http://bleacherreport.com/articles/24167...-look-like

I think someone posted something similar at the end of football season. Although realistically, that is waaay too many teams, but let's face it, it was made for fun.

Southern and ULL both making an appearance here.

I would totally take a 9 seed, but wouldn't want to have to face Bama in the 2nd round.

(04-02-2015 02:32 PM)NCeagle Wrote:  http://bleacherreport.com/articles/24167...-look-like

I think someone posted something similar at the end of football season. Although realistically, that is waaay too many teams, but let's face it, it was made for fun.

Southern and ULL both making an appearance here.

I would totally take a 9 seed, but wouldn't want to have to face Bama in the 2nd round.

Bad enough we're passed over for bowls two years running . . . . Now we can't even make the field of 64 in a made up tournament . . . .

(04-02-2015 02:32 PM)NCeagle Wrote:  http://bleacherreport.com/articles/24167...-look-like

I think someone posted something similar at the end of football season. Although realistically, that is waaay too many teams, but let's face it, it was made for fun.

Southern and ULL both making an appearance here.

I would totally take a 9 seed, but wouldn't want to have to face Bama in the 2nd round.

Would FBS have allowed an FCS upstart to participate in the playoffs their first season in FBS?

(04-02-2015 02:44 PM)APPrising Wrote:  

(04-02-2015 02:32 PM)NCeagle Wrote:  http://bleacherreport.com/articles/24167...-look-like

I think someone posted something similar at the end of football season. Although realistically, that is waaay too many teams, but let's face it, it was made for fun.

Southern and ULL both making an appearance here.

I would totally take a 9 seed, but wouldn't want to have to face Bama in the 2nd round.

Would FBS have allowed an FCS upstart to participate in the playoffs their first season in FBS?

Of course not. That would be absolute nonsense.