meant to put EMU there instead of CMU.

It's completely possible. People confuse the 3 Michigan MAC schools all the time.

Someone tell them! This is getting awkward.

I think EMU will be better than CMU this year.

I'll take that bet.

(05-18-2015 10:35 AM)ColinApocalypse Wrote:  

(05-18-2015 10:33 AM)NIU007 Wrote:  

(05-18-2015 10:19 AM)ColinApocalypse Wrote:  

(05-18-2015 10:16 AM)NIU007 Wrote:  They must have forgotten about EMU. And I don't see CMU being that bad either.

This.

CMU will fall, but I doubt they'll be down there with the annual bottom-feeders. There's no way EMU is higher than 110. And we're up to 102 now? They showed nothing last year to show that there would be significant improvement.

Might have been an error, and they meant to put EMU there instead of CMU.

It's completely possible. People confuse the 3 Michigan MAC schools all the time.

True, but the ranking came with a whole write up on CMU so I doubt it.

(05-18-2015 02:35 PM)Stampede your face!! Wrote:  I think EMU will be better than CMU this year.

That's like saying Napoleon Dynamite will be cooler than Louis Skulnick.

Quote:I think EMU will be better than CMU this year.

I give it a 33% chance. Not a bad chance. If EMU was demonstrating that they're on their way up and CMU being in the position they're in now, then I would be more comfortable in saying that.

#101 EMU

Thar she blows

(05-18-2015 10:55 PM)toddjnsn Wrote:  

Quote:I think EMU will be better than CMU this year.

I give it a 33% chance. Not a bad chance. If EMU was demonstrating that they're on their way up and CMU being in the position they're in now, then I would be more comfortable in saying that.

Not many people gave us a chance of being better than Central after Fleck's first year either.

Quote:Not many people gave us a chance of being better than Central after Fleck's first year either.

Yeah, but it's EMU. Jesus himself would be walking on water all day pondering how in the hell to get EMU to 6 wins, to no avail. :)